Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies

Myra Marx Ferree, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methodology is often a point of contention in gender-based salary studies. Although this debate seems at first to be merely about technical issues, it also has an important conceptual dimension. We argue that there are two competing implicit conceptions of discrimination, one institutional and the other individual, that underlie many such debates. We first contrast the preferred methodologies advanced by each side, the policy capturing approach and the flagging approach, and explore the theoretical meaning of their statistical models. We then describe a practical application of both methodological approaches in one specific salary inequity study. In conclusion, we reflect on the implications of such practical statistical choices, discuss how such models can be combined, and make suggestions for sociologists who act as statistical experts or work with them in gender-based salary inequity studies on their own campuses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-39
Number of pages33
JournalGender and Society
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

salary
gender
policy approach
methodology
sociologist
discrimination
expert
Salary
Policy Issues
Methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Gender-based pay gaps : Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies. / Ferree, Myra Marx; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Gender and Society, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 7-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f69e1883d6b40489b5bc8d96e6e60c5,
title = "Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies",
abstract = "Methodology is often a point of contention in gender-based salary studies. Although this debate seems at first to be merely about technical issues, it also has an important conceptual dimension. We argue that there are two competing implicit conceptions of discrimination, one institutional and the other individual, that underlie many such debates. We first contrast the preferred methodologies advanced by each side, the policy capturing approach and the flagging approach, and explore the theoretical meaning of their statistical models. We then describe a practical application of both methodological approaches in one specific salary inequity study. In conclusion, we reflect on the implications of such practical statistical choices, discuss how such models can be combined, and make suggestions for sociologists who act as statistical experts or work with them in gender-based salary inequity studies on their own campuses.",
author = "Ferree, {Myra Marx} and Julia McQuillan",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/089124398012001002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "7--39",
journal = "Gender and Society",
issn = "0891-2432",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender-based pay gaps

T2 - Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies

AU - Ferree, Myra Marx

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Methodology is often a point of contention in gender-based salary studies. Although this debate seems at first to be merely about technical issues, it also has an important conceptual dimension. We argue that there are two competing implicit conceptions of discrimination, one institutional and the other individual, that underlie many such debates. We first contrast the preferred methodologies advanced by each side, the policy capturing approach and the flagging approach, and explore the theoretical meaning of their statistical models. We then describe a practical application of both methodological approaches in one specific salary inequity study. In conclusion, we reflect on the implications of such practical statistical choices, discuss how such models can be combined, and make suggestions for sociologists who act as statistical experts or work with them in gender-based salary inequity studies on their own campuses.

AB - Methodology is often a point of contention in gender-based salary studies. Although this debate seems at first to be merely about technical issues, it also has an important conceptual dimension. We argue that there are two competing implicit conceptions of discrimination, one institutional and the other individual, that underlie many such debates. We first contrast the preferred methodologies advanced by each side, the policy capturing approach and the flagging approach, and explore the theoretical meaning of their statistical models. We then describe a practical application of both methodological approaches in one specific salary inequity study. In conclusion, we reflect on the implications of such practical statistical choices, discuss how such models can be combined, and make suggestions for sociologists who act as statistical experts or work with them in gender-based salary inequity studies on their own campuses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032219390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032219390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/089124398012001002

DO - 10.1177/089124398012001002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032219390

VL - 12

SP - 7

EP - 39

JO - Gender and Society

JF - Gender and Society

SN - 0891-2432

IS - 1

ER -