First and ten leadership

A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model

Samuel T. Hunter, Liliya Cushenbery, Christian Thoroughgood, Johanna E. Johnson, Ginamarie S Ligon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emerging from the early work of Weber (1924), the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership (Mumford, 2006) has enjoyed a recent surge in research attention. According to the model, the three leader types differ in a number of fundamental ways - differences largely tied to how the leaders provide sensemaking to followers. Although these differences are central to the model, these components have yet to be examined directly. As such, the aim of this study was to explicitly test the core tenants of the CIP model. Using a historiometric sample of college and NFL football coaches we found general support for specific predictions made by the model and in the aggregate, the model as a whole. We also examined the unique patterns and features that were used to distinguish among the leader types providing useful insight into how leaders may be categorized. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-91
Number of pages22
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Football
pragmatics
leadership
Research
leader
follower
coach
Direction compound
Mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

First and ten leadership : A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model. / Hunter, Samuel T.; Cushenbery, Liliya; Thoroughgood, Christian; Johnson, Johanna E.; Ligon, Ginamarie S.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 70-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, Samuel T. ; Cushenbery, Liliya ; Thoroughgood, Christian ; Johnson, Johanna E. ; Ligon, Ginamarie S. / First and ten leadership : A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model. In: Leadership Quarterly. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 70-91.
@article{c34bf4d5c6aa4a6495e195cd0cda3c79,
title = "First and ten leadership: A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model",
abstract = "Emerging from the early work of Weber (1924), the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership (Mumford, 2006) has enjoyed a recent surge in research attention. According to the model, the three leader types differ in a number of fundamental ways - differences largely tied to how the leaders provide sensemaking to followers. Although these differences are central to the model, these components have yet to be examined directly. As such, the aim of this study was to explicitly test the core tenants of the CIP model. Using a historiometric sample of college and NFL football coaches we found general support for specific predictions made by the model and in the aggregate, the model as a whole. We also examined the unique patterns and features that were used to distinguish among the leader types providing useful insight into how leaders may be categorized. Implications and future directions are discussed.",
author = "Hunter, {Samuel T.} and Liliya Cushenbery and Christian Thoroughgood and Johnson, {Johanna E.} and Ligon, {Ginamarie S}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "70--91",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First and ten leadership

T2 - A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model

AU - Hunter, Samuel T.

AU - Cushenbery, Liliya

AU - Thoroughgood, Christian

AU - Johnson, Johanna E.

AU - Ligon, Ginamarie S

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Emerging from the early work of Weber (1924), the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership (Mumford, 2006) has enjoyed a recent surge in research attention. According to the model, the three leader types differ in a number of fundamental ways - differences largely tied to how the leaders provide sensemaking to followers. Although these differences are central to the model, these components have yet to be examined directly. As such, the aim of this study was to explicitly test the core tenants of the CIP model. Using a historiometric sample of college and NFL football coaches we found general support for specific predictions made by the model and in the aggregate, the model as a whole. We also examined the unique patterns and features that were used to distinguish among the leader types providing useful insight into how leaders may be categorized. Implications and future directions are discussed.

AB - Emerging from the early work of Weber (1924), the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership (Mumford, 2006) has enjoyed a recent surge in research attention. According to the model, the three leader types differ in a number of fundamental ways - differences largely tied to how the leaders provide sensemaking to followers. Although these differences are central to the model, these components have yet to be examined directly. As such, the aim of this study was to explicitly test the core tenants of the CIP model. Using a historiometric sample of college and NFL football coaches we found general support for specific predictions made by the model and in the aggregate, the model as a whole. We also examined the unique patterns and features that were used to distinguish among the leader types providing useful insight into how leaders may be categorized. Implications and future directions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951724237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951724237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 70

EP - 91

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 1

ER -