Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale

N. N. SINGH, L. S. DONATELLI, A. BEST, D. E. WILLIAMS, F. J. BARRERA, M. W. LENZ, T. J. LANDRUM, C. R. ELLIS, T. L. MOE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-74
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1993

Fingerprint

Motivation
Residential Facilities
Developmental Disabilities
Disabled Persons
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Students
Problem Behavior
Behavior Problems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

SINGH, N. N., DONATELLI, L. S., BEST, A., WILLIAMS, D. E., BARRERA, F. J., LENZ, M. W., ... MOE, T. L. (1993). Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x

Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale. / SINGH, N. N.; DONATELLI, L. S.; BEST, A.; WILLIAMS, D. E.; BARRERA, F. J.; LENZ, M. W.; LANDRUM, T. J.; ELLIS, C. R.; MOE, T. L.

In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.1993, p. 65-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

SINGH, NN, DONATELLI, LS, BEST, A, WILLIAMS, DE, BARRERA, FJ, LENZ, MW, LANDRUM, TJ, ELLIS, CR & MOE, TL 1993, 'Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale', Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x
SINGH NN, DONATELLI LS, BEST A, WILLIAMS DE, BARRERA FJ, LENZ MW et al. Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1993 Feb;37(1):65-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x
SINGH, N. N. ; DONATELLI, L. S. ; BEST, A. ; WILLIAMS, D. E. ; BARRERA, F. J. ; LENZ, M. W. ; LANDRUM, T. J. ; ELLIS, C. R. ; MOE, T. L. / Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1993 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 65-74.
@article{ef33ffc931b245dc851ef5fc8d961160,
title = "Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale",
abstract = "The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.",
author = "SINGH, {N. N.} and DONATELLI, {L. S.} and A. BEST and WILLIAMS, {D. E.} and BARRERA, {F. J.} and LENZ, {M. W.} and LANDRUM, {T. J.} and ELLIS, {C. R.} and MOE, {T. L.}",
year = "1993",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "65--74",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale

AU - SINGH, N. N.

AU - DONATELLI, L. S.

AU - BEST, A.

AU - WILLIAMS, D. E.

AU - BARRERA, F. J.

AU - LENZ, M. W.

AU - LANDRUM, T. J.

AU - ELLIS, C. R.

AU - MOE, T. L.

PY - 1993/2

Y1 - 1993/2

N2 - The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.

AB - The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027514121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027514121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 8461617

AN - SCOPUS:0027514121

VL - 37

SP - 65

EP - 74

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 1

ER -