Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing

Lenore Holte, Elizabeth Walker, Jacob Oleson, Meredith Spratford, Mary Pat Moeller, Patricia Roush, Hua Ou, J. Bruce Tomblin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To document the epidemiological characteristics of a group of children who are hard of hearing, identify individual predictor variables for timely follow-up after a failed newborn hearing screening, and identify barriers to follow-up encountered by families. Method: The authors used an accelerated longitudinal design to investigate outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in a large, multicenter study. The present study involved a subgroup of 193 children with hearing loss who did not pass the newborn hearing screening. The authors used available records to capture ages of confirmation of hearing loss, hearing aid fitting, and entry into early intervention. Linear regression models were used to investigate relationships among individual predictor variables and age at each follow-up benchmark. Results: Of several predictor variables, only higher levels of maternal education were significantly associated with earlier confirmation of hearing loss and fitting of hearing aids; severity of hearing loss was not. No variables were significantly associated with age of entry into early intervention. Each recommended benchmark was met by a majority of children, but only one third met all of the benchmarks within the recommended time frame. Conclusion: Results suggest that underserved communities need extra support in navigating steps that follow failed newborn hearing screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-174
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican journal of audiology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 28 2012

Fingerprint

Neonatal Screening
Hearing
Hearing Loss
Benchmarking
Hearing Aids
Newborn Infant
Linear Models
Multicenter Studies
Mothers
Education

Keywords

  • Hearing loss
  • Infants
  • Screening
  • Universal newborn hearing screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing. / Holte, Lenore; Walker, Elizabeth; Oleson, Jacob; Spratford, Meredith; Moeller, Mary Pat; Roush, Patricia; Ou, Hua; Tomblin, J. Bruce.

In: American journal of audiology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 28.12.2012, p. 163-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holte, Lenore ; Walker, Elizabeth ; Oleson, Jacob ; Spratford, Meredith ; Moeller, Mary Pat ; Roush, Patricia ; Ou, Hua ; Tomblin, J. Bruce. / Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing. In: American journal of audiology. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 163-174.
@article{d124892414ee4d8ba655b92c936f9485,
title = "Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing",
abstract = "Purpose: To document the epidemiological characteristics of a group of children who are hard of hearing, identify individual predictor variables for timely follow-up after a failed newborn hearing screening, and identify barriers to follow-up encountered by families. Method: The authors used an accelerated longitudinal design to investigate outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in a large, multicenter study. The present study involved a subgroup of 193 children with hearing loss who did not pass the newborn hearing screening. The authors used available records to capture ages of confirmation of hearing loss, hearing aid fitting, and entry into early intervention. Linear regression models were used to investigate relationships among individual predictor variables and age at each follow-up benchmark. Results: Of several predictor variables, only higher levels of maternal education were significantly associated with earlier confirmation of hearing loss and fitting of hearing aids; severity of hearing loss was not. No variables were significantly associated with age of entry into early intervention. Each recommended benchmark was met by a majority of children, but only one third met all of the benchmarks within the recommended time frame. Conclusion: Results suggest that underserved communities need extra support in navigating steps that follow failed newborn hearing screening.",
keywords = "Hearing loss, Infants, Screening, Universal newborn hearing screening",
author = "Lenore Holte and Elizabeth Walker and Jacob Oleson and Meredith Spratford and Moeller, {Mary Pat} and Patricia Roush and Hua Ou and Tomblin, {J. Bruce}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0016)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "163--174",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing

AU - Holte, Lenore

AU - Walker, Elizabeth

AU - Oleson, Jacob

AU - Spratford, Meredith

AU - Moeller, Mary Pat

AU - Roush, Patricia

AU - Ou, Hua

AU - Tomblin, J. Bruce

PY - 2012/12/28

Y1 - 2012/12/28

N2 - Purpose: To document the epidemiological characteristics of a group of children who are hard of hearing, identify individual predictor variables for timely follow-up after a failed newborn hearing screening, and identify barriers to follow-up encountered by families. Method: The authors used an accelerated longitudinal design to investigate outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in a large, multicenter study. The present study involved a subgroup of 193 children with hearing loss who did not pass the newborn hearing screening. The authors used available records to capture ages of confirmation of hearing loss, hearing aid fitting, and entry into early intervention. Linear regression models were used to investigate relationships among individual predictor variables and age at each follow-up benchmark. Results: Of several predictor variables, only higher levels of maternal education were significantly associated with earlier confirmation of hearing loss and fitting of hearing aids; severity of hearing loss was not. No variables were significantly associated with age of entry into early intervention. Each recommended benchmark was met by a majority of children, but only one third met all of the benchmarks within the recommended time frame. Conclusion: Results suggest that underserved communities need extra support in navigating steps that follow failed newborn hearing screening.

AB - Purpose: To document the epidemiological characteristics of a group of children who are hard of hearing, identify individual predictor variables for timely follow-up after a failed newborn hearing screening, and identify barriers to follow-up encountered by families. Method: The authors used an accelerated longitudinal design to investigate outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in a large, multicenter study. The present study involved a subgroup of 193 children with hearing loss who did not pass the newborn hearing screening. The authors used available records to capture ages of confirmation of hearing loss, hearing aid fitting, and entry into early intervention. Linear regression models were used to investigate relationships among individual predictor variables and age at each follow-up benchmark. Results: Of several predictor variables, only higher levels of maternal education were significantly associated with earlier confirmation of hearing loss and fitting of hearing aids; severity of hearing loss was not. No variables were significantly associated with age of entry into early intervention. Each recommended benchmark was met by a majority of children, but only one third met all of the benchmarks within the recommended time frame. Conclusion: Results suggest that underserved communities need extra support in navigating steps that follow failed newborn hearing screening.

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Infants

KW - Screening

KW - Universal newborn hearing screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871517174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871517174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0016)

DO - 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0016)

M3 - Article

C2 - 22585937

AN - SCOPUS:84871517174

VL - 21

SP - 163

EP - 174

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 2

ER -