Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program

Aaron Kline, Kerry Leedom-Larson, Kelley Donham, Risto Rautiainen, Sara Schneiders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article summarizes the qualitative findings from a study evaluating a novel agricultural health and safety program called Certified Safe Farm (CSF). Results are presented from focus groups held in 2002 and 2006 as well as mail-out surveys conducted in 2001 and 2002. Focus group participants and survey responders were farmers involved in CSF intervention studies. CSF aims to remove hazards through on-farm safety reviews, detect health concerns through clinical screenings, provide personalized occupational health and wellness education, and provide incentives for meeting farm safety targets. Farmers overwhelmingly felt that CSF was beneficial for their health and safety by improving their knowledge and behaviors. In both the focus groups and questionnaires, farmers felt that occupational health screening was the most important component of CSF, and on-farm safety review was the second most important component. Farmers also helped to identify areas in which CSF could be improved in the future. Major areas of suggested program improvement included increased involvement of entire farm families, increased enrollment of younger farmers, increased program incentives such as reduced insurance premiums, and increased ease of access to program providers (AgriSafe clinics), among other recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-43
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Agromedicine
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Safety
Focus Groups
Occupational Health
Motivation
Health
Farms
Farmers
Postal Service
Insurance
Health Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Intervention studies
  • Occupational health
  • Occupational safety
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program. / Kline, Aaron; Leedom-Larson, Kerry; Donham, Kelley; Rautiainen, Risto; Schneiders, Sara.

In: Journal of Agromedicine, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.12.2007, p. 33-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kline, A, Leedom-Larson, K, Donham, K, Rautiainen, R & Schneiders, S 2007, 'Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program', Journal of Agromedicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599240801887827
Kline, Aaron ; Leedom-Larson, Kerry ; Donham, Kelley ; Rautiainen, Risto ; Schneiders, Sara. / Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program. In: Journal of Agromedicine. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 33-43.
@article{59a4e957ad5b424c9b8ce1b0ec7e80a9,
title = "Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program",
abstract = "This article summarizes the qualitative findings from a study evaluating a novel agricultural health and safety program called Certified Safe Farm (CSF). Results are presented from focus groups held in 2002 and 2006 as well as mail-out surveys conducted in 2001 and 2002. Focus group participants and survey responders were farmers involved in CSF intervention studies. CSF aims to remove hazards through on-farm safety reviews, detect health concerns through clinical screenings, provide personalized occupational health and wellness education, and provide incentives for meeting farm safety targets. Farmers overwhelmingly felt that CSF was beneficial for their health and safety by improving their knowledge and behaviors. In both the focus groups and questionnaires, farmers felt that occupational health screening was the most important component of CSF, and on-farm safety review was the second most important component. Farmers also helped to identify areas in which CSF could be improved in the future. Major areas of suggested program improvement included increased involvement of entire farm families, increased enrollment of younger farmers, increased program incentives such as reduced insurance premiums, and increased ease of access to program providers (AgriSafe clinics), among other recommendations.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Intervention studies, Occupational health, Occupational safety, Qualitative research",
author = "Aaron Kline and Kerry Leedom-Larson and Kelley Donham and Risto Rautiainen and Sara Schneiders",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10599240801887827",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "33--43",
journal = "Journal of Agromedicine",
issn = "1059-924X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program

AU - Kline, Aaron

AU - Leedom-Larson, Kerry

AU - Donham, Kelley

AU - Rautiainen, Risto

AU - Schneiders, Sara

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - This article summarizes the qualitative findings from a study evaluating a novel agricultural health and safety program called Certified Safe Farm (CSF). Results are presented from focus groups held in 2002 and 2006 as well as mail-out surveys conducted in 2001 and 2002. Focus group participants and survey responders were farmers involved in CSF intervention studies. CSF aims to remove hazards through on-farm safety reviews, detect health concerns through clinical screenings, provide personalized occupational health and wellness education, and provide incentives for meeting farm safety targets. Farmers overwhelmingly felt that CSF was beneficial for their health and safety by improving their knowledge and behaviors. In both the focus groups and questionnaires, farmers felt that occupational health screening was the most important component of CSF, and on-farm safety review was the second most important component. Farmers also helped to identify areas in which CSF could be improved in the future. Major areas of suggested program improvement included increased involvement of entire farm families, increased enrollment of younger farmers, increased program incentives such as reduced insurance premiums, and increased ease of access to program providers (AgriSafe clinics), among other recommendations.

AB - This article summarizes the qualitative findings from a study evaluating a novel agricultural health and safety program called Certified Safe Farm (CSF). Results are presented from focus groups held in 2002 and 2006 as well as mail-out surveys conducted in 2001 and 2002. Focus group participants and survey responders were farmers involved in CSF intervention studies. CSF aims to remove hazards through on-farm safety reviews, detect health concerns through clinical screenings, provide personalized occupational health and wellness education, and provide incentives for meeting farm safety targets. Farmers overwhelmingly felt that CSF was beneficial for their health and safety by improving their knowledge and behaviors. In both the focus groups and questionnaires, farmers felt that occupational health screening was the most important component of CSF, and on-farm safety review was the second most important component. Farmers also helped to identify areas in which CSF could be improved in the future. Major areas of suggested program improvement included increased involvement of entire farm families, increased enrollment of younger farmers, increased program incentives such as reduced insurance premiums, and increased ease of access to program providers (AgriSafe clinics), among other recommendations.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Intervention studies

KW - Occupational health

KW - Occupational safety

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149291892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149291892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10599240801887827

DO - 10.1080/10599240801887827

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 33

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Agromedicine

JF - Journal of Agromedicine

SN - 1059-924X

IS - 3

ER -