Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection

K. M. Rolfe, W. M. Snelling, M. K. Nielsen, H. C. Freetly, C. L. Ferrell, T. G. Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Growth, feed intake, and temperament indicator data, collected over 5 yr on a total of 1,141 to 1,183 mixed-breed steers, were used to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters. All steers had a portion of Hereford, Angus, or both as well as varying percentages of Simmental, Charolais, Limousin, Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and MARC III composite. Because the steers were slaughtered on various dates each year and the animals thus varied in days on feed, BW and feed data were adjusted to a 140-d feeding period basis. Adjustment of measures of feed efficiency [G:F or residual feed intake (RFI), intake adjusted for metabolic body size, and BW gain] for body fatness recorded at slaughter had little effect on the results of analyses. Average daily gain was less heritable (0.26) than was midtest BW (MBW; 0.35). Measures of feed intake had greater estimates of heritability, with 140-d DMI at 0.40 and RFI at 0.52; the heritability estimate for G:F was 0.27. Flight speed (FS), as an indicator of temperament, had an estimated heritability of 0.34 and a repeatability of 0.63. As expected, a strong genetic (0.86) correlation was estimated between ADG and MBW; genetic correlations were less strong between DMI and ADG or MBW (0.56 and 0.71). Residual feed intake and DMI had a genetic correlation of 0.66. Indexes for phenotypic RFI and genotypically restricted RFI (no correlation with BW gain) were compared with simple economic indexes incorporating feed intake and growth to elucidate expected selection responses under different criteria. In general, few breed differences were detected across the various measurements. Heterosis contributed to greater DMI, RFI, and MBW, but it did not significantly affect ADG, G:F, or FS. Balancing output (growth) with input costs (feed) is needed in practicing selection, and FS would not be recommended as an indicator trait for selection to change feed efficiency. An index including BW gain and RFI produced the best economic outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3452-3459
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of animal science
Volume89
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

Fingerprint

beef cattle
Temperament
feed intake
Growth
Economics
Hybrid Vigor
Social Adjustment
Body Size
genetic correlation
temperament
heritability
flight
Costs and Cost Analysis
feed conversion
Red Angus
Gelbvieh
Limousin (cattle breed)
input costs
economics
selection response

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Feed intake
  • Flight speed
  • Genetic variation
  • Growth
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection. / Rolfe, K. M.; Snelling, W. M.; Nielsen, M. K.; Freetly, H. C.; Ferrell, C. L.; Jenkins, T. G.

In: Journal of animal science, Vol. 89, No. 11, 01.11.2011, p. 3452-3459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rolfe, K. M. ; Snelling, W. M. ; Nielsen, M. K. ; Freetly, H. C. ; Ferrell, C. L. ; Jenkins, T. G. / Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection. In: Journal of animal science. 2011 ; Vol. 89, No. 11. pp. 3452-3459.
@article{15dcdd90a69e4c3b9284d21878e52632,
title = "Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection",
abstract = "Growth, feed intake, and temperament indicator data, collected over 5 yr on a total of 1,141 to 1,183 mixed-breed steers, were used to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters. All steers had a portion of Hereford, Angus, or both as well as varying percentages of Simmental, Charolais, Limousin, Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and MARC III composite. Because the steers were slaughtered on various dates each year and the animals thus varied in days on feed, BW and feed data were adjusted to a 140-d feeding period basis. Adjustment of measures of feed efficiency [G:F or residual feed intake (RFI), intake adjusted for metabolic body size, and BW gain] for body fatness recorded at slaughter had little effect on the results of analyses. Average daily gain was less heritable (0.26) than was midtest BW (MBW; 0.35). Measures of feed intake had greater estimates of heritability, with 140-d DMI at 0.40 and RFI at 0.52; the heritability estimate for G:F was 0.27. Flight speed (FS), as an indicator of temperament, had an estimated heritability of 0.34 and a repeatability of 0.63. As expected, a strong genetic (0.86) correlation was estimated between ADG and MBW; genetic correlations were less strong between DMI and ADG or MBW (0.56 and 0.71). Residual feed intake and DMI had a genetic correlation of 0.66. Indexes for phenotypic RFI and genotypically restricted RFI (no correlation with BW gain) were compared with simple economic indexes incorporating feed intake and growth to elucidate expected selection responses under different criteria. In general, few breed differences were detected across the various measurements. Heterosis contributed to greater DMI, RFI, and MBW, but it did not significantly affect ADG, G:F, or FS. Balancing output (growth) with input costs (feed) is needed in practicing selection, and FS would not be recommended as an indicator trait for selection to change feed efficiency. An index including BW gain and RFI produced the best economic outcome.",
keywords = "Cattle, Feed intake, Flight speed, Genetic variation, Growth, Selection",
author = "Rolfe, {K. M.} and Snelling, {W. M.} and Nielsen, {M. K.} and Freetly, {H. C.} and Ferrell, {C. L.} and Jenkins, {T. G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2527/jas.2011-3961",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "3452--3459",
journal = "Journal of Animal Science",
issn = "0021-8812",
publisher = "American Society of Animal Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection

AU - Rolfe, K. M.

