Flexibility training

Ballistic, static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation?

S. P. Sady, M. Wortman, Daniel Blanke

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    176 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The effects of stretching techniques on the flexibility of the shoulder, trunk and hamstring muscles were compared in college men. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: control (n = 10), ballistic (n = 11), static (n = 10), or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) (n = 12). Baseline measurements (Leighton flexometer) were obtained on 2 separate days prior to and following a 3-day per week, 6-week flexibility training program. A 4x3 (subject group x muscle group) unweighted mean factorial analysis of variance for the difference scores (post minue pre) revealed significant (p<0.05) main effects for the 4 subject groups and the 3 muscle groups. Post hoc analysis showed that only the PNF group had flexibility increases (10.6 degrees) greater than the control (3.4 degrees), and that the hamstrings (9.4 degree increase) improved more than the trunk (5.2 degree increase). Furthermore, reliability was generally higher for the post-training scores, and the variability between days was lower for the post-training scores of the shoulder and hamstrings (p<0.05). The significant (p<0.05) between-day changes in flexibility pre-training confirm the importance of establishing baseline data prior to any training study. The findings indicate that PNF may be the preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)261-263
    Number of pages3
    JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Volume63
    Issue number6
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

    Fingerprint

    Muscles
    Analysis of Variance
    Education
    Control Groups
    Hamstring Muscles

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Rehabilitation

    Cite this

    Flexibility training : Ballistic, static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation? / Sady, S. P.; Wortman, M.; Blanke, Daniel.

    In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 63, No. 6, 01.01.1982, p. 261-263.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{12c8e6e52a474b6187556d8a8d634f39,
    title = "Flexibility training: Ballistic, static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation?",
    abstract = "The effects of stretching techniques on the flexibility of the shoulder, trunk and hamstring muscles were compared in college men. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: control (n = 10), ballistic (n = 11), static (n = 10), or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) (n = 12). Baseline measurements (Leighton flexometer) were obtained on 2 separate days prior to and following a 3-day per week, 6-week flexibility training program. A 4x3 (subject group x muscle group) unweighted mean factorial analysis of variance for the difference scores (post minue pre) revealed significant (p<0.05) main effects for the 4 subject groups and the 3 muscle groups. Post hoc analysis showed that only the PNF group had flexibility increases (10.6 degrees) greater than the control (3.4 degrees), and that the hamstrings (9.4 degree increase) improved more than the trunk (5.2 degree increase). Furthermore, reliability was generally higher for the post-training scores, and the variability between days was lower for the post-training scores of the shoulder and hamstrings (p<0.05). The significant (p<0.05) between-day changes in flexibility pre-training confirm the importance of establishing baseline data prior to any training study. The findings indicate that PNF may be the preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores.",
    author = "Sady, {S. P.} and M. Wortman and Daniel Blanke",
    year = "1982",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "261--263",
    journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
    issn = "0003-9993",
    publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Flexibility training

    T2 - Ballistic, static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation?

    AU - Sady, S. P.

    AU - Wortman, M.

    AU - Blanke, Daniel

    PY - 1982/1/1

    Y1 - 1982/1/1

    N2 - The effects of stretching techniques on the flexibility of the shoulder, trunk and hamstring muscles were compared in college men. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: control (n = 10), ballistic (n = 11), static (n = 10), or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) (n = 12). Baseline measurements (Leighton flexometer) were obtained on 2 separate days prior to and following a 3-day per week, 6-week flexibility training program. A 4x3 (subject group x muscle group) unweighted mean factorial analysis of variance for the difference scores (post minue pre) revealed significant (p<0.05) main effects for the 4 subject groups and the 3 muscle groups. Post hoc analysis showed that only the PNF group had flexibility increases (10.6 degrees) greater than the control (3.4 degrees), and that the hamstrings (9.4 degree increase) improved more than the trunk (5.2 degree increase). Furthermore, reliability was generally higher for the post-training scores, and the variability between days was lower for the post-training scores of the shoulder and hamstrings (p<0.05). The significant (p<0.05) between-day changes in flexibility pre-training confirm the importance of establishing baseline data prior to any training study. The findings indicate that PNF may be the preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores.

    AB - The effects of stretching techniques on the flexibility of the shoulder, trunk and hamstring muscles were compared in college men. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: control (n = 10), ballistic (n = 11), static (n = 10), or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) (n = 12). Baseline measurements (Leighton flexometer) were obtained on 2 separate days prior to and following a 3-day per week, 6-week flexibility training program. A 4x3 (subject group x muscle group) unweighted mean factorial analysis of variance for the difference scores (post minue pre) revealed significant (p<0.05) main effects for the 4 subject groups and the 3 muscle groups. Post hoc analysis showed that only the PNF group had flexibility increases (10.6 degrees) greater than the control (3.4 degrees), and that the hamstrings (9.4 degree increase) improved more than the trunk (5.2 degree increase). Furthermore, reliability was generally higher for the post-training scores, and the variability between days was lower for the post-training scores of the shoulder and hamstrings (p<0.05). The significant (p<0.05) between-day changes in flexibility pre-training confirm the importance of establishing baseline data prior to any training study. The findings indicate that PNF may be the preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019963701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019963701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 63

    SP - 261

    EP - 263

    JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    SN - 0003-9993

    IS - 6

    ER -