Eye of the beholder

Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments

Richard L Wiener, Sarah J Gervais, Jill Allen, Allissa Marquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social Analytic Jurisprudence instructs researchers to study the reciprocal relations between law and peoples' lives by developing empirical descriptions of legal assumptions about human behavior. The present work introduced a new experimental paradigm to test some of those assumptions by studying the impact of sexual objectification in a simulated job interview on performance, sexual harassment judgments, and emotions for women who experienced (akin to complainants), observed (akin to coworkers or witnesses), or predicted (akin to investigators, EEOC officers, mediators, jurors, or judges,) the impact of sexual objectification. Consistent with hypotheses, sexual objectification resulted in worse performance predictions, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion compared with the control condition, but these effects were moderated by perspective. Overall, predictors estimated worse performance, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion in response to sexual objectification than observers and experiencers. Anticipated negative emotion and self-referencing explained the effects for predictors. Theoretical and practical implications for legal and psychological theory on sexual harassment, objectification, and affective forecasting are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-221
Number of pages16
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2013

Fingerprint

Sexual Harassment
objectification
sexual harassment
Emotions
emotion
Research Personnel
Psychological Theory
job interview
Jurisprudence
performance
legal theory
psychological theory
co-worker
jurisprudence
witness
Interviews
paradigm
Law

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Emotion
  • Hostile work environment
  • Objectification
  • Sexual harassment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Eye of the beholder : Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. / Wiener, Richard L; Gervais, Sarah J; Allen, Jill; Marquez, Allissa.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, 11.09.2013, p. 206-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{500f86bd4f844908bc674be578db886f,
title = "Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments",
abstract = "Social Analytic Jurisprudence instructs researchers to study the reciprocal relations between law and peoples' lives by developing empirical descriptions of legal assumptions about human behavior. The present work introduced a new experimental paradigm to test some of those assumptions by studying the impact of sexual objectification in a simulated job interview on performance, sexual harassment judgments, and emotions for women who experienced (akin to complainants), observed (akin to coworkers or witnesses), or predicted (akin to investigators, EEOC officers, mediators, jurors, or judges,) the impact of sexual objectification. Consistent with hypotheses, sexual objectification resulted in worse performance predictions, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion compared with the control condition, but these effects were moderated by perspective. Overall, predictors estimated worse performance, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion in response to sexual objectification than observers and experiencers. Anticipated negative emotion and self-referencing explained the effects for predictors. Theoretical and practical implications for legal and psychological theory on sexual harassment, objectification, and affective forecasting are discussed.",
keywords = "Discrimination, Emotion, Hostile work environment, Objectification, Sexual harassment",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L} and Gervais, {Sarah J} and Jill Allen and Allissa Marquez",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0028497",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "206--221",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye of the beholder

T2 - Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments

AU - Wiener, Richard L

AU - Gervais, Sarah J

AU - Allen, Jill

AU - Marquez, Allissa

PY - 2013/9/11

Y1 - 2013/9/11

N2 - Social Analytic Jurisprudence instructs researchers to study the reciprocal relations between law and peoples' lives by developing empirical descriptions of legal assumptions about human behavior. The present work introduced a new experimental paradigm to test some of those assumptions by studying the impact of sexual objectification in a simulated job interview on performance, sexual harassment judgments, and emotions for women who experienced (akin to complainants), observed (akin to coworkers or witnesses), or predicted (akin to investigators, EEOC officers, mediators, jurors, or judges,) the impact of sexual objectification. Consistent with hypotheses, sexual objectification resulted in worse performance predictions, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion compared with the control condition, but these effects were moderated by perspective. Overall, predictors estimated worse performance, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion in response to sexual objectification than observers and experiencers. Anticipated negative emotion and self-referencing explained the effects for predictors. Theoretical and practical implications for legal and psychological theory on sexual harassment, objectification, and affective forecasting are discussed.

AB - Social Analytic Jurisprudence instructs researchers to study the reciprocal relations between law and peoples' lives by developing empirical descriptions of legal assumptions about human behavior. The present work introduced a new experimental paradigm to test some of those assumptions by studying the impact of sexual objectification in a simulated job interview on performance, sexual harassment judgments, and emotions for women who experienced (akin to complainants), observed (akin to coworkers or witnesses), or predicted (akin to investigators, EEOC officers, mediators, jurors, or judges,) the impact of sexual objectification. Consistent with hypotheses, sexual objectification resulted in worse performance predictions, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion compared with the control condition, but these effects were moderated by perspective. Overall, predictors estimated worse performance, more sexual harassment, and more negative emotion in response to sexual objectification than observers and experiencers. Anticipated negative emotion and self-referencing explained the effects for predictors. Theoretical and practical implications for legal and psychological theory on sexual harassment, objectification, and affective forecasting are discussed.

KW - Discrimination

KW - Emotion

KW - Hostile work environment

KW - Objectification

KW - Sexual harassment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883525874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883525874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0028497

DO - 10.1037/a0028497

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 206

EP - 221

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 2

ER -