Facilitating children's learning of dynamic-display AAC devices

The effect of two instructional methods on the performance of 6- and 7-year-olds with typical development using a dual-screen prototype

Wendy Quach, David R Beukelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the operation of a dynamic-display AAC device in two instructional conditions: corrective feedback (CF) and dual-screen guidance (DSG). In the CF condition prompts/feedback were provided for incorrect responses; the DSG condition used errorless guided instruction only. Twenty-one children with typical development ten 6-year-olds and 11 7-year-olds were randomly assigned to one instructional condition and completed five sessions: three learning/testing, one generalization, and one maintenance. The children were required to reproduce visual sentence stimuli on the AAC device. Differences were found in accuracy and efficiency of 6- and 7-year-olds. The 7-year-olds were more accurate and quicker than the 6-year-olds. Differences due to instructional condition were observed for 6-year-olds only. All children generalized and maintained learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Learning
Equipment and Supplies
Maintenance
Efficiency

Keywords

  • AAC
  • Children
  • Dual screen
  • Errorless learning
  • Instruction
  • Operational competence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{5ca9b4828b0f42449d560e8d196449b9,
title = "Facilitating children's learning of dynamic-display AAC devices: The effect of two instructional methods on the performance of 6- and 7-year-olds with typical development using a dual-screen prototype",
abstract = "This study compared the operation of a dynamic-display AAC device in two instructional conditions: corrective feedback (CF) and dual-screen guidance (DSG). In the CF condition prompts/feedback were provided for incorrect responses; the DSG condition used errorless guided instruction only. Twenty-one children with typical development ten 6-year-olds and 11 7-year-olds were randomly assigned to one instructional condition and completed five sessions: three learning/testing, one generalization, and one maintenance. The children were required to reproduce visual sentence stimuli on the AAC device. Differences were found in accuracy and efficiency of 6- and 7-year-olds. The 7-year-olds were more accurate and quicker than the 6-year-olds. Differences due to instructional condition were observed for 6-year-olds only. All children generalized and maintained learning.",
keywords = "AAC, Children, Dual screen, Errorless learning, Instruction, Operational competence",
author = "Wendy Quach and Beukelman, {David R}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/07434610903561068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication",
issn = "0743-4618",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating children's learning of dynamic-display AAC devices

T2 - The effect of two instructional methods on the performance of 6- and 7-year-olds with typical development using a dual-screen prototype

AU - Quach, Wendy

AU - Beukelman, David R

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - This study compared the operation of a dynamic-display AAC device in two instructional conditions: corrective feedback (CF) and dual-screen guidance (DSG). In the CF condition prompts/feedback were provided for incorrect responses; the DSG condition used errorless guided instruction only. Twenty-one children with typical development ten 6-year-olds and 11 7-year-olds were randomly assigned to one instructional condition and completed five sessions: three learning/testing, one generalization, and one maintenance. The children were required to reproduce visual sentence stimuli on the AAC device. Differences were found in accuracy and efficiency of 6- and 7-year-olds. The 7-year-olds were more accurate and quicker than the 6-year-olds. Differences due to instructional condition were observed for 6-year-olds only. All children generalized and maintained learning.

AB - This study compared the operation of a dynamic-display AAC device in two instructional conditions: corrective feedback (CF) and dual-screen guidance (DSG). In the CF condition prompts/feedback were provided for incorrect responses; the DSG condition used errorless guided instruction only. Twenty-one children with typical development ten 6-year-olds and 11 7-year-olds were randomly assigned to one instructional condition and completed five sessions: three learning/testing, one generalization, and one maintenance. The children were required to reproduce visual sentence stimuli on the AAC device. Differences were found in accuracy and efficiency of 6- and 7-year-olds. The 7-year-olds were more accurate and quicker than the 6-year-olds. Differences due to instructional condition were observed for 6-year-olds only. All children generalized and maintained learning.

KW - AAC

KW - Children

KW - Dual screen

KW - Errorless learning

KW - Instruction

KW - Operational competence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749295030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77749295030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/07434610903561068

DO - 10.3109/07434610903561068

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

JF - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

SN - 0743-4618

IS - 1

ER -