Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons

Sophie Birot, Amélie Crépet, Benjamin C. Remington, Charlotte B. Madsen, Astrid G. Kruizinga, Joseph L. Baumert, Per B. Brockhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number18206
JournalScientific reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Allergens
Uncertainty
Food
Hypersensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment : risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons. / Birot, Sophie; Crépet, Amélie; Remington, Benjamin C.; Madsen, Charlotte B.; Kruizinga, Astrid G.; Baumert, Joseph L.; Brockhoff, Per B.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 18206, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Birot, Sophie ; Crépet, Amélie ; Remington, Benjamin C. ; Madsen, Charlotte B. ; Kruizinga, Astrid G. ; Baumert, Joseph L. ; Brockhoff, Per B. / Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment : risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons. In: Scientific reports. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{3392acb945194e12ae6ade5a49344b38,
title = "Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons",
abstract = "Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5{\%} with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.",
author = "Sophie Birot and Am{\'e}lie Cr{\'e}pet and Remington, {Benjamin C.} and Madsen, {Charlotte B.} and Kruizinga, {Astrid G.} and Baumert, {Joseph L.} and Brockhoff, {Per B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment

T2 - risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons

AU - Birot, Sophie

AU - Crépet, Amélie

AU - Remington, Benjamin C.

AU - Madsen, Charlotte B.

AU - Kruizinga, Astrid G.

AU - Baumert, Joseph L.

AU - Brockhoff, Per B.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.

AB - Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075917724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075917724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 31796875

AN - SCOPUS:85075917724

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 18206

ER -