Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests: evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether interpolated recall or recognition tests will enhance the impairing influence of postevent misinformation on a final modified recognition test of original event information was examined in two experiments. Both used short retention intervals. Postevent information led to differences between control and misled conditions on interpolated tests, but no differences were found on modified tests. Arguments are presented that discredit the blocking hypothesis as a potential mechanism responsible for impairment found with postevent misinformation experiments that use short retention intervals. Instead, various rejection mechanisms are favorably assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-427
Number of pages21
JournalThe American journal of psychology
Volume106
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Communication
Recognition (Psychology)
Retention (Psychology)
Impairment
Rejection (Psychology)
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{1860f0493eec40698f1b0ec5f0da4d0a,
title = "Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests: evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis.",
abstract = "Whether interpolated recall or recognition tests will enhance the impairing influence of postevent misinformation on a final modified recognition test of original event information was examined in two experiments. Both used short retention intervals. Postevent information led to differences between control and misled conditions on interpolated tests, but no differences were found on modified tests. Arguments are presented that discredit the blocking hypothesis as a potential mechanism responsible for impairment found with postevent misinformation experiments that use short retention intervals. Instead, various rejection mechanisms are favorably assessed.",
author = "Belli, {R. F.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/1423184",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "407--427",
journal = "American Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0002-9556",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests

T2 - evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis.

AU - Belli, R. F.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Whether interpolated recall or recognition tests will enhance the impairing influence of postevent misinformation on a final modified recognition test of original event information was examined in two experiments. Both used short retention intervals. Postevent information led to differences between control and misled conditions on interpolated tests, but no differences were found on modified tests. Arguments are presented that discredit the blocking hypothesis as a potential mechanism responsible for impairment found with postevent misinformation experiments that use short retention intervals. Instead, various rejection mechanisms are favorably assessed.

AB - Whether interpolated recall or recognition tests will enhance the impairing influence of postevent misinformation on a final modified recognition test of original event information was examined in two experiments. Both used short retention intervals. Postevent information led to differences between control and misled conditions on interpolated tests, but no differences were found on modified tests. Arguments are presented that discredit the blocking hypothesis as a potential mechanism responsible for impairment found with postevent misinformation experiments that use short retention intervals. Instead, various rejection mechanisms are favorably assessed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027669410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027669410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1423184

DO - 10.2307/1423184

M3 - Article

C2 - 8238667

AN - SCOPUS:0027669410

VL - 106

SP - 407

EP - 427

JO - American Journal of Psychology

JF - American Journal of Psychology

SN - 0002-9556

IS - 3

ER -