Genetic attributions: Sign of intolerance or acceptance?

Stephen P. Schneider, Kevin B. Smith, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many scholars argue that people who attribute human characteristics to genetic causes also tend to hold politically and socially problematic attitudes. More specifically, public acceptance of genetic influences is believed to be associated with intolerance, prejudice, and the legitimation of social inequities and laissez-faire policies. We test these expectations with original data from two nationally representative samples that allow us to identify the American public’s attributional patterns across 18 diverse traits. Key findings are (1) genetic attributions are actually more likely to be made by liberals, not conservatives; (2) genetic attributions are associated with higher, not lower, levels of tolerance of vulnerable individuals; and (3) genetic attributions do not correlate with unseemly racial attitudes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1023-1027
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

attribution
tolerance
acceptance
legitimation
prejudice
cause

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Genetic attributions : Sign of intolerance or acceptance? / Schneider, Stephen P.; Smith, Kevin B.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 80, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 1023-1027.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schneider, Stephen P. ; Smith, Kevin B. ; Hibbing, John R. / Genetic attributions : Sign of intolerance or acceptance?. In: Journal of Politics. 2018 ; Vol. 80, No. 3. pp. 1023-1027.
@article{c8518df2b3c54fc3bea4c95354655965,
title = "Genetic attributions: Sign of intolerance or acceptance?",
abstract = "Many scholars argue that people who attribute human characteristics to genetic causes also tend to hold politically and socially problematic attitudes. More specifically, public acceptance of genetic influences is believed to be associated with intolerance, prejudice, and the legitimation of social inequities and laissez-faire policies. We test these expectations with original data from two nationally representative samples that allow us to identify the American public’s attributional patterns across 18 diverse traits. Key findings are (1) genetic attributions are actually more likely to be made by liberals, not conservatives; (2) genetic attributions are associated with higher, not lower, levels of tolerance of vulnerable individuals; and (3) genetic attributions do not correlate with unseemly racial attitudes.",
author = "Schneider, {Stephen P.} and Smith, {Kevin B.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/696860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "1023--1027",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic attributions

T2 - Sign of intolerance or acceptance?

AU - Schneider, Stephen P.

AU - Smith, Kevin B.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Many scholars argue that people who attribute human characteristics to genetic causes also tend to hold politically and socially problematic attitudes. More specifically, public acceptance of genetic influences is believed to be associated with intolerance, prejudice, and the legitimation of social inequities and laissez-faire policies. We test these expectations with original data from two nationally representative samples that allow us to identify the American public’s attributional patterns across 18 diverse traits. Key findings are (1) genetic attributions are actually more likely to be made by liberals, not conservatives; (2) genetic attributions are associated with higher, not lower, levels of tolerance of vulnerable individuals; and (3) genetic attributions do not correlate with unseemly racial attitudes.

AB - Many scholars argue that people who attribute human characteristics to genetic causes also tend to hold politically and socially problematic attitudes. More specifically, public acceptance of genetic influences is believed to be associated with intolerance, prejudice, and the legitimation of social inequities and laissez-faire policies. We test these expectations with original data from two nationally representative samples that allow us to identify the American public’s attributional patterns across 18 diverse traits. Key findings are (1) genetic attributions are actually more likely to be made by liberals, not conservatives; (2) genetic attributions are associated with higher, not lower, levels of tolerance of vulnerable individuals; and (3) genetic attributions do not correlate with unseemly racial attitudes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046800363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046800363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/696860

DO - 10.1086/696860

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046800363

VL - 80

SP - 1023

EP - 1027

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 3

ER -