AU - Snelling, W. M.

AU - Nielsen, M. K.

AU - Freetly, H. C.

AU - Ferrell, C. L.

AU - Jenkins, T. G.

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Growth, feed intake, and temperament indicator data, collected over 5 yr on a total of 1,141 to 1,183 mixed-breed steers, were used to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters. All steers had a portion of Hereford, Angus, or both as well as varying percentages of Simmental, Charolais, Limousin, Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and MARC III composite. Because the steers were slaughtered on various dates each year and the animals thus varied in days on feed, BW and feed data were adjusted to a 140-d feeding period basis. Adjustment of measures of feed efficiency [G:F or residual feed intake (RFI), intake adjusted for metabolic body size, and BW gain] for body fatness recorded at slaughter had little effect on the results of analyses. Average daily gain was less heritable (0.26) than was midtest BW (MBW; 0.35). Measures of feed intake had greater estimates of heritability, with 140-d DMI at 0.40 and RFI at 0.52; the heritability estimate for G:F was 0.27. Flight speed (FS), as an indicator of temperament, had an estimated heritability of 0.34 and a repeatability of 0.63. As expected, a strong genetic (0.86) correlation was estimated between ADG and MBW; genetic correlations were less strong between DMI and ADG or MBW (0.56 and 0.71). Residual feed intake and DMI had a genetic correlation of 0.66. Indexes for phenotypic RFI and genotypically restricted RFI (no correlation with BW gain) were compared with simple economic indexes incorporating feed intake and growth to elucidate expected selection responses under different criteria. In general, few breed differences were detected across the various measurements. Heterosis contributed to greater DMI, RFI, and MBW, but it did not significantly affect ADG, G:F, or FS. Balancing output (growth) with input costs (feed) is needed in practicing selection, and FS would not be recommended as an indicator trait for selection to change feed efficiency. An index including BW gain and RFI produced the best economic outcome.

AB - Growth, feed intake, and temperament indicator data, collected over 5 yr on a total of 1,141 to 1,183 mixed-breed steers, were used to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters. All steers had a portion of Hereford, Angus, or both as well as varying percentages of Simmental, Charolais, Limousin, Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and MARC III composite. Because the steers were slaughtered on various dates each year and the animals thus varied in days on feed, BW and feed data were adjusted to a 140-d feeding period basis. Adjustment of measures of feed efficiency [G:F or residual feed intake (RFI), intake adjusted for metabolic body size, and BW gain] for body fatness recorded at slaughter had little effect on the results of analyses. Average daily gain was less heritable (0.26) than was midtest BW (MBW; 0.35). Measures of feed intake had greater estimates of heritability, with 140-d DMI at 0.40 and RFI at 0.52; the heritability estimate for G:F was 0.27. Flight speed (FS), as an indicator of temperament, had an estimated heritability of 0.34 and a repeatability of 0.63. As expected, a strong genetic (0.86) correlation was estimated between ADG and MBW; genetic correlations were less strong between DMI and ADG or MBW (0.56 and 0.71). Residual feed intake and DMI had a genetic correlation of 0.66. Indexes for phenotypic RFI and genotypically restricted RFI (no correlation with BW gain) were compared with simple economic indexes incorporating feed intake and growth to elucidate expected selection responses under different criteria. In general, few breed differences were detected across the various measurements. Heterosis contributed to greater DMI, RFI, and MBW, but it did not significantly affect ADG, G:F, or FS. Balancing output (growth) with input costs (feed) is needed in practicing selection, and FS would not be recommended as an indicator trait for selection to change feed efficiency. An index including BW gain and RFI produced the best economic outcome.

KW - Cattle

KW - Feed intake

KW - Flight speed

KW - Genetic variation

KW - Growth

KW - Selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054758785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054758785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2527/jas.2011-3961

DO - 10.2527/jas.2011-3961

M3 - Article

C2 - 21622877

AN - SCOPUS:80054758785

VL - 89

SP - 3452

EP - 3459

JO - Journal of Animal Science

JF - Journal of Animal Science

SN - 0021-8812

IS - 11

ER -