Fertility and Infertility: Toward an Integrative Research Agenda

Katherine M. Johnson, Arthur L. Greil, Karina M. Shreffler, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we show that social science research on fertility and infertility consists of largely separate research traditions, despite shared interest in pregnancies and births (or lack thereof). We describe four ways these two traditions differ: (1) publication trajectories and outlets, (2) fields of study and major theoretical frameworks, (3) degree of attention to the other topic, and (4) language and definitions used. We then discuss why future integration of these bodies of research would be beneficial, outline potential steps toward rapprochement, and provide common areas of dialogue that could facilitate and enrich these bodies of research. We offer a more holistic framework using the reproductive career as an extension of existing lifecourse approaches in both fertility and infertility research. We conclude with a brief empirical example and discussion of methodological issues for measuring and modeling reproductive careers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-666
Number of pages26
JournalPopulation Research and Policy Review
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

infertility
fertility
career
field of study
pregnancy
social science
trajectory
dialogue
lack
language
modeling

Keywords

  • Fertility
  • Infertility
  • Lifecourse
  • Reproduction
  • Reproductive career

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Fertility and Infertility : Toward an Integrative Research Agenda. / Johnson, Katherine M.; Greil, Arthur L.; Shreffler, Karina M.; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Population Research and Policy Review, Vol. 37, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 641-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, Katherine M. ; Greil, Arthur L. ; Shreffler, Karina M. ; McQuillan, Julia. / Fertility and Infertility : Toward an Integrative Research Agenda. In: Population Research and Policy Review. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 5. pp. 641-666.
@article{ddeafdadc66f4734a5eae68630369650,
title = "Fertility and Infertility: Toward an Integrative Research Agenda",
abstract = "In this article, we show that social science research on fertility and infertility consists of largely separate research traditions, despite shared interest in pregnancies and births (or lack thereof). We describe four ways these two traditions differ: (1) publication trajectories and outlets, (2) fields of study and major theoretical frameworks, (3) degree of attention to the other topic, and (4) language and definitions used. We then discuss why future integration of these bodies of research would be beneficial, outline potential steps toward rapprochement, and provide common areas of dialogue that could facilitate and enrich these bodies of research. We offer a more holistic framework using the reproductive career as an extension of existing lifecourse approaches in both fertility and infertility research. We conclude with a brief empirical example and discussion of methodological issues for measuring and modeling reproductive careers.",
keywords = "Fertility, Infertility, Lifecourse, Reproduction, Reproductive career",
author = "Johnson, {Katherine M.} and Greil, {Arthur L.} and Shreffler, {Karina M.} and Julia McQuillan",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11113-018-9476-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "641--666",
journal = "Population Research and Policy Review",
issn = "0167-5923",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fertility and Infertility

T2 - Toward an Integrative Research Agenda

AU - Johnson, Katherine M.

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - Shreffler, Karina M.

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - In this article, we show that social science research on fertility and infertility consists of largely separate research traditions, despite shared interest in pregnancies and births (or lack thereof). We describe four ways these two traditions differ: (1) publication trajectories and outlets, (2) fields of study and major theoretical frameworks, (3) degree of attention to the other topic, and (4) language and definitions used. We then discuss why future integration of these bodies of research would be beneficial, outline potential steps toward rapprochement, and provide common areas of dialogue that could facilitate and enrich these bodies of research. We offer a more holistic framework using the reproductive career as an extension of existing lifecourse approaches in both fertility and infertility research. We conclude with a brief empirical example and discussion of methodological issues for measuring and modeling reproductive careers.

AB - In this article, we show that social science research on fertility and infertility consists of largely separate research traditions, despite shared interest in pregnancies and births (or lack thereof). We describe four ways these two traditions differ: (1) publication trajectories and outlets, (2) fields of study and major theoretical frameworks, (3) degree of attention to the other topic, and (4) language and definitions used. We then discuss why future integration of these bodies of research would be beneficial, outline potential steps toward rapprochement, and provide common areas of dialogue that could facilitate and enrich these bodies of research. We offer a more holistic framework using the reproductive career as an extension of existing lifecourse approaches in both fertility and infertility research. We conclude with a brief empirical example and discussion of methodological issues for measuring and modeling reproductive careers.

KW - Fertility

KW - Infertility

KW - Lifecourse

KW - Reproduction

KW - Reproductive career

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049583198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049583198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11113-018-9476-2

DO - 10.1007/s11113-018-9476-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049583198

VL - 37

SP - 641

EP - 666

JO - Population Research and Policy Review

JF - Population Research and Policy Review

SN - 0167-5923

IS - 5

ER -