Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test

Carl V. Smith, Jeffrey P. Phelan, Lawrence D. Platt, Paula Broussard, Richard H. Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

117 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50% reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14% in the control group and 9% in the study group (K2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-134
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume155
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1986

Fingerprint

Acoustic Stimulation
Artificial Larynges
Activity Cycles
High-Risk Pregnancy
Fetal Movement
Fetal Heart Rate
Incidence
Randomized Controlled Trials
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Antepartum fetal heart rate testing
  • fetal acoustic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. / Smith, Carl V.; Phelan, Jeffrey P.; Platt, Lawrence D.; Broussard, Paula; Paul, Richard H.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 155, No. 1, 07.1986, p. 131-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Carl V. ; Phelan, Jeffrey P. ; Platt, Lawrence D. ; Broussard, Paula ; Paul, Richard H. / Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1986 ; Vol. 155, No. 1. pp. 131-134.
@article{808d5a476070421db5e48dfbefe406af,
title = "Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test",
abstract = "Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50{\%} reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14{\%} in the control group and 9{\%} in the study group (K2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.",
keywords = "Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, fetal acoustic stimulation",
author = "Smith, {Carl V.} and Phelan, {Jeffrey P.} and Platt, {Lawrence D.} and Paula Broussard and Paul, {Richard H.}",
year = "1986",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9378(86)90095-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "131--134",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test

AU - Smith, Carl V.

AU - Phelan, Jeffrey P.

AU - Platt, Lawrence D.

AU - Broussard, Paula

AU - Paul, Richard H.

PY - 1986/7

Y1 - 1986/7

N2 - Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50% reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14% in the control group and 9% in the study group (K2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.

AB - Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50% reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14% in the control group and 9% in the study group (K2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.

KW - Antepartum fetal heart rate testing

KW - fetal acoustic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022592374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022592374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90095-5

DO - 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90095-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 3524234

AN - SCOPUS:0022592374

VL - 155

SP - 131

EP - 134

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -