From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.

Tom P. Aufderheide, Carly Alexander, Charles Lick, Brent Myers, Laurie Romig, Levon Vartanian, Joseph Stothert, Scott McKnite, Tim Matsuura, Demetris Yannopoulos, Keith Lurie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe a newly mechanism of blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the impedance threshold device in a piglet model of cardiac arrest, and 2) describe the survival benefits in humans of applying all of the highly recommended changes in the 2005 guidelines related to increasing circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including use of the impedance threshold device, from six emergency medical services systems in the United States. DESIGN: Animal studies prospective trial with each piglet serving as its own control. Historical controls were used for the human studies. SUBJECTS: Piglets and patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Piglets (10-12 kg) were treated with an active (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) impedance threshold device after 6 mins of ventricular fibrillation. Humans were treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation per the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines and the impedance threshold device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Animals: The primary endpoint in the piglet study was carotid blood flow which increased from 59 mL/min without an impedance threshold device to 91 mL/min (p = 0.017) with impedance threshold device use. Airway pressures during the chest recoil phase decreased from -0.46 mm Hg to -2.59 mm Hg (p = 0.0006) with the active impedance threshold device. Intracranial pressure decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the active impedance threshold device. Humans: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed from six emergency medical services systems in the United States serving a population of approximately 3 million people. There were 920 patients treated for cardiac arrest after implementation of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines, including impedance threshold device use, and 1750 patients in the control group during the year before implementation. Demographics were similar between the two groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 9.3% in the control group versus 13.6% in the intervention group. The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p value were 1.54 (1.19-1.99) and p = 0.0008, respectively. This survival advantage was conferred to patients with a presenting cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (28.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the impedance threshold device in piglets increased carotid blood flow and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and reduced intracranial pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a faster rate than controls, resulting in a longer duration of time when intracranial pressures are at their nadir. Patients in six emergency medical services systems treated with the impedance threshold device together with the renewed emphasis on more compressions, fewer ventilations, and complete chest wall recoil had a nearly 50% increase in survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S397-404
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume36
Issue number11 Suppl
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Emergency Medical Services
Heart Arrest
Electric Impedance
Survival Rate
Equipment and Supplies
Intracranial Pressure
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Ventricular Fibrillation
Guidelines
Decompression
Survival
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Control Groups
Thoracic Wall
Ventilation
Thorax
Odds Ratio
Demography
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems : New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest. / Aufderheide, Tom P.; Alexander, Carly; Lick, Charles; Myers, Brent; Romig, Laurie; Vartanian, Levon; Stothert, Joseph; McKnite, Scott; Matsuura, Tim; Yannopoulos, Demetris; Lurie, Keith.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 36, No. 11 Suppl, 11.2008, p. S397-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aufderheide, TP, Alexander, C, Lick, C, Myers, B, Romig, L, Vartanian, L, Stothert, J, McKnite, S, Matsuura, T, Yannopoulos, D & Lurie, K 2008, 'From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.', Critical care medicine, vol. 36, no. 11 Suppl, pp. S397-404.
Aufderheide, Tom P. ; Alexander, Carly ; Lick, Charles ; Myers, Brent ; Romig, Laurie ; Vartanian, Levon ; Stothert, Joseph ; McKnite, Scott ; Matsuura, Tim ; Yannopoulos, Demetris ; Lurie, Keith. / From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems : New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest. In: Critical care medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 11 Suppl. pp. S397-404.
@article{69858245bb544c738a9a8056302ecfd3,
title = "From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe a newly mechanism of blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the impedance threshold device in a piglet model of cardiac arrest, and 2) describe the survival benefits in humans of applying all of the highly recommended changes in the 2005 guidelines related to increasing circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including use of the impedance threshold device, from six emergency medical services systems in the United States. DESIGN: Animal studies prospective trial with each piglet serving as its own control. Historical controls were used for the human studies. SUBJECTS: Piglets and patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Piglets (10-12 kg) were treated with an active (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) impedance threshold device after 6 mins of ventricular fibrillation. Humans were treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation per the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines and the impedance threshold device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Animals: The primary endpoint in the piglet study was carotid blood flow which increased from 59 mL/min without an impedance threshold device to 91 mL/min (p = 0.017) with impedance threshold device use. Airway pressures during the chest recoil phase decreased from -0.46 mm Hg to -2.59 mm Hg (p = 0.0006) with the active impedance threshold device. Intracranial pressure decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the active impedance threshold device. Humans: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed from six emergency medical services systems in the United States serving a population of approximately 3 million people. There were 920 patients treated for cardiac arrest after implementation of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines, including impedance threshold device use, and 1750 patients in the control group during the year before implementation. Demographics were similar between the two groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 9.3{\%} in the control group versus 13.6{\%} in the intervention group. The odds ratio, 95{\%} confidence interval, and p value were 1.54 (1.19-1.99) and p = 0.0008, respectively. This survival advantage was conferred to patients with a presenting cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (28.5{\%} vs. 18.0{\%}, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the impedance threshold device in piglets increased carotid blood flow and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and reduced intracranial pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a faster rate than controls, resulting in a longer duration of time when intracranial pressures are at their nadir. Patients in six emergency medical services systems treated with the impedance threshold device together with the renewed emphasis on more compressions, fewer ventilations, and complete chest wall recoil had a nearly 50{\%} increase in survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.",
author = "Aufderheide, {Tom P.} and Carly Alexander and Charles Lick and Brent Myers and Laurie Romig and Levon Vartanian and Joseph Stothert and Scott McKnite and Tim Matsuura and Demetris Yannopoulos and Keith Lurie",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "S397--404",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11 Suppl",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems

T2 - New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.

AU - Aufderheide, Tom P.

AU - Alexander, Carly

AU - Lick, Charles

AU - Myers, Brent

AU - Romig, Laurie

AU - Vartanian, Levon

AU - Stothert, Joseph

AU - McKnite, Scott

AU - Matsuura, Tim

AU - Yannopoulos, Demetris

AU - Lurie, Keith

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe a newly mechanism of blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the impedance threshold device in a piglet model of cardiac arrest, and 2) describe the survival benefits in humans of applying all of the highly recommended changes in the 2005 guidelines related to increasing circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including use of the impedance threshold device, from six emergency medical services systems in the United States. DESIGN: Animal studies prospective trial with each piglet serving as its own control. Historical controls were used for the human studies. SUBJECTS: Piglets and patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Piglets (10-12 kg) were treated with an active (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) impedance threshold device after 6 mins of ventricular fibrillation. Humans were treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation per the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines and the impedance threshold device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Animals: The primary endpoint in the piglet study was carotid blood flow which increased from 59 mL/min without an impedance threshold device to 91 mL/min (p = 0.017) with impedance threshold device use. Airway pressures during the chest recoil phase decreased from -0.46 mm Hg to -2.59 mm Hg (p = 0.0006) with the active impedance threshold device. Intracranial pressure decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the active impedance threshold device. Humans: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed from six emergency medical services systems in the United States serving a population of approximately 3 million people. There were 920 patients treated for cardiac arrest after implementation of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines, including impedance threshold device use, and 1750 patients in the control group during the year before implementation. Demographics were similar between the two groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 9.3% in the control group versus 13.6% in the intervention group. The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p value were 1.54 (1.19-1.99) and p = 0.0008, respectively. This survival advantage was conferred to patients with a presenting cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (28.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the impedance threshold device in piglets increased carotid blood flow and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and reduced intracranial pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a faster rate than controls, resulting in a longer duration of time when intracranial pressures are at their nadir. Patients in six emergency medical services systems treated with the impedance threshold device together with the renewed emphasis on more compressions, fewer ventilations, and complete chest wall recoil had a nearly 50% increase in survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe a newly mechanism of blood flow to the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the impedance threshold device in a piglet model of cardiac arrest, and 2) describe the survival benefits in humans of applying all of the highly recommended changes in the 2005 guidelines related to increasing circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including use of the impedance threshold device, from six emergency medical services systems in the United States. DESIGN: Animal studies prospective trial with each piglet serving as its own control. Historical controls were used for the human studies. SUBJECTS: Piglets and patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Piglets (10-12 kg) were treated with an active (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) impedance threshold device after 6 mins of ventricular fibrillation. Humans were treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation per the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines and the impedance threshold device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Animals: The primary endpoint in the piglet study was carotid blood flow which increased from 59 mL/min without an impedance threshold device to 91 mL/min (p = 0.017) with impedance threshold device use. Airway pressures during the chest recoil phase decreased from -0.46 mm Hg to -2.59 mm Hg (p = 0.0006) with the active impedance threshold device. Intracranial pressure decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the active impedance threshold device. Humans: Conglomerate quality assurance data were analyzed from six emergency medical services systems in the United States serving a population of approximately 3 million people. There were 920 patients treated for cardiac arrest after implementation of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines, including impedance threshold device use, and 1750 patients in the control group during the year before implementation. Demographics were similar between the two groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 9.3% in the control group versus 13.6% in the intervention group. The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p value were 1.54 (1.19-1.99) and p = 0.0008, respectively. This survival advantage was conferred to patients with a presenting cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (28.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the impedance threshold device in piglets increased carotid blood flow and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and reduced intracranial pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a faster rate than controls, resulting in a longer duration of time when intracranial pressures are at their nadir. Patients in six emergency medical services systems treated with the impedance threshold device together with the renewed emphasis on more compressions, fewer ventilations, and complete chest wall recoil had a nearly 50% increase in survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71649088532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71649088532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20449900

AN - SCOPUS:71649088532

VL - 36

SP - S397-404

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 11 Suppl

ER -