Facilitation of luminance grating detection by induced gratings

Mark E. McCourt, Frederick A.A. Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Grating induction causes a homogeneous test field surrounded by sinewave gratings to possess an induced counterphase grating. There is currently no consensus about the stage of visual' processing at which illusory phenomena such as simultaneous brightness contrast are signaled. We measured the masking efficacy of induced gratings by measuring contrast detection thresholds for targets (sinewave luminance gratings) added in phase to both real and induced gratings which were matched in apparent contrast. At spatial frequencies below c. 0.5 c/deg, target detection and discrimination were comparably facilitated by both real and induced low-contrast pedestals (0.5-2%). At higher spatial frequencies (above 1.0 c/deg) facilitation continued to be observed for targets added in-phase to real grating pedestals, but occurred only for targets added out-of-phase with induced pedestal gratings. Higher inducing frequencies by themselves were not responsible for the observed phase shift of facilitation, however, since both real and induced pedestals produced similar target contrast discrimination functions when inducing frequency was varied by manipulating viewing distance (which holds the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height constant). The results imply the existence of at least two types of lateral interactive processes: one producing in-phase facilitation, and a second producing out-of-phase facilitation. The relative contribution of each process depends upon the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2563-2573
Number of pages11
JournalVision research
Volume36
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1996

Keywords

  • Brightness contrast
  • Brightness matching
  • Grating induction
  • Increment threshold
  • Sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Facilitation of luminance grating detection by induced gratings. / McCourt, Mark E.; Kingdom, Frederick A.A.

In: Vision research, Vol. 36, No. 16, 08.1996, p. 2563-2573.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCourt, Mark E. ; Kingdom, Frederick A.A. / Facilitation of luminance grating detection by induced gratings. In: Vision research. 1996 ; Vol. 36, No. 16. pp. 2563-2573.
@article{d783df0fa5494d17a5ff75218456f64a,
title = "Facilitation of luminance grating detection by induced gratings",
abstract = "Grating induction causes a homogeneous test field surrounded by sinewave gratings to possess an induced counterphase grating. There is currently no consensus about the stage of visual' processing at which illusory phenomena such as simultaneous brightness contrast are signaled. We measured the masking efficacy of induced gratings by measuring contrast detection thresholds for targets (sinewave luminance gratings) added in phase to both real and induced gratings which were matched in apparent contrast. At spatial frequencies below c. 0.5 c/deg, target detection and discrimination were comparably facilitated by both real and induced low-contrast pedestals (0.5-2{\%}). At higher spatial frequencies (above 1.0 c/deg) facilitation continued to be observed for targets added in-phase to real grating pedestals, but occurred only for targets added out-of-phase with induced pedestal gratings. Higher inducing frequencies by themselves were not responsible for the observed phase shift of facilitation, however, since both real and induced pedestals produced similar target contrast discrimination functions when inducing frequency was varied by manipulating viewing distance (which holds the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height constant). The results imply the existence of at least two types of lateral interactive processes: one producing in-phase facilitation, and a second producing out-of-phase facilitation. The relative contribution of each process depends upon the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height.",
keywords = "Brightness contrast, Brightness matching, Grating induction, Increment threshold, Sensitivity",
author = "McCourt, {Mark E.} and Kingdom, {Frederick A.A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(95)00244-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2563--2573",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitation of luminance grating detection by induced gratings

AU - McCourt, Mark E.

AU - Kingdom, Frederick A.A.

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - Grating induction causes a homogeneous test field surrounded by sinewave gratings to possess an induced counterphase grating. There is currently no consensus about the stage of visual' processing at which illusory phenomena such as simultaneous brightness contrast are signaled. We measured the masking efficacy of induced gratings by measuring contrast detection thresholds for targets (sinewave luminance gratings) added in phase to both real and induced gratings which were matched in apparent contrast. At spatial frequencies below c. 0.5 c/deg, target detection and discrimination were comparably facilitated by both real and induced low-contrast pedestals (0.5-2%). At higher spatial frequencies (above 1.0 c/deg) facilitation continued to be observed for targets added in-phase to real grating pedestals, but occurred only for targets added out-of-phase with induced pedestal gratings. Higher inducing frequencies by themselves were not responsible for the observed phase shift of facilitation, however, since both real and induced pedestals produced similar target contrast discrimination functions when inducing frequency was varied by manipulating viewing distance (which holds the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height constant). The results imply the existence of at least two types of lateral interactive processes: one producing in-phase facilitation, and a second producing out-of-phase facilitation. The relative contribution of each process depends upon the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height.

AB - Grating induction causes a homogeneous test field surrounded by sinewave gratings to possess an induced counterphase grating. There is currently no consensus about the stage of visual' processing at which illusory phenomena such as simultaneous brightness contrast are signaled. We measured the masking efficacy of induced gratings by measuring contrast detection thresholds for targets (sinewave luminance gratings) added in phase to both real and induced gratings which were matched in apparent contrast. At spatial frequencies below c. 0.5 c/deg, target detection and discrimination were comparably facilitated by both real and induced low-contrast pedestals (0.5-2%). At higher spatial frequencies (above 1.0 c/deg) facilitation continued to be observed for targets added in-phase to real grating pedestals, but occurred only for targets added out-of-phase with induced pedestal gratings. Higher inducing frequencies by themselves were not responsible for the observed phase shift of facilitation, however, since both real and induced pedestals produced similar target contrast discrimination functions when inducing frequency was varied by manipulating viewing distance (which holds the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height constant). The results imply the existence of at least two types of lateral interactive processes: one producing in-phase facilitation, and a second producing out-of-phase facilitation. The relative contribution of each process depends upon the ratio of inducing grating period and test field height.

KW - Brightness contrast

KW - Brightness matching

KW - Grating induction

KW - Increment threshold

KW - Sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030220190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030220190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00244-8

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00244-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 8917816

AN - SCOPUS:0030220190

VL - 36

SP - 2563

EP - 2573

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 16

ER -