Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck: Comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences

Joshua A. Hirsch, Laurie A. Loevner, David M. Yousem, Evan S. Siegelman, Mark D. Keiper, Robert P. Marquis, Robert I. Grossman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced GRE and conventional SE (CSE) fat-suppressed T1-weighted techniques in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. A hybrid, opposed phase, frequency- selective, fat-suppressed fast multiplanar spoiled GRE (FMPSPGR) sequence was compared with a fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Method: Thirty-two patients with head and neck pathology were evaluated With both fat-suppressed CSE and FMPSPGR sequences. Regions of interest obtained by two viewers in consensus were used to establish contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios for both sequences. Three neuroradiologists also independently reviewed the images for quality of fat suppression, lesion conspicuity, and potential pitfalls. Results: The CNR of the FMPSPGR sequence was superior to that of the fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Subjectively, all three reviewers rated the FMPSPGR sequence as having fat suppression equal to or better than that in the CSE sequence in 94% of cases. Imaging times for the FMPSPGR sequence were 60-75% faster than those for the CSE sequence. Conclusion: Enhanced imaging of the head and neck region using an Opposed phase, fat-suppressed GRE sequence results in improved fat suppression compared with the CSE technique, with substantial savings in imaging time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-776
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 16 1998

Fingerprint

Gadolinium
Neck
Fats
Head
Noise
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Pathology

Keywords

  • Chemical shift imaging
  • Fat suppression
  • Gradient echo imaging-Head, abnormalities
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neck, abnormalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck : Comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences. / Hirsch, Joshua A.; Loevner, Laurie A.; Yousem, David M.; Siegelman, Evan S.; Keiper, Mark D.; Marquis, Robert P.; Grossman, Robert I.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 22, No. 5, 16.10.1998, p. 771-776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirsch, Joshua A. ; Loevner, Laurie A. ; Yousem, David M. ; Siegelman, Evan S. ; Keiper, Mark D. ; Marquis, Robert P. ; Grossman, Robert I. / Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck : Comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences. In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1998 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 771-776.
@article{7b4fa997a7b94a69836c5a2c95c8635d,
title = "Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck: Comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced GRE and conventional SE (CSE) fat-suppressed T1-weighted techniques in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. A hybrid, opposed phase, frequency- selective, fat-suppressed fast multiplanar spoiled GRE (FMPSPGR) sequence was compared with a fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Method: Thirty-two patients with head and neck pathology were evaluated With both fat-suppressed CSE and FMPSPGR sequences. Regions of interest obtained by two viewers in consensus were used to establish contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios for both sequences. Three neuroradiologists also independently reviewed the images for quality of fat suppression, lesion conspicuity, and potential pitfalls. Results: The CNR of the FMPSPGR sequence was superior to that of the fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Subjectively, all three reviewers rated the FMPSPGR sequence as having fat suppression equal to or better than that in the CSE sequence in 94{\%} of cases. Imaging times for the FMPSPGR sequence were 60-75{\%} faster than those for the CSE sequence. Conclusion: Enhanced imaging of the head and neck region using an Opposed phase, fat-suppressed GRE sequence results in improved fat suppression compared with the CSE technique, with substantial savings in imaging time.",
keywords = "Chemical shift imaging, Fat suppression, Gradient echo imaging-Head, abnormalities, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neck, abnormalities",
author = "Hirsch, {Joshua A.} and Loevner, {Laurie A.} and Yousem, {David M.} and Siegelman, {Evan S.} and Keiper, {Mark D.} and Marquis, {Robert P.} and Grossman, {Robert I.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1097/00004728-199809000-00020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "771--776",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck

T2 - Comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences

AU - Hirsch, Joshua A.

AU - Loevner, Laurie A.

AU - Yousem, David M.

AU - Siegelman, Evan S.

AU - Keiper, Mark D.

AU - Marquis, Robert P.

AU - Grossman, Robert I.

PY - 1998/10/16

Y1 - 1998/10/16

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced GRE and conventional SE (CSE) fat-suppressed T1-weighted techniques in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. A hybrid, opposed phase, frequency- selective, fat-suppressed fast multiplanar spoiled GRE (FMPSPGR) sequence was compared with a fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Method: Thirty-two patients with head and neck pathology were evaluated With both fat-suppressed CSE and FMPSPGR sequences. Regions of interest obtained by two viewers in consensus were used to establish contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios for both sequences. Three neuroradiologists also independently reviewed the images for quality of fat suppression, lesion conspicuity, and potential pitfalls. Results: The CNR of the FMPSPGR sequence was superior to that of the fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Subjectively, all three reviewers rated the FMPSPGR sequence as having fat suppression equal to or better than that in the CSE sequence in 94% of cases. Imaging times for the FMPSPGR sequence were 60-75% faster than those for the CSE sequence. Conclusion: Enhanced imaging of the head and neck region using an Opposed phase, fat-suppressed GRE sequence results in improved fat suppression compared with the CSE technique, with substantial savings in imaging time.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced GRE and conventional SE (CSE) fat-suppressed T1-weighted techniques in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. A hybrid, opposed phase, frequency- selective, fat-suppressed fast multiplanar spoiled GRE (FMPSPGR) sequence was compared with a fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Method: Thirty-two patients with head and neck pathology were evaluated With both fat-suppressed CSE and FMPSPGR sequences. Regions of interest obtained by two viewers in consensus were used to establish contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios for both sequences. Three neuroradiologists also independently reviewed the images for quality of fat suppression, lesion conspicuity, and potential pitfalls. Results: The CNR of the FMPSPGR sequence was superior to that of the fat-suppressed CSE sequence. Subjectively, all three reviewers rated the FMPSPGR sequence as having fat suppression equal to or better than that in the CSE sequence in 94% of cases. Imaging times for the FMPSPGR sequence were 60-75% faster than those for the CSE sequence. Conclusion: Enhanced imaging of the head and neck region using an Opposed phase, fat-suppressed GRE sequence results in improved fat suppression compared with the CSE technique, with substantial savings in imaging time.

KW - Chemical shift imaging

KW - Fat suppression

KW - Gradient echo imaging-Head, abnormalities

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Neck, abnormalities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031665383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031665383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004728-199809000-00020

DO - 10.1097/00004728-199809000-00020

M3 - Article

C2 - 9754115

AN - SCOPUS:0031665383

VL - 22

SP - 771

EP - 776

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 5

ER -