From signal to analytical reporting for allergen detection by mass spectrometry

Philip E. Johnson, Melanie Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

MS offers a flexible and precise alternative to traditional methods for allergen detection and quantitation. However, this flexibility also engenders many ways of acquiring information and translating it to simple, clear data useful to end-users. Currently, methods for performing data analysis for allergen detection by MS are unstandardized, and it is therefore difficult to compare different analytical methods. We identify three key components of data analysis: detection of positive signals, calibration, and signal integration. For each of these components, there are multiple pathways available for method developers. We discuss these alternative methods, giving examples from literature. Assuming that the end result of an allergen analysis should be clear, unambiguous, and understandable to all relevant stakeholders, we pay particular attention to the consequences of each choice to the analysis in question and, where appropriate, suggest best practices. We also identify data analysis criteria that should be clearly delineated in the reporting of a method. Establishment of community-wide standards for unambiguous reporting of data analysis workflows will improve the evaluation, comparability, and transferability of methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1255-1262
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of AOAC International
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

allergens
Allergens
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry
mass spectrometry
data analysis
methodology
Calibration
Workflow
stakeholders
analytical methods
detection
allergen
method
analytical method
Practice Guidelines
stakeholder
calibration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Food Science
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

From signal to analytical reporting for allergen detection by mass spectrometry. / Johnson, Philip E.; Downs, Melanie.

In: Journal of AOAC International, Vol. 102, No. 5, 01.01.2019, p. 1255-1262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f85f0fe318a4428b72cbebf8c7a8e59,
title = "From signal to analytical reporting for allergen detection by mass spectrometry",
abstract = "MS offers a flexible and precise alternative to traditional methods for allergen detection and quantitation. However, this flexibility also engenders many ways of acquiring information and translating it to simple, clear data useful to end-users. Currently, methods for performing data analysis for allergen detection by MS are unstandardized, and it is therefore difficult to compare different analytical methods. We identify three key components of data analysis: detection of positive signals, calibration, and signal integration. For each of these components, there are multiple pathways available for method developers. We discuss these alternative methods, giving examples from literature. Assuming that the end result of an allergen analysis should be clear, unambiguous, and understandable to all relevant stakeholders, we pay particular attention to the consequences of each choice to the analysis in question and, where appropriate, suggest best practices. We also identify data analysis criteria that should be clearly delineated in the reporting of a method. Establishment of community-wide standards for unambiguous reporting of data analysis workflows will improve the evaluation, comparability, and transferability of methods.",
author = "Johnson, {Philip E.} and Melanie Downs",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5740/jaoacint.19-0053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1255--1262",
journal = "Journal of AOAC International",
issn = "1060-3271",
publisher = "AOAC International",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From signal to analytical reporting for allergen detection by mass spectrometry

AU - Johnson, Philip E.

AU - Downs, Melanie

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - MS offers a flexible and precise alternative to traditional methods for allergen detection and quantitation. However, this flexibility also engenders many ways of acquiring information and translating it to simple, clear data useful to end-users. Currently, methods for performing data analysis for allergen detection by MS are unstandardized, and it is therefore difficult to compare different analytical methods. We identify three key components of data analysis: detection of positive signals, calibration, and signal integration. For each of these components, there are multiple pathways available for method developers. We discuss these alternative methods, giving examples from literature. Assuming that the end result of an allergen analysis should be clear, unambiguous, and understandable to all relevant stakeholders, we pay particular attention to the consequences of each choice to the analysis in question and, where appropriate, suggest best practices. We also identify data analysis criteria that should be clearly delineated in the reporting of a method. Establishment of community-wide standards for unambiguous reporting of data analysis workflows will improve the evaluation, comparability, and transferability of methods.

AB - MS offers a flexible and precise alternative to traditional methods for allergen detection and quantitation. However, this flexibility also engenders many ways of acquiring information and translating it to simple, clear data useful to end-users. Currently, methods for performing data analysis for allergen detection by MS are unstandardized, and it is therefore difficult to compare different analytical methods. We identify three key components of data analysis: detection of positive signals, calibration, and signal integration. For each of these components, there are multiple pathways available for method developers. We discuss these alternative methods, giving examples from literature. Assuming that the end result of an allergen analysis should be clear, unambiguous, and understandable to all relevant stakeholders, we pay particular attention to the consequences of each choice to the analysis in question and, where appropriate, suggest best practices. We also identify data analysis criteria that should be clearly delineated in the reporting of a method. Establishment of community-wide standards for unambiguous reporting of data analysis workflows will improve the evaluation, comparability, and transferability of methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072529078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072529078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5740/jaoacint.19-0053

DO - 10.5740/jaoacint.19-0053

M3 - Article

C2 - 30890203

AN - SCOPUS:85072529078

VL - 102

SP - 1255

EP - 1262

JO - Journal of AOAC International

JF - Journal of AOAC International

SN - 1060-3271

IS - 5

ER -