General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match

Kimberly D Schenarts, Donald M. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To identify expectations of general surgery program directors (PDs) for recruitment behavior, and to document the experiences, perceptions, and ethical dilemmas they experienced with the 1998 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Methods Two hundred sixty-five general surgery PDs were asked to complete a 30-item written questionnaire. Questions inquired about PD perceptions of students' interviewing practices, how communication with applicants is conducted and interpreted, and overall perceptions of the match. Results A total of 77.7% of PDs responded. A total of 44% of PDs found nothing wrong with students interviewing in multiple specialties and conceded legitimate reasons for doing so; yet, 75% of PDs felt this practice negatively affected students' rank order. A total of 46.6% of programs told students to keep in touch to be ranked; only 8.7% of PDs believed students' stated interest, and 76.6% of PDs said these affirmations had no effect on students' rank. A total of 36.5% of PDs felt students made informal commitments to them, and 90.4% felt students at least sometimes lied to them. A total of 51.7% of PDs felt the match was a reasonable process that needed no changes. Conclusions As long as the stakes are high and there are no repercussions for unethical behaviors and practices during residency recruitment, gamesmanship will continue to be the accepted culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)460-465
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent surgery
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

surgery
director
Students
student
Internship and Residency
Communication
applicant
commitment
resident
questionnaire
communication

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Graduate education
  • Match
  • Recruitment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match. / Schenarts, Kimberly D; Jacobs, Donald M.

In: Current surgery, Vol. 57, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 460-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schenarts, Kimberly D ; Jacobs, Donald M. / General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match. In: Current surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 460-465.
@article{94e6aecaefbe46979fbe8d69dc7ebfdc,
title = "General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match",
abstract = "Purpose To identify expectations of general surgery program directors (PDs) for recruitment behavior, and to document the experiences, perceptions, and ethical dilemmas they experienced with the 1998 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Methods Two hundred sixty-five general surgery PDs were asked to complete a 30-item written questionnaire. Questions inquired about PD perceptions of students' interviewing practices, how communication with applicants is conducted and interpreted, and overall perceptions of the match. Results A total of 77.7{\%} of PDs responded. A total of 44{\%} of PDs found nothing wrong with students interviewing in multiple specialties and conceded legitimate reasons for doing so; yet, 75{\%} of PDs felt this practice negatively affected students' rank order. A total of 46.6{\%} of programs told students to keep in touch to be ranked; only 8.7{\%} of PDs believed students' stated interest, and 76.6{\%} of PDs said these affirmations had no effect on students' rank. A total of 36.5{\%} of PDs felt students made informal commitments to them, and 90.4{\%} felt students at least sometimes lied to them. A total of 51.7{\%} of PDs felt the match was a reasonable process that needed no changes. Conclusions As long as the stakes are high and there are no repercussions for unethical behaviors and practices during residency recruitment, gamesmanship will continue to be the accepted culture.",
keywords = "Ethics, Graduate education, Match, Recruitment",
author = "Schenarts, {Kimberly D} and Jacobs, {Donald M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00309-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "460--465",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match

AU - Schenarts, Kimberly D

AU - Jacobs, Donald M.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Purpose To identify expectations of general surgery program directors (PDs) for recruitment behavior, and to document the experiences, perceptions, and ethical dilemmas they experienced with the 1998 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Methods Two hundred sixty-five general surgery PDs were asked to complete a 30-item written questionnaire. Questions inquired about PD perceptions of students' interviewing practices, how communication with applicants is conducted and interpreted, and overall perceptions of the match. Results A total of 77.7% of PDs responded. A total of 44% of PDs found nothing wrong with students interviewing in multiple specialties and conceded legitimate reasons for doing so; yet, 75% of PDs felt this practice negatively affected students' rank order. A total of 46.6% of programs told students to keep in touch to be ranked; only 8.7% of PDs believed students' stated interest, and 76.6% of PDs said these affirmations had no effect on students' rank. A total of 36.5% of PDs felt students made informal commitments to them, and 90.4% felt students at least sometimes lied to them. A total of 51.7% of PDs felt the match was a reasonable process that needed no changes. Conclusions As long as the stakes are high and there are no repercussions for unethical behaviors and practices during residency recruitment, gamesmanship will continue to be the accepted culture.

AB - Purpose To identify expectations of general surgery program directors (PDs) for recruitment behavior, and to document the experiences, perceptions, and ethical dilemmas they experienced with the 1998 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Methods Two hundred sixty-five general surgery PDs were asked to complete a 30-item written questionnaire. Questions inquired about PD perceptions of students' interviewing practices, how communication with applicants is conducted and interpreted, and overall perceptions of the match. Results A total of 77.7% of PDs responded. A total of 44% of PDs found nothing wrong with students interviewing in multiple specialties and conceded legitimate reasons for doing so; yet, 75% of PDs felt this practice negatively affected students' rank order. A total of 46.6% of programs told students to keep in touch to be ranked; only 8.7% of PDs believed students' stated interest, and 76.6% of PDs said these affirmations had no effect on students' rank. A total of 36.5% of PDs felt students made informal commitments to them, and 90.4% felt students at least sometimes lied to them. A total of 51.7% of PDs felt the match was a reasonable process that needed no changes. Conclusions As long as the stakes are high and there are no repercussions for unethical behaviors and practices during residency recruitment, gamesmanship will continue to be the accepted culture.

KW - Ethics

KW - Graduate education

KW - Match

KW - Recruitment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004939062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004939062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00309-3

DO - 10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00309-3

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 460

EP - 465

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 5

ER -