Forgetting the Once-Seen Face: Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness's Memory Representation

Kenneth A. Deffenbacher, Brian H Bornstein, E. Kiernan McGorty, Steven D. Penrod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fidelity of an eyewitness's memory representation is an issue of paramount forensic concern. Psychological science has been unable to offer more than vague generalities concerning the relation of retention interval to memory trace strength for the once-seen face. A meta-analysis of 53 facial memory studies produced a highly reliable association (r = .18, d = 0.37) between longer retention intervals and positive forgetting of once-seen faces, an effect equally strong for both face recognition and eyewitness identification studies. W. A. Wickelgren's (1974, 1975, 1977) theory of recognition memory provided statistically satisfactory fits to 11 different empirical forgetting functions. Applied to the results of field studies of eyewitness memory, the theory yields predictions relevant to fact finders' evaluations of eyewitness credibility. A plausible upper limit for witness initial memory strength corresponds to a probability of .67 of being correct on a fair six-person lineup. Furthermore, not only can the percentage of remaining memory strength be determined for any retention interval, but this strength estimate can be translated into an estimated probability of being correct on a fair lineup of a specified size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-150
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Psychology
Retention (Psychology)
Recognition (Psychology)
Facial Recognition

Keywords

  • eyewitness memory strength
  • forgetting of faces
  • retention interval
  • single-trace fragility theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Forgetting the Once-Seen Face : Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness's Memory Representation. / Deffenbacher, Kenneth A.; Bornstein, Brian H; McGorty, E. Kiernan; Penrod, Steven D.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 139-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deffenbacher, Kenneth A. ; Bornstein, Brian H ; McGorty, E. Kiernan ; Penrod, Steven D. / Forgetting the Once-Seen Face : Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness's Memory Representation. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 139-150.
@article{07780b6f71994539aa2ab03cd93b0bec,
title = "Forgetting the Once-Seen Face: Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness's Memory Representation",
abstract = "The fidelity of an eyewitness's memory representation is an issue of paramount forensic concern. Psychological science has been unable to offer more than vague generalities concerning the relation of retention interval to memory trace strength for the once-seen face. A meta-analysis of 53 facial memory studies produced a highly reliable association (r = .18, d = 0.37) between longer retention intervals and positive forgetting of once-seen faces, an effect equally strong for both face recognition and eyewitness identification studies. W. A. Wickelgren's (1974, 1975, 1977) theory of recognition memory provided statistically satisfactory fits to 11 different empirical forgetting functions. Applied to the results of field studies of eyewitness memory, the theory yields predictions relevant to fact finders' evaluations of eyewitness credibility. A plausible upper limit for witness initial memory strength corresponds to a probability of .67 of being correct on a fair six-person lineup. Furthermore, not only can the percentage of remaining memory strength be determined for any retention interval, but this strength estimate can be translated into an estimated probability of being correct on a fair lineup of a specified size.",
keywords = "eyewitness memory strength, forgetting of faces, retention interval, single-trace fragility theory",
author = "Deffenbacher, {Kenneth A.} and Bornstein, {Brian H} and McGorty, {E. Kiernan} and Penrod, {Steven D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "139--150",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied",
issn = "1076-898X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forgetting the Once-Seen Face

T2 - Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness's Memory Representation

AU - Deffenbacher, Kenneth A.

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

AU - McGorty, E. Kiernan

AU - Penrod, Steven D.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - The fidelity of an eyewitness's memory representation is an issue of paramount forensic concern. Psychological science has been unable to offer more than vague generalities concerning the relation of retention interval to memory trace strength for the once-seen face. A meta-analysis of 53 facial memory studies produced a highly reliable association (r = .18, d = 0.37) between longer retention intervals and positive forgetting of once-seen faces, an effect equally strong for both face recognition and eyewitness identification studies. W. A. Wickelgren's (1974, 1975, 1977) theory of recognition memory provided statistically satisfactory fits to 11 different empirical forgetting functions. Applied to the results of field studies of eyewitness memory, the theory yields predictions relevant to fact finders' evaluations of eyewitness credibility. A plausible upper limit for witness initial memory strength corresponds to a probability of .67 of being correct on a fair six-person lineup. Furthermore, not only can the percentage of remaining memory strength be determined for any retention interval, but this strength estimate can be translated into an estimated probability of being correct on a fair lineup of a specified size.

AB - The fidelity of an eyewitness's memory representation is an issue of paramount forensic concern. Psychological science has been unable to offer more than vague generalities concerning the relation of retention interval to memory trace strength for the once-seen face. A meta-analysis of 53 facial memory studies produced a highly reliable association (r = .18, d = 0.37) between longer retention intervals and positive forgetting of once-seen faces, an effect equally strong for both face recognition and eyewitness identification studies. W. A. Wickelgren's (1974, 1975, 1977) theory of recognition memory provided statistically satisfactory fits to 11 different empirical forgetting functions. Applied to the results of field studies of eyewitness memory, the theory yields predictions relevant to fact finders' evaluations of eyewitness credibility. A plausible upper limit for witness initial memory strength corresponds to a probability of .67 of being correct on a fair six-person lineup. Furthermore, not only can the percentage of remaining memory strength be determined for any retention interval, but this strength estimate can be translated into an estimated probability of being correct on a fair lineup of a specified size.

KW - eyewitness memory strength

KW - forgetting of faces

KW - retention interval

KW - single-trace fragility theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47049126917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47049126917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139

DO - 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139

M3 - Article

C2 - 18590370

AN - SCOPUS:47049126917

VL - 14

SP - 139

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

SN - 1076-898X

IS - 2

ER -