Further validation of a laboratory analog sexual aggression task: Associations with novel risk factors for sexual violence

Molly R. Franz, Michelle Haikalis, Abigail R. Riemer, Dominic J. Parrott, Sarah J Gervais, David K DiLillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Official crime statistics and self-reports of sexual aggression perpetration are limited by various factors (e.g., lack of reporting, social desirability bias), as well as an inability to use these measures in experimental studies of sexual aggression. To address these issues, Nagayama Hall et al. (1994) developed a laboratory analog measure of sexual aggression, which has received empirical support as a valid measure of sexual aggression proclivity. Here, we seek to replicate these findings and further validate the paradigm by examining sexually aggressive responses in relation to a range of recently emerging predictors of sexual aggression (e.g., sexual objectification, sexual narcissism) as well as participants' perceptions of a female confederate serving as the target of sexual aggression. A sample of 49 undergraduate men completed questionnaires and participated in the sexual aggression analog task. Results of logistic regression analyses supported both criterion and construct validity of the analog task; men who chose the sexually explicit video were more likely to report prior sexual aggression, greater sexual objectification of women, higher sexual narcissism, greater hostile sexism, and higher impersonal dating. These men were also more likely to express dehumanizing beliefs about the female confederate, consider her less intelligent, and believe she was more distressed by the video. These results replicate and extend prior research supporting this paradigm as a valid laboratory-based measure of sexual aggression proclivity that can be used in tandem with validated self-report measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-503
Number of pages18
JournalViolence and Victims
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sex Offenses
Aggression
sexual violence
aggression
Narcissism
narcissism
objectification
Self Report
video
paradigm
Social Desirability
Sexism
social desirability
sexism
Crime
construct validity
Logistic Models
logistics
statistics
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Dehumanization
  • Laboratory analog
  • Sexual aggression
  • Sexual assault
  • Sexual violence
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)
  • Law

Cite this

Further validation of a laboratory analog sexual aggression task : Associations with novel risk factors for sexual violence. / Franz, Molly R.; Haikalis, Michelle; Riemer, Abigail R.; Parrott, Dominic J.; Gervais, Sarah J; DiLillo, David K.

In: Violence and Victims, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 486-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Franz, Molly R. ; Haikalis, Michelle ; Riemer, Abigail R. ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Gervais, Sarah J ; DiLillo, David K. / Further validation of a laboratory analog sexual aggression task : Associations with novel risk factors for sexual violence. In: Violence and Victims. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 486-503.
@article{bd1bc92321ba4700b7b6be18e3b3cda0,
title = "Further validation of a laboratory analog sexual aggression task: Associations with novel risk factors for sexual violence",
abstract = "Official crime statistics and self-reports of sexual aggression perpetration are limited by various factors (e.g., lack of reporting, social desirability bias), as well as an inability to use these measures in experimental studies of sexual aggression. To address these issues, Nagayama Hall et al. (1994) developed a laboratory analog measure of sexual aggression, which has received empirical support as a valid measure of sexual aggression proclivity. Here, we seek to replicate these findings and further validate the paradigm by examining sexually aggressive responses in relation to a range of recently emerging predictors of sexual aggression (e.g., sexual objectification, sexual narcissism) as well as participants' perceptions of a female confederate serving as the target of sexual aggression. A sample of 49 undergraduate men completed questionnaires and participated in the sexual aggression analog task. Results of logistic regression analyses supported both criterion and construct validity of the analog task; men who chose the sexually explicit video were more likely to report prior sexual aggression, greater sexual objectification of women, higher sexual narcissism, greater hostile sexism, and higher impersonal dating. These men were also more likely to express dehumanizing beliefs about the female confederate, consider her less intelligent, and believe she was more distressed by the video. These results replicate and extend prior research supporting this paradigm as a valid laboratory-based measure of sexual aggression proclivity that can be used in tandem with validated self-report measures.",
keywords = "Dehumanization, Laboratory analog, Sexual aggression, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Validity",
author = "Franz, {Molly R.} and Michelle Haikalis and Riemer, {Abigail R.} and Parrott, {Dominic J.} and Gervais, {Sarah J} and DiLillo, {David K}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "486--503",
journal = "Violence and Victims",
issn = "0886-6708",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further validation of a laboratory analog sexual aggression task

T2 - Associations with novel risk factors for sexual violence

AU - Franz, Molly R.

AU - Haikalis, Michelle

AU - Riemer, Abigail R.

AU - Parrott, Dominic J.

AU - Gervais, Sarah J

AU - DiLillo, David K

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Official crime statistics and self-reports of sexual aggression perpetration are limited by various factors (e.g., lack of reporting, social desirability bias), as well as an inability to use these measures in experimental studies of sexual aggression. To address these issues, Nagayama Hall et al. (1994) developed a laboratory analog measure of sexual aggression, which has received empirical support as a valid measure of sexual aggression proclivity. Here, we seek to replicate these findings and further validate the paradigm by examining sexually aggressive responses in relation to a range of recently emerging predictors of sexual aggression (e.g., sexual objectification, sexual narcissism) as well as participants' perceptions of a female confederate serving as the target of sexual aggression. A sample of 49 undergraduate men completed questionnaires and participated in the sexual aggression analog task. Results of logistic regression analyses supported both criterion and construct validity of the analog task; men who chose the sexually explicit video were more likely to report prior sexual aggression, greater sexual objectification of women, higher sexual narcissism, greater hostile sexism, and higher impersonal dating. These men were also more likely to express dehumanizing beliefs about the female confederate, consider her less intelligent, and believe she was more distressed by the video. These results replicate and extend prior research supporting this paradigm as a valid laboratory-based measure of sexual aggression proclivity that can be used in tandem with validated self-report measures.

AB - Official crime statistics and self-reports of sexual aggression perpetration are limited by various factors (e.g., lack of reporting, social desirability bias), as well as an inability to use these measures in experimental studies of sexual aggression. To address these issues, Nagayama Hall et al. (1994) developed a laboratory analog measure of sexual aggression, which has received empirical support as a valid measure of sexual aggression proclivity. Here, we seek to replicate these findings and further validate the paradigm by examining sexually aggressive responses in relation to a range of recently emerging predictors of sexual aggression (e.g., sexual objectification, sexual narcissism) as well as participants' perceptions of a female confederate serving as the target of sexual aggression. A sample of 49 undergraduate men completed questionnaires and participated in the sexual aggression analog task. Results of logistic regression analyses supported both criterion and construct validity of the analog task; men who chose the sexually explicit video were more likely to report prior sexual aggression, greater sexual objectification of women, higher sexual narcissism, greater hostile sexism, and higher impersonal dating. These men were also more likely to express dehumanizing beliefs about the female confederate, consider her less intelligent, and believe she was more distressed by the video. These results replicate and extend prior research supporting this paradigm as a valid laboratory-based measure of sexual aggression proclivity that can be used in tandem with validated self-report measures.

KW - Dehumanization

KW - Laboratory analog

KW - Sexual aggression

KW - Sexual assault

KW - Sexual violence

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048658067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048658067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00064

DO - 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00064

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 486

EP - 503

JO - Violence and Victims

JF - Violence and Victims

SN - 0886-6708

IS - 3

ER -