Factors explaining variability among caregivers in the intent to restrict life-support interventions in a pediatric intensive care unit

Adrienne G. Randolph, Mary B. Zollo, Robert Swift Wigton, Timothy S. Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explore patient-related factors which influence the decisions of pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers to restrict life- support interventions. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: A university- affiliated pediatric ICU. Subjects: All physicians and nurses caring for oncology or cardiology ICU patients. Interventions: Seven patient characteristics were systematically presented in 16 theoretical case scenarios. Measurements and Main Results: Individual linear regression models were constructed for each participant by calculating the importance caregivers placed on seven patient characteristics when deciding about starting intravenous vasopressors, performing chest compressions, and withdrawing life support. We compared the numerical and descriptive (very low, low, moderate, high) probability of survival. We surveyed 86 caregivers and 56 (65%) responded. The most important factors influencing decisions were family preferences (76% of decisions), followed by probability of survival (50%), and functional status (47%). There was marked variability among respondents in 38 (79%)/48 of the questions; 20% to 50% of caregivers chose opposing directions of patient management when they were asked to indicate the likelihood that they would perform a specific life-support intervention. The same term was never used by all respondents to describe the probability of survival for s scenario. Conclusion: Critically III children and their families could face markedly different attitudes about the restriction of life-support interventions, depending on which nurses and physicians are involved in their care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-439
Number of pages5
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1997

Fingerprint

Pediatric Intensive Care Units
Caregivers
Survival
Linear Models
Nurses
Physicians
Cardiology
Intensive Care Units
Thorax
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • decision-making
  • judgment
  • life support
  • pediatric intensive care
  • withdrawal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Factors explaining variability among caregivers in the intent to restrict life-support interventions in a pediatric intensive care unit. / Randolph, Adrienne G.; Zollo, Mary B.; Wigton, Robert Swift; Yeh, Timothy S.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.03.1997, p. 435-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{935866523bdc4388a97a82cdbbe126cf,
title = "Factors explaining variability among caregivers in the intent to restrict life-support interventions in a pediatric intensive care unit",
abstract = "Objective: To explore patient-related factors which influence the decisions of pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers to restrict life- support interventions. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: A university- affiliated pediatric ICU. Subjects: All physicians and nurses caring for oncology or cardiology ICU patients. Interventions: Seven patient characteristics were systematically presented in 16 theoretical case scenarios. Measurements and Main Results: Individual linear regression models were constructed for each participant by calculating the importance caregivers placed on seven patient characteristics when deciding about starting intravenous vasopressors, performing chest compressions, and withdrawing life support. We compared the numerical and descriptive (very low, low, moderate, high) probability of survival. We surveyed 86 caregivers and 56 (65{\%}) responded. The most important factors influencing decisions were family preferences (76{\%} of decisions), followed by probability of survival (50{\%}), and functional status (47{\%}). There was marked variability among respondents in 38 (79{\%})/48 of the questions; 20{\%} to 50{\%} of caregivers chose opposing directions of patient management when they were asked to indicate the likelihood that they would perform a specific life-support intervention. The same term was never used by all respondents to describe the probability of survival for s scenario. Conclusion: Critically III children and their families could face markedly different attitudes about the restriction of life-support interventions, depending on which nurses and physicians are involved in their care.",
keywords = "decision-making, judgment, life support, pediatric intensive care, withdrawal",
author = "Randolph, {Adrienne G.} and Zollo, {Mary B.} and Wigton, {Robert Swift} and Yeh, {Timothy S.}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00003246-199703000-00011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "435--439",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors explaining variability among caregivers in the intent to restrict life-support interventions in a pediatric intensive care unit

AU - Randolph, Adrienne G.

AU - Zollo, Mary B.

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

AU - Yeh, Timothy S.

PY - 1997/3/1

Y1 - 1997/3/1

N2 - Objective: To explore patient-related factors which influence the decisions of pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers to restrict life- support interventions. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: A university- affiliated pediatric ICU. Subjects: All physicians and nurses caring for oncology or cardiology ICU patients. Interventions: Seven patient characteristics were systematically presented in 16 theoretical case scenarios. Measurements and Main Results: Individual linear regression models were constructed for each participant by calculating the importance caregivers placed on seven patient characteristics when deciding about starting intravenous vasopressors, performing chest compressions, and withdrawing life support. We compared the numerical and descriptive (very low, low, moderate, high) probability of survival. We surveyed 86 caregivers and 56 (65%) responded. The most important factors influencing decisions were family preferences (76% of decisions), followed by probability of survival (50%), and functional status (47%). There was marked variability among respondents in 38 (79%)/48 of the questions; 20% to 50% of caregivers chose opposing directions of patient management when they were asked to indicate the likelihood that they would perform a specific life-support intervention. The same term was never used by all respondents to describe the probability of survival for s scenario. Conclusion: Critically III children and their families could face markedly different attitudes about the restriction of life-support interventions, depending on which nurses and physicians are involved in their care.

AB - Objective: To explore patient-related factors which influence the decisions of pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers to restrict life- support interventions. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: A university- affiliated pediatric ICU. Subjects: All physicians and nurses caring for oncology or cardiology ICU patients. Interventions: Seven patient characteristics were systematically presented in 16 theoretical case scenarios. Measurements and Main Results: Individual linear regression models were constructed for each participant by calculating the importance caregivers placed on seven patient characteristics when deciding about starting intravenous vasopressors, performing chest compressions, and withdrawing life support. We compared the numerical and descriptive (very low, low, moderate, high) probability of survival. We surveyed 86 caregivers and 56 (65%) responded. The most important factors influencing decisions were family preferences (76% of decisions), followed by probability of survival (50%), and functional status (47%). There was marked variability among respondents in 38 (79%)/48 of the questions; 20% to 50% of caregivers chose opposing directions of patient management when they were asked to indicate the likelihood that they would perform a specific life-support intervention. The same term was never used by all respondents to describe the probability of survival for s scenario. Conclusion: Critically III children and their families could face markedly different attitudes about the restriction of life-support interventions, depending on which nurses and physicians are involved in their care.

KW - decision-making

KW - judgment

KW - life support

KW - pediatric intensive care

KW - withdrawal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030956663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030956663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00011

DO - 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00011

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 435

EP - 439

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 3

ER -