Further examina tion of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement

Tiffany Kodak, Dorothea C. Lerman, Valerie M. Volkert, Nicole Trosclair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Factors that influence choice between qualitatively different reinforcers (e.g., a food item or a break from work) are important to consider when arranging treatments for problem behavior. Previous findings indicate that children who engage in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands may choose a food item over the functional reinforcer during treatment (DeLeon, Neidert, Anders, & Rodriguez-Catter, 2001; Lalli et al., 1999). However, a number of variables may influence choice between concurrently available forms of reinforcement. An analogue for treatment situations in which positive reinforcement for compliance is in direct competition with negative reinforcement for problem behavior was used in the current study to evaluate several variables that may influence choice. Participants were 5 children who had been diagnosed with developmental disabilities and who engaged in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands. In the first phase, the effects of task preference and schedule of reinforcement on choice between a 30-s break and a high-preference food item were evaluated. The food item was preferred over the break, regardless of the preference level of the task or the reinforcement schedule, for all but 1 participant. In the second phase, the quality of the break was manipulated by combining escape with toys, attention, or both. Only 1 participant showed preference for the enriched break. In the third phase, choice of a medium- or low-preference food item versus the enriched break was evaluated. Three of 4 participants showed preference for the break over the less preferred food item. Results extend previous research by identifying some of the conditions under which individuals who engage in escape-maintained behavior will prefer a food reinforcer over the functional one.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-44
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

reinforcement
food
Food
Reinforcement Schedule
Food Preferences
Play and Playthings
Developmental Disabilities
Compliance
toy
Therapeutics
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement
Problem Behavior
disability
Research
Behavior Problems

Keywords

  • Behavioral economics
  • Choice
  • Differential reinforcement
  • Escape-maintained behavior
  • Negative reinforcement
  • Positive reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Further examina tion of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement. / Kodak, Tiffany; Lerman, Dorothea C.; Volkert, Valerie M.; Trosclair, Nicole.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.03.2007, p. 25-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kodak, Tiffany ; Lerman, Dorothea C. ; Volkert, Valerie M. ; Trosclair, Nicole. / Further examina tion of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 2007 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 25-44.
@article{b1526b9541444f08877297b3c9a2a557,
title = "Further examina tion of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement",
abstract = "Factors that influence choice between qualitatively different reinforcers (e.g., a food item or a break from work) are important to consider when arranging treatments for problem behavior. Previous findings indicate that children who engage in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands may choose a food item over the functional reinforcer during treatment (DeLeon, Neidert, Anders, & Rodriguez-Catter, 2001; Lalli et al., 1999). However, a number of variables may influence choice between concurrently available forms of reinforcement. An analogue for treatment situations in which positive reinforcement for compliance is in direct competition with negative reinforcement for problem behavior was used in the current study to evaluate several variables that may influence choice. Participants were 5 children who had been diagnosed with developmental disabilities and who engaged in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands. In the first phase, the effects of task preference and schedule of reinforcement on choice between a 30-s break and a high-preference food item were evaluated. The food item was preferred over the break, regardless of the preference level of the task or the reinforcement schedule, for all but 1 participant. In the second phase, the quality of the break was manipulated by combining escape with toys, attention, or both. Only 1 participant showed preference for the enriched break. In the third phase, choice of a medium- or low-preference food item versus the enriched break was evaluated. Three of 4 participants showed preference for the break over the less preferred food item. Results extend previous research by identifying some of the conditions under which individuals who engage in escape-maintained behavior will prefer a food reinforcer over the functional one.",
keywords = "Behavioral economics, Choice, Differential reinforcement, Escape-maintained behavior, Negative reinforcement, Positive reinforcement",
author = "Tiffany Kodak and Lerman, {Dorothea C.} and Volkert, {Valerie M.} and Nicole Trosclair",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "25--44",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further examina tion of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement

AU - Kodak, Tiffany

AU - Lerman, Dorothea C.

AU - Volkert, Valerie M.

AU - Trosclair, Nicole

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - Factors that influence choice between qualitatively different reinforcers (e.g., a food item or a break from work) are important to consider when arranging treatments for problem behavior. Previous findings indicate that children who engage in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands may choose a food item over the functional reinforcer during treatment (DeLeon, Neidert, Anders, & Rodriguez-Catter, 2001; Lalli et al., 1999). However, a number of variables may influence choice between concurrently available forms of reinforcement. An analogue for treatment situations in which positive reinforcement for compliance is in direct competition with negative reinforcement for problem behavior was used in the current study to evaluate several variables that may influence choice. Participants were 5 children who had been diagnosed with developmental disabilities and who engaged in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands. In the first phase, the effects of task preference and schedule of reinforcement on choice between a 30-s break and a high-preference food item were evaluated. The food item was preferred over the break, regardless of the preference level of the task or the reinforcement schedule, for all but 1 participant. In the second phase, the quality of the break was manipulated by combining escape with toys, attention, or both. Only 1 participant showed preference for the enriched break. In the third phase, choice of a medium- or low-preference food item versus the enriched break was evaluated. Three of 4 participants showed preference for the break over the less preferred food item. Results extend previous research by identifying some of the conditions under which individuals who engage in escape-maintained behavior will prefer a food reinforcer over the functional one.

AB - Factors that influence choice between qualitatively different reinforcers (e.g., a food item or a break from work) are important to consider when arranging treatments for problem behavior. Previous findings indicate that children who engage in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands may choose a food item over the functional reinforcer during treatment (DeLeon, Neidert, Anders, & Rodriguez-Catter, 2001; Lalli et al., 1999). However, a number of variables may influence choice between concurrently available forms of reinforcement. An analogue for treatment situations in which positive reinforcement for compliance is in direct competition with negative reinforcement for problem behavior was used in the current study to evaluate several variables that may influence choice. Participants were 5 children who had been diagnosed with developmental disabilities and who engaged in problem behavior maintained by escape from demands. In the first phase, the effects of task preference and schedule of reinforcement on choice between a 30-s break and a high-preference food item were evaluated. The food item was preferred over the break, regardless of the preference level of the task or the reinforcement schedule, for all but 1 participant. In the second phase, the quality of the break was manipulated by combining escape with toys, attention, or both. Only 1 participant showed preference for the enriched break. In the third phase, choice of a medium- or low-preference food item versus the enriched break was evaluated. Three of 4 participants showed preference for the break over the less preferred food item. Results extend previous research by identifying some of the conditions under which individuals who engage in escape-maintained behavior will prefer a food reinforcer over the functional one.

KW - Behavioral economics

KW - Choice

KW - Differential reinforcement

KW - Escape-maintained behavior

KW - Negative reinforcement

KW - Positive reinforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347209424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347209424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05

M3 - Article

C2 - 17471792

AN - SCOPUS:34347209424

VL - 40

SP - 25

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 1

ER -