Foot strike patterns after obstacle clearance during running

Shane D. Scholten, Nicholas Stergiou, Alan Hreljac, Jeremy Houser, Daniel Blanke, L. Russell Alberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Running over obstacles of sufficient height requires heel strike (HS) runners to make a transition in landing strategy to a forefoot (FF) strike, resulting in similar ground reaction force patterns to those observed while landing from a jump. Identification of the biomechanical variables that distinguish between the landing strategies may offer some insight into the reasons that the transition occurs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in foot strike patterns and kinetic parameters of heel strike runners between level running and running over obstacles of various heights. Methods: Ten heel strike subjects ran at their self-selected pace under seven different conditions: unperturbed running (no obstacle) and over obstacles of six different heights (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, and 22.5% of their standing height). The obstacle was placed directly before a Kistler force platform. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the subject means of selected kinetic parameters. Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.004) for all of the parameters analyzed. The evaluation of the center of pressure and the ground reaction forces indicated that the foot strike patterns were affected by the increased obstacle height. Between the 12.5% and 15% obstacle conditions, the group response changed from a heel strike to a forefoot strike pattern. Conclusions: At height > 15%, the pattern was more closely related to the foot strike patterns found in jumping activities. This strategy change may represent a gait transition effected as a mechanism to protect against increased impact forces. Greater involvement of the ankle and the calf muscles could have assisted in attenuating the increased impact forces while maintaining speed after clearing the obstacle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-129
Number of pages7
JournalMedicine and science in sports and exercise
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Heel
Foot
Gait
Ankle
Analysis of Variance
Muscles

Keywords

  • Gait transitions
  • Ground reaction forces
  • Locomotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Foot strike patterns after obstacle clearance during running. / Scholten, Shane D.; Stergiou, Nicholas; Hreljac, Alan; Houser, Jeremy; Blanke, Daniel; Alberts, L. Russell.

In: Medicine and science in sports and exercise, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 123-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scholten, Shane D. ; Stergiou, Nicholas ; Hreljac, Alan ; Houser, Jeremy ; Blanke, Daniel ; Alberts, L. Russell. / Foot strike patterns after obstacle clearance during running. In: Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2002 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 123-129.
@article{d406736b7cb54ae1bfa3c983160aae01,
title = "Foot strike patterns after obstacle clearance during running",
abstract = "Purpose: Running over obstacles of sufficient height requires heel strike (HS) runners to make a transition in landing strategy to a forefoot (FF) strike, resulting in similar ground reaction force patterns to those observed while landing from a jump. Identification of the biomechanical variables that distinguish between the landing strategies may offer some insight into the reasons that the transition occurs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in foot strike patterns and kinetic parameters of heel strike runners between level running and running over obstacles of various heights. Methods: Ten heel strike subjects ran at their self-selected pace under seven different conditions: unperturbed running (no obstacle) and over obstacles of six different heights (10{\%}, 12.5{\%}, 15{\%}, 17.5{\%}, 20{\%}, and 22.5{\%} of their standing height). The obstacle was placed directly before a Kistler force platform. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the subject means of selected kinetic parameters. Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.004) for all of the parameters analyzed. The evaluation of the center of pressure and the ground reaction forces indicated that the foot strike patterns were affected by the increased obstacle height. Between the 12.5{\%} and 15{\%} obstacle conditions, the group response changed from a heel strike to a forefoot strike pattern. Conclusions: At height > 15{\%}, the pattern was more closely related to the foot strike patterns found in jumping activities. This strategy change may represent a gait transition effected as a mechanism to protect against increased impact forces. Greater involvement of the ankle and the calf muscles could have assisted in attenuating the increased impact forces while maintaining speed after clearing the obstacle.",
keywords = "Gait transitions, Ground reaction forces, Locomotion",
author = "Scholten, {Shane D.} and Nicholas Stergiou and Alan Hreljac and Jeremy Houser and Daniel Blanke and Alberts, {L. Russell}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005768-200201000-00019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "123--129",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foot strike patterns after obstacle clearance during running

AU - Scholten, Shane D.

AU - Stergiou, Nicholas

AU - Hreljac, Alan

AU - Houser, Jeremy

AU - Blanke, Daniel

AU - Alberts, L. Russell

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Running over obstacles of sufficient height requires heel strike (HS) runners to make a transition in landing strategy to a forefoot (FF) strike, resulting in similar ground reaction force patterns to those observed while landing from a jump. Identification of the biomechanical variables that distinguish between the landing strategies may offer some insight into the reasons that the transition occurs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in foot strike patterns and kinetic parameters of heel strike runners between level running and running over obstacles of various heights. Methods: Ten heel strike subjects ran at their self-selected pace under seven different conditions: unperturbed running (no obstacle) and over obstacles of six different heights (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, and 22.5% of their standing height). The obstacle was placed directly before a Kistler force platform. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the subject means of selected kinetic parameters. Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.004) for all of the parameters analyzed. The evaluation of the center of pressure and the ground reaction forces indicated that the foot strike patterns were affected by the increased obstacle height. Between the 12.5% and 15% obstacle conditions, the group response changed from a heel strike to a forefoot strike pattern. Conclusions: At height > 15%, the pattern was more closely related to the foot strike patterns found in jumping activities. This strategy change may represent a gait transition effected as a mechanism to protect against increased impact forces. Greater involvement of the ankle and the calf muscles could have assisted in attenuating the increased impact forces while maintaining speed after clearing the obstacle.

AB - Purpose: Running over obstacles of sufficient height requires heel strike (HS) runners to make a transition in landing strategy to a forefoot (FF) strike, resulting in similar ground reaction force patterns to those observed while landing from a jump. Identification of the biomechanical variables that distinguish between the landing strategies may offer some insight into the reasons that the transition occurs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in foot strike patterns and kinetic parameters of heel strike runners between level running and running over obstacles of various heights. Methods: Ten heel strike subjects ran at their self-selected pace under seven different conditions: unperturbed running (no obstacle) and over obstacles of six different heights (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, and 22.5% of their standing height). The obstacle was placed directly before a Kistler force platform. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the subject means of selected kinetic parameters. Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.004) for all of the parameters analyzed. The evaluation of the center of pressure and the ground reaction forces indicated that the foot strike patterns were affected by the increased obstacle height. Between the 12.5% and 15% obstacle conditions, the group response changed from a heel strike to a forefoot strike pattern. Conclusions: At height > 15%, the pattern was more closely related to the foot strike patterns found in jumping activities. This strategy change may represent a gait transition effected as a mechanism to protect against increased impact forces. Greater involvement of the ankle and the calf muscles could have assisted in attenuating the increased impact forces while maintaining speed after clearing the obstacle.

KW - Gait transitions

KW - Ground reaction forces

KW - Locomotion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036144497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036144497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005768-200201000-00019

DO - 10.1097/00005768-200201000-00019

M3 - Article

C2 - 11782657

AN - SCOPUS:0036144497

VL - 34

SP - 123

EP - 129

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 1

ER -