Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism

Robert Futrell, Pete Simi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing upon participant observation and interviews with white power movement (WPM) activists, this article explains how members materialize, communicate, and sustain white power identities under highly antagonistic social conditions. We emphasize the role of the movement's free spaces in movement persistence. In particular, we contrast the social ties and cultural practices that various types of free spaces in the movement both enable and inhibit. WPM. members construct two main types of free space. "Indigenous-prefigurative" spaces involve small, local networks where political socialization, boundary marking, and other cultural practices allow members to participate in relationships that "prefigure" Aryan dominance. These practices are collapsed into otherwise benign, everyday activities in settings such as family homes, Bible study groups, informal parties, and crashpads, where members perform them in relative safety from social controls. "Transmovement-prefigurative spaces" offer opportunities to draw otherwise unconnected local actors and networks into broader webs of white power culture. Intentional Aryan communities, music festivals, and Cyberspace connect individuals to extra-local movement networks which help reinforce solidarity and commitment to the WPM. These free spaces contribute to the persistence of white power activism by creating a bi-leveled infrastructure of spaces that support distinct kinds of network ties and practices to sustain collective identity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-42
Number of pages27
JournalSocial Problems
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

collective identity
persistence
political socialization
festival
study group
bible
social control
virtual reality
participant observation
solidarity
social factors
music
commitment
infrastructure
interview
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism. / Futrell, Robert; Simi, Pete.

In: Social Problems, Vol. 51, No. 1, 02.2004, p. 16-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Futrell, Robert ; Simi, Pete. / Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism. In: Social Problems. 2004 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 16-42.
@article{6b7094119b6b42648a5a4c832f41b8fa,
title = "Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism",
abstract = "Drawing upon participant observation and interviews with white power movement (WPM) activists, this article explains how members materialize, communicate, and sustain white power identities under highly antagonistic social conditions. We emphasize the role of the movement's free spaces in movement persistence. In particular, we contrast the social ties and cultural practices that various types of free spaces in the movement both enable and inhibit. WPM. members construct two main types of free space. {"}Indigenous-prefigurative{"} spaces involve small, local networks where political socialization, boundary marking, and other cultural practices allow members to participate in relationships that {"}prefigure{"} Aryan dominance. These practices are collapsed into otherwise benign, everyday activities in settings such as family homes, Bible study groups, informal parties, and crashpads, where members perform them in relative safety from social controls. {"}Transmovement-prefigurative spaces{"} offer opportunities to draw otherwise unconnected local actors and networks into broader webs of white power culture. Intentional Aryan communities, music festivals, and Cyberspace connect individuals to extra-local movement networks which help reinforce solidarity and commitment to the WPM. These free spaces contribute to the persistence of white power activism by creating a bi-leveled infrastructure of spaces that support distinct kinds of network ties and practices to sustain collective identity.",
author = "Robert Futrell and Pete Simi",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "16--42",
journal = "Social Problems",
issn = "0037-7791",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism

AU - Futrell, Robert

AU - Simi, Pete

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Drawing upon participant observation and interviews with white power movement (WPM) activists, this article explains how members materialize, communicate, and sustain white power identities under highly antagonistic social conditions. We emphasize the role of the movement's free spaces in movement persistence. In particular, we contrast the social ties and cultural practices that various types of free spaces in the movement both enable and inhibit. WPM. members construct two main types of free space. "Indigenous-prefigurative" spaces involve small, local networks where political socialization, boundary marking, and other cultural practices allow members to participate in relationships that "prefigure" Aryan dominance. These practices are collapsed into otherwise benign, everyday activities in settings such as family homes, Bible study groups, informal parties, and crashpads, where members perform them in relative safety from social controls. "Transmovement-prefigurative spaces" offer opportunities to draw otherwise unconnected local actors and networks into broader webs of white power culture. Intentional Aryan communities, music festivals, and Cyberspace connect individuals to extra-local movement networks which help reinforce solidarity and commitment to the WPM. These free spaces contribute to the persistence of white power activism by creating a bi-leveled infrastructure of spaces that support distinct kinds of network ties and practices to sustain collective identity.

AB - Drawing upon participant observation and interviews with white power movement (WPM) activists, this article explains how members materialize, communicate, and sustain white power identities under highly antagonistic social conditions. We emphasize the role of the movement's free spaces in movement persistence. In particular, we contrast the social ties and cultural practices that various types of free spaces in the movement both enable and inhibit. WPM. members construct two main types of free space. "Indigenous-prefigurative" spaces involve small, local networks where political socialization, boundary marking, and other cultural practices allow members to participate in relationships that "prefigure" Aryan dominance. These practices are collapsed into otherwise benign, everyday activities in settings such as family homes, Bible study groups, informal parties, and crashpads, where members perform them in relative safety from social controls. "Transmovement-prefigurative spaces" offer opportunities to draw otherwise unconnected local actors and networks into broader webs of white power culture. Intentional Aryan communities, music festivals, and Cyberspace connect individuals to extra-local movement networks which help reinforce solidarity and commitment to the WPM. These free spaces contribute to the persistence of white power activism by creating a bi-leveled infrastructure of spaces that support distinct kinds of network ties and practices to sustain collective identity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542351103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542351103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.16

DO - 10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.16

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1542351103

VL - 51

SP - 16

EP - 42

JO - Social Problems

JF - Social Problems

SN - 0037-7791

IS - 1

ER -