Factors affecting the outcome of exteriorized colon repairs

Jon S. Thompson, Ernest E. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Of 32 penetrating colon injuries managed by repair and exteriorization during the past 5 years 16 (50%) of the exteriorized repairs healed and 16 failed, being converted to colostomies. The overall morbidity was 25%, 19% for the healed anastomoses and 31% for those that failed. The two groups were similar with respect to age, location of injury, presence of shock, presence of associated injuries, and degree of fecal contamination. Significant differences were evident in the mechanism of trauma and the severity of tissue damage. Exteriorization of colon suture lines is a viable alternative in the management of penetrating colon injury. It should be employed primarily in cases where factors other than the tissue injury itself prohibit primary repair. The success of exteriorization can be improved by giving attention to technical details: adequate debridement; wide mobilization; keeping the repair moist; delaying return of the colon until the tenth postoperative day.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-406
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1982

Fingerprint

Colon
Wounds and Injuries
Colostomy
Thromboplastin
Debridement
Sutures
Shock
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Factors affecting the outcome of exteriorized colon repairs. / Thompson, Jon S.; Moore, Ernest E.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 22, No. 5, 05.1982, p. 403-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4efe3906969f472393c0a4b1d3414d9e,
title = "Factors affecting the outcome of exteriorized colon repairs",
abstract = "Of 32 penetrating colon injuries managed by repair and exteriorization during the past 5 years 16 (50{\%}) of the exteriorized repairs healed and 16 failed, being converted to colostomies. The overall morbidity was 25{\%}, 19{\%} for the healed anastomoses and 31{\%} for those that failed. The two groups were similar with respect to age, location of injury, presence of shock, presence of associated injuries, and degree of fecal contamination. Significant differences were evident in the mechanism of trauma and the severity of tissue damage. Exteriorization of colon suture lines is a viable alternative in the management of penetrating colon injury. It should be employed primarily in cases where factors other than the tissue injury itself prohibit primary repair. The success of exteriorization can be improved by giving attention to technical details: adequate debridement; wide mobilization; keeping the repair moist; delaying return of the colon until the tenth postoperative day.",
author = "Thompson, {Jon S.} and Moore, {Ernest E.}",
year = "1982",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-198205000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "403--406",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting the outcome of exteriorized colon repairs

AU - Thompson, Jon S.

AU - Moore, Ernest E.

PY - 1982/5

Y1 - 1982/5

N2 - Of 32 penetrating colon injuries managed by repair and exteriorization during the past 5 years 16 (50%) of the exteriorized repairs healed and 16 failed, being converted to colostomies. The overall morbidity was 25%, 19% for the healed anastomoses and 31% for those that failed. The two groups were similar with respect to age, location of injury, presence of shock, presence of associated injuries, and degree of fecal contamination. Significant differences were evident in the mechanism of trauma and the severity of tissue damage. Exteriorization of colon suture lines is a viable alternative in the management of penetrating colon injury. It should be employed primarily in cases where factors other than the tissue injury itself prohibit primary repair. The success of exteriorization can be improved by giving attention to technical details: adequate debridement; wide mobilization; keeping the repair moist; delaying return of the colon until the tenth postoperative day.

AB - Of 32 penetrating colon injuries managed by repair and exteriorization during the past 5 years 16 (50%) of the exteriorized repairs healed and 16 failed, being converted to colostomies. The overall morbidity was 25%, 19% for the healed anastomoses and 31% for those that failed. The two groups were similar with respect to age, location of injury, presence of shock, presence of associated injuries, and degree of fecal contamination. Significant differences were evident in the mechanism of trauma and the severity of tissue damage. Exteriorization of colon suture lines is a viable alternative in the management of penetrating colon injury. It should be employed primarily in cases where factors other than the tissue injury itself prohibit primary repair. The success of exteriorization can be improved by giving attention to technical details: adequate debridement; wide mobilization; keeping the repair moist; delaying return of the colon until the tenth postoperative day.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019971782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019971782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-198205000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00005373-198205000-00009

M3 - Article

C2 - 7042995

AN - SCOPUS:0019971782

VL - 22

SP - 403

EP - 406

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -