Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies

Jeffrey R. Stevens, Jenny Volstorf, Lael J. Schooler, Jörg Rieskamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical studies of cooperative behavior have focused on decision strategies that depend on a partner's last choices. The findings from this work assume that players accurately remember past actions. The kind of memory that these strategies employ, however, does not reflect what we know about memory. Here, we show that human memory may not meet the requirements needed to use these strategies. When asked to recall the previous behavior of simulated partners in a cooperative memory task, participants performed poorly, making errors in 10-24% of the trials. Participants made more errors when required to track more partners. We conducted agent-based simulations to evaluate how well cooperative strategies cope with error. These simulations suggest that, even with few errors, cooperation could not be maintained at the error rates demonstrated by our participants. Our results indicate that the strategies typically used in the study of cooperation likely do not reflect the underlying cognitive capacities used by humans and other animals in social interactions. By including unrealistic assumptions about cognition, theoretical models may have overestimated the robustness of the existing cooperative strategies. To remedy this, future models should incorporate what we know about cognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberArticle 235
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume1
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cognition
Theoretical Models
Interpersonal Relations
Cooperative Behavior

Keywords

  • Agent-based simulation
  • Cooperation
  • Decision strategy
  • Forgetting
  • Memory
  • Prisoner's dilemma
  • Tit-for-tat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. / Stevens, Jeffrey R.; Volstorf, Jenny; Schooler, Lael J.; Rieskamp, Jörg.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 1, No. JAN, Article 235, 01.12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stevens, Jeffrey R. ; Volstorf, Jenny ; Schooler, Lael J. ; Rieskamp, Jörg. / Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 1, No. JAN.
@article{84c87277a38c44248347fac4f9137701,
title = "Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies",
abstract = "Theoretical studies of cooperative behavior have focused on decision strategies that depend on a partner's last choices. The findings from this work assume that players accurately remember past actions. The kind of memory that these strategies employ, however, does not reflect what we know about memory. Here, we show that human memory may not meet the requirements needed to use these strategies. When asked to recall the previous behavior of simulated partners in a cooperative memory task, participants performed poorly, making errors in 10-24{\%} of the trials. Participants made more errors when required to track more partners. We conducted agent-based simulations to evaluate how well cooperative strategies cope with error. These simulations suggest that, even with few errors, cooperation could not be maintained at the error rates demonstrated by our participants. Our results indicate that the strategies typically used in the study of cooperation likely do not reflect the underlying cognitive capacities used by humans and other animals in social interactions. By including unrealistic assumptions about cognition, theoretical models may have overestimated the robustness of the existing cooperative strategies. To remedy this, future models should incorporate what we know about cognition.",
keywords = "Agent-based simulation, Cooperation, Decision strategy, Forgetting, Memory, Prisoner's dilemma, Tit-for-tat",
author = "Stevens, {Jeffrey R.} and Jenny Volstorf and Schooler, {Lael J.} and J{\"o}rg Rieskamp",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "JAN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies

AU - Stevens, Jeffrey R.

AU - Volstorf, Jenny

AU - Schooler, Lael J.

AU - Rieskamp, Jörg

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Theoretical studies of cooperative behavior have focused on decision strategies that depend on a partner's last choices. The findings from this work assume that players accurately remember past actions. The kind of memory that these strategies employ, however, does not reflect what we know about memory. Here, we show that human memory may not meet the requirements needed to use these strategies. When asked to recall the previous behavior of simulated partners in a cooperative memory task, participants performed poorly, making errors in 10-24% of the trials. Participants made more errors when required to track more partners. We conducted agent-based simulations to evaluate how well cooperative strategies cope with error. These simulations suggest that, even with few errors, cooperation could not be maintained at the error rates demonstrated by our participants. Our results indicate that the strategies typically used in the study of cooperation likely do not reflect the underlying cognitive capacities used by humans and other animals in social interactions. By including unrealistic assumptions about cognition, theoretical models may have overestimated the robustness of the existing cooperative strategies. To remedy this, future models should incorporate what we know about cognition.

AB - Theoretical studies of cooperative behavior have focused on decision strategies that depend on a partner's last choices. The findings from this work assume that players accurately remember past actions. The kind of memory that these strategies employ, however, does not reflect what we know about memory. Here, we show that human memory may not meet the requirements needed to use these strategies. When asked to recall the previous behavior of simulated partners in a cooperative memory task, participants performed poorly, making errors in 10-24% of the trials. Participants made more errors when required to track more partners. We conducted agent-based simulations to evaluate how well cooperative strategies cope with error. These simulations suggest that, even with few errors, cooperation could not be maintained at the error rates demonstrated by our participants. Our results indicate that the strategies typically used in the study of cooperation likely do not reflect the underlying cognitive capacities used by humans and other animals in social interactions. By including unrealistic assumptions about cognition, theoretical models may have overestimated the robustness of the existing cooperative strategies. To remedy this, future models should incorporate what we know about cognition.

KW - Agent-based simulation

KW - Cooperation

KW - Decision strategy

KW - Forgetting

KW - Memory

KW - Prisoner's dilemma

KW - Tit-for-tat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955740169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955740169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00235

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00235

M3 - Article

C2 - 21833289

AN - SCOPUS:79955740169

VL - 1

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - JAN

M1 - Article 235

ER -