Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed

Cynthia M Schmidt, Roxanne R Cox, Alissa V. Fial, Teresa Hartman, Martha L. Magee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus’s author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. Methods: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. Results: We found that Scopus’s records for approximately 7% of UNMC/NM authors’ publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals’ publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. Conclusions: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus’s affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-142
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Medical Library Association
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

indexing
PubMed
medicine
Medicine
Publications
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Databases; bibliographic [mesh]
  • Efficiency, organizational [mesh]
  • Organizational affiliation [mesh]
  • Research [mesh]
  • Writing [mesh]

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed. / Schmidt, Cynthia M; Cox, Roxanne R; Fial, Alissa V.; Hartman, Teresa; Magee, Martha L.

In: Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 104, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 138-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{362327eccda04fd0a2204c25db100e6d,
title = "Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed",
abstract = "Objective: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus’s author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. Methods: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. Results: We found that Scopus’s records for approximately 7{\%} of UNMC/NM authors’ publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals’ publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. Conclusions: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus’s affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators.",
keywords = "Databases; bibliographic [mesh], Efficiency, organizational [mesh], Organizational affiliation [mesh], Research [mesh], Writing [mesh]",
author = "Schmidt, {Cynthia M} and Cox, {Roxanne R} and Fial, {Alissa V.} and Teresa Hartman and Magee, {Martha L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "138--142",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed

AU - Schmidt, Cynthia M

AU - Cox, Roxanne R

AU - Fial, Alissa V.

AU - Hartman, Teresa

AU - Magee, Martha L.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus’s author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. Methods: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. Results: We found that Scopus’s records for approximately 7% of UNMC/NM authors’ publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals’ publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. Conclusions: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus’s affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators.

AB - Objective: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus’s author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. Methods: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. Results: We found that Scopus’s records for approximately 7% of UNMC/NM authors’ publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals’ publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. Conclusions: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus’s affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators.

KW - Databases; bibliographic [mesh]

KW - Efficiency, organizational [mesh]

KW - Organizational affiliation [mesh]

KW - Research [mesh]

KW - Writing [mesh]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964335146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964335146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008

DO - 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 138

EP - 142

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 2

ER -