Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels

the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold

Guoguang Niu, Etai Sapoznik, Peng Lu, Tracy Criswell, Aaron M Mohs, Ge Wang, Sang Jin Lee, Yong Xu, Shay Soker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fluorescent imaging is a useful tool to monitor and evaluate bioengineered tissues and organs. However, autofluorescence emitted from the scaffold can be comparable or even overwhelm signals generated by fluorescently labelled cells and biomarkers. Using standard fluorescent microscopy techniques, a simple and easy-to-measure signal to noise ratio metric was developed, which can facilitate the selection of fluorescent biomarkers and the respective biomaterials for tissue engineering studies. Endothelial cells (MS1) expressing green-fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein (mKate) were seeded on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)–collagen hybrid scaffolds that were prepared by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, genipin and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide. All scaffolds had comparable mechanical properties, which could meet the requirements for vascular graft applications. ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio value because of its low autofluorescence in green and red channels. Genipin crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio only in the green channel, while glutaraldehyde crosslinked scaffolds had a low signal to noise ratio in both green and red channels. The signal to noise ratio was independent of the exposure time. The data show that although similar in their mechanical properties and ability to support cell growth, scaffolds crosslinked with different agents have significant differences in causing autofluorescence of the scaffolds. This result indicates that scaffold's preparation method may have a significant impact on direct imaging of fluorescently labelled cells on scaffolds used for tissue engineering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)955-966
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Endothelial cells
Blood vessels
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Scaffolds
Crosslinking
Blood Vessels
Endothelial Cells
Imaging techniques
Signal to noise ratio
Carbodiimides
Scaffolds (biology)
Glutaral
Tissue Engineering
Biomarkers
Tissue engineering
Biocompatible Materials
Green Fluorescent Proteins
Proteins
Mechanical properties
Microscopy

Keywords

  • autofluorescence
  • blood vessel
  • endothelial cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels : the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold. / Niu, Guoguang; Sapoznik, Etai; Lu, Peng; Criswell, Tracy; Mohs, Aaron M; Wang, Ge; Lee, Sang Jin; Xu, Yong; Soker, Shay.

In: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 955-966.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niu, Guoguang ; Sapoznik, Etai ; Lu, Peng ; Criswell, Tracy ; Mohs, Aaron M ; Wang, Ge ; Lee, Sang Jin ; Xu, Yong ; Soker, Shay. / Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels : the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold. In: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 11. pp. 955-966.
@article{9c9528c63fd84988a807fa78449412c7,
title = "Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels: the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold",
abstract = "Fluorescent imaging is a useful tool to monitor and evaluate bioengineered tissues and organs. However, autofluorescence emitted from the scaffold can be comparable or even overwhelm signals generated by fluorescently labelled cells and biomarkers. Using standard fluorescent microscopy techniques, a simple and easy-to-measure signal to noise ratio metric was developed, which can facilitate the selection of fluorescent biomarkers and the respective biomaterials for tissue engineering studies. Endothelial cells (MS1) expressing green-fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein (mKate) were seeded on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)–collagen hybrid scaffolds that were prepared by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, genipin and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide. All scaffolds had comparable mechanical properties, which could meet the requirements for vascular graft applications. ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio value because of its low autofluorescence in green and red channels. Genipin crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio only in the green channel, while glutaraldehyde crosslinked scaffolds had a low signal to noise ratio in both green and red channels. The signal to noise ratio was independent of the exposure time. The data show that although similar in their mechanical properties and ability to support cell growth, scaffolds crosslinked with different agents have significant differences in causing autofluorescence of the scaffolds. This result indicates that scaffold's preparation method may have a significant impact on direct imaging of fluorescently labelled cells on scaffolds used for tissue engineering.",
keywords = "autofluorescence, blood vessel, endothelial cells",
author = "Guoguang Niu and Etai Sapoznik and Peng Lu and Tracy Criswell and Mohs, {Aaron M} and Ge Wang and Lee, {Sang Jin} and Yong Xu and Shay Soker",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/term.1876",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "955--966",
journal = "Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine",
issn = "1932-6254",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels

T2 - the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold

AU - Niu, Guoguang

AU - Sapoznik, Etai

AU - Lu, Peng

AU - Criswell, Tracy

AU - Mohs, Aaron M

AU - Wang, Ge

AU - Lee, Sang Jin

AU - Xu, Yong

AU - Soker, Shay

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Fluorescent imaging is a useful tool to monitor and evaluate bioengineered tissues and organs. However, autofluorescence emitted from the scaffold can be comparable or even overwhelm signals generated by fluorescently labelled cells and biomarkers. Using standard fluorescent microscopy techniques, a simple and easy-to-measure signal to noise ratio metric was developed, which can facilitate the selection of fluorescent biomarkers and the respective biomaterials for tissue engineering studies. Endothelial cells (MS1) expressing green-fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein (mKate) were seeded on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)–collagen hybrid scaffolds that were prepared by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, genipin and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide. All scaffolds had comparable mechanical properties, which could meet the requirements for vascular graft applications. ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio value because of its low autofluorescence in green and red channels. Genipin crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio only in the green channel, while glutaraldehyde crosslinked scaffolds had a low signal to noise ratio in both green and red channels. The signal to noise ratio was independent of the exposure time. The data show that although similar in their mechanical properties and ability to support cell growth, scaffolds crosslinked with different agents have significant differences in causing autofluorescence of the scaffolds. This result indicates that scaffold's preparation method may have a significant impact on direct imaging of fluorescently labelled cells on scaffolds used for tissue engineering.

AB - Fluorescent imaging is a useful tool to monitor and evaluate bioengineered tissues and organs. However, autofluorescence emitted from the scaffold can be comparable or even overwhelm signals generated by fluorescently labelled cells and biomarkers. Using standard fluorescent microscopy techniques, a simple and easy-to-measure signal to noise ratio metric was developed, which can facilitate the selection of fluorescent biomarkers and the respective biomaterials for tissue engineering studies. Endothelial cells (MS1) expressing green-fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein (mKate) were seeded on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)–collagen hybrid scaffolds that were prepared by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, genipin and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide. All scaffolds had comparable mechanical properties, which could meet the requirements for vascular graft applications. ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio value because of its low autofluorescence in green and red channels. Genipin crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio only in the green channel, while glutaraldehyde crosslinked scaffolds had a low signal to noise ratio in both green and red channels. The signal to noise ratio was independent of the exposure time. The data show that although similar in their mechanical properties and ability to support cell growth, scaffolds crosslinked with different agents have significant differences in causing autofluorescence of the scaffolds. This result indicates that scaffold's preparation method may have a significant impact on direct imaging of fluorescently labelled cells on scaffolds used for tissue engineering.

KW - autofluorescence

KW - blood vessel

KW - endothelial cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894451290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894451290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/term.1876

DO - 10.1002/term.1876

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 955

EP - 966

JO - Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

JF - Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SN - 1932-6254

IS - 11

ER -