Forb species establishment increases with decreased grass seeding density and with increased forb seeding density in a Northeast Kansas, U.S.A., experimental prairie restoration

Timothy L. Dickson, William H. Busby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most prairie restorations fail to produce the diversity of species found in unplowed remnants. This lack of restored diversity is hypothesized to be partly due to the inhibition of forb species by high seeding densities of dominant grasses and partly due to the low seeding densities of forbs used in many restorations. We tested this hypothesis by sowing various densities of forb and warm-season grass seeds into a restoration begun on bare soil. This is the first replicated restoration experiment we are aware of that varies grass seeding densities to examine the effects on forbs. Four years after seeding, we found that higher densities of grass seeds decreased forb cover, biomass, and richness, and higher densities of forb seeds increased forb richness. These results suggest that dominant grasses compete strongly with native forb species and that many forb species thrive when they are spatially separated from dominant grasses. The results also suggest that seed availability limits the establishment of some forbs. Forb diversity can therefore be increased by decreasing grass seeding density, by increasing forb seeding density, or both. However, forb seeds are generally expensive, and increasing forb seeding density across the entire area of a restoration may be prohibitively expensive. We therefore recommend a low seeding density of dominant grasses, and we recommend spatially separating forbs from dominant grasses by adding most forb seeds to areas with little to no dominant grasses and by adding the rest of the forb seeds to areas with a low density of dominant grasses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-605
Number of pages9
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

seeding
prairies
prairie
sowing
grass
grasses
seed
forbs
grass seed
seeds
restoration
warm season grasses
bare soil
native species
indigenous species
species diversity
biomass

Keywords

  • Conservation Reserve Program
  • Conservative forb species richness
  • Grassland
  • Optimal seed mix
  • Weedy species

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

@article{391752078ec44ac2bcb6f5f47981eba8,
title = "Forb species establishment increases with decreased grass seeding density and with increased forb seeding density in a Northeast Kansas, U.S.A., experimental prairie restoration",
abstract = "Most prairie restorations fail to produce the diversity of species found in unplowed remnants. This lack of restored diversity is hypothesized to be partly due to the inhibition of forb species by high seeding densities of dominant grasses and partly due to the low seeding densities of forbs used in many restorations. We tested this hypothesis by sowing various densities of forb and warm-season grass seeds into a restoration begun on bare soil. This is the first replicated restoration experiment we are aware of that varies grass seeding densities to examine the effects on forbs. Four years after seeding, we found that higher densities of grass seeds decreased forb cover, biomass, and richness, and higher densities of forb seeds increased forb richness. These results suggest that dominant grasses compete strongly with native forb species and that many forb species thrive when they are spatially separated from dominant grasses. The results also suggest that seed availability limits the establishment of some forbs. Forb diversity can therefore be increased by decreasing grass seeding density, by increasing forb seeding density, or both. However, forb seeds are generally expensive, and increasing forb seeding density across the entire area of a restoration may be prohibitively expensive. We therefore recommend a low seeding density of dominant grasses, and we recommend spatially separating forbs from dominant grasses by adding most forb seeds to areas with little to no dominant grasses and by adding the rest of the forb seeds to areas with a low density of dominant grasses.",
keywords = "Conservation Reserve Program, Conservative forb species richness, Grassland, Optimal seed mix, Weedy species",
author = "Dickson, {Timothy L.} and Busby, {William H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00427.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "597--605",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forb species establishment increases with decreased grass seeding density and with increased forb seeding density in a Northeast Kansas, U.S.A., experimental prairie restoration

AU - Dickson, Timothy L.

AU - Busby, William H.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Most prairie restorations fail to produce the diversity of species found in unplowed remnants. This lack of restored diversity is hypothesized to be partly due to the inhibition of forb species by high seeding densities of dominant grasses and partly due to the low seeding densities of forbs used in many restorations. We tested this hypothesis by sowing various densities of forb and warm-season grass seeds into a restoration begun on bare soil. This is the first replicated restoration experiment we are aware of that varies grass seeding densities to examine the effects on forbs. Four years after seeding, we found that higher densities of grass seeds decreased forb cover, biomass, and richness, and higher densities of forb seeds increased forb richness. These results suggest that dominant grasses compete strongly with native forb species and that many forb species thrive when they are spatially separated from dominant grasses. The results also suggest that seed availability limits the establishment of some forbs. Forb diversity can therefore be increased by decreasing grass seeding density, by increasing forb seeding density, or both. However, forb seeds are generally expensive, and increasing forb seeding density across the entire area of a restoration may be prohibitively expensive. We therefore recommend a low seeding density of dominant grasses, and we recommend spatially separating forbs from dominant grasses by adding most forb seeds to areas with little to no dominant grasses and by adding the rest of the forb seeds to areas with a low density of dominant grasses.

AB - Most prairie restorations fail to produce the diversity of species found in unplowed remnants. This lack of restored diversity is hypothesized to be partly due to the inhibition of forb species by high seeding densities of dominant grasses and partly due to the low seeding densities of forbs used in many restorations. We tested this hypothesis by sowing various densities of forb and warm-season grass seeds into a restoration begun on bare soil. This is the first replicated restoration experiment we are aware of that varies grass seeding densities to examine the effects on forbs. Four years after seeding, we found that higher densities of grass seeds decreased forb cover, biomass, and richness, and higher densities of forb seeds increased forb richness. These results suggest that dominant grasses compete strongly with native forb species and that many forb species thrive when they are spatially separated from dominant grasses. The results also suggest that seed availability limits the establishment of some forbs. Forb diversity can therefore be increased by decreasing grass seeding density, by increasing forb seeding density, or both. However, forb seeds are generally expensive, and increasing forb seeding density across the entire area of a restoration may be prohibitively expensive. We therefore recommend a low seeding density of dominant grasses, and we recommend spatially separating forbs from dominant grasses by adding most forb seeds to areas with little to no dominant grasses and by adding the rest of the forb seeds to areas with a low density of dominant grasses.

KW - Conservation Reserve Program

KW - Conservative forb species richness

KW - Grassland

KW - Optimal seed mix

KW - Weedy species

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349514999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349514999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00427.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00427.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349514999

VL - 17

SP - 597

EP - 605

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 5

ER -