Extending Continuous Versus Discontinuous Conditioned Stimuli Before Versus After Unconditioned Stimuli

Melody Albert, Sean Ricker, Rick A Bevins, John J.B. Ayres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conditioned suppression was used with rats to study the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after the delivery of unconditioned stimuli. These extensions are termed B and A extensions, respectively. Within-group designs were used to compare the effects of extending CSs when 2-min parts of those CSs were separated by temporal gaps of 6 min versus a separation of no gap. The results were as follows: (a) B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions, with or without gaps; (b) under some conditions, this asymmetrical effect persisted with extended training; (c) gaps between 2-min parts of a B extension had no detectable effect; and (d) under some parameter values, gaps between 2-min parts of an A extension weakened conditioning significantly. These results are better predicted by the Sometimes Opponent-Process model (SOP; A. R. Wagner, 1981) than by the Rescorla-Wagner-Frey-Sears real-time model (J. J. B. Ayres, M. Albert, & J. C. Bombace, 1987).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-264
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

conditioning
rats
effect
parameter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Extending Continuous Versus Discontinuous Conditioned Stimuli Before Versus After Unconditioned Stimuli. / Albert, Melody; Ricker, Sean; Bