Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs

Tom G. Gound, Linda DuBois, Stephen G. Biggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate method of taking radiographs during endodontic treatment to minimize the number of retakes. To accomplish this, the rate of retakes in an endodontic clinic at a dental school was measured. Then the effect that two factors, anatomic location and type of film holder, had on this rate were calculated and analyzed. Criteria for acceptability were that radiographs have adequate coverage and minimal distortion. Two endodontists evaluated endodontic treatment radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students to determine if these criteria were met. Of 402 films evaluated 77% were considered to be acceptable. A significantly higher rate of acceptability occurred with films taken in the mandible compared with those taken in the maxilla. The EndoRay (Rinn Corp., Elgin, Ill.) and hemostat were the only types of film holders compared. Films taken with the EndoRay in the maxilla had a significantly higher acceptability rate than those taken in the maxilla with a hemostat. No difference in acceptability existed between the two film holders when radiographs were taken in the mandible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)514-518
Number of pages5
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology
Volume77
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1994

Fingerprint

Endodontics
Maxilla
Mandible
Dental Students
Dental Schools
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs. / Gound, Tom G.; DuBois, Linda; Biggs, Stephen G.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Vol. 77, No. 5, 05.1994, p. 514-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gound, Tom G. ; DuBois, Linda ; Biggs, Stephen G. / Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs. In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1994 ; Vol. 77, No. 5. pp. 514-518.
@article{592a28efb0b24212800f8c72b089bc8b,
title = "Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate method of taking radiographs during endodontic treatment to minimize the number of retakes. To accomplish this, the rate of retakes in an endodontic clinic at a dental school was measured. Then the effect that two factors, anatomic location and type of film holder, had on this rate were calculated and analyzed. Criteria for acceptability were that radiographs have adequate coverage and minimal distortion. Two endodontists evaluated endodontic treatment radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students to determine if these criteria were met. Of 402 films evaluated 77{\%} were considered to be acceptable. A significantly higher rate of acceptability occurred with films taken in the mandible compared with those taken in the maxilla. The EndoRay (Rinn Corp., Elgin, Ill.) and hemostat were the only types of film holders compared. Films taken with the EndoRay in the maxilla had a significantly higher acceptability rate than those taken in the maxilla with a hemostat. No difference in acceptability existed between the two film holders when radiographs were taken in the mandible.",
author = "Gound, {Tom G.} and Linda DuBois and Biggs, {Stephen G.}",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/0030-4220(94)90234-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "514--518",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs

AU - Gound, Tom G.

AU - DuBois, Linda

AU - Biggs, Stephen G.

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate method of taking radiographs during endodontic treatment to minimize the number of retakes. To accomplish this, the rate of retakes in an endodontic clinic at a dental school was measured. Then the effect that two factors, anatomic location and type of film holder, had on this rate were calculated and analyzed. Criteria for acceptability were that radiographs have adequate coverage and minimal distortion. Two endodontists evaluated endodontic treatment radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students to determine if these criteria were met. Of 402 films evaluated 77% were considered to be acceptable. A significantly higher rate of acceptability occurred with films taken in the mandible compared with those taken in the maxilla. The EndoRay (Rinn Corp., Elgin, Ill.) and hemostat were the only types of film holders compared. Films taken with the EndoRay in the maxilla had a significantly higher acceptability rate than those taken in the maxilla with a hemostat. No difference in acceptability existed between the two film holders when radiographs were taken in the mandible.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate method of taking radiographs during endodontic treatment to minimize the number of retakes. To accomplish this, the rate of retakes in an endodontic clinic at a dental school was measured. Then the effect that two factors, anatomic location and type of film holder, had on this rate were calculated and analyzed. Criteria for acceptability were that radiographs have adequate coverage and minimal distortion. Two endodontists evaluated endodontic treatment radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students to determine if these criteria were met. Of 402 films evaluated 77% were considered to be acceptable. A significantly higher rate of acceptability occurred with films taken in the mandible compared with those taken in the maxilla. The EndoRay (Rinn Corp., Elgin, Ill.) and hemostat were the only types of film holders compared. Films taken with the EndoRay in the maxilla had a significantly higher acceptability rate than those taken in the maxilla with a hemostat. No difference in acceptability existed between the two film holders when radiographs were taken in the mandible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028435389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028435389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90234-8

DO - 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90234-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 8028875

AN - SCOPUS:0028435389

VL - 77

SP - 514

EP - 518

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 5

ER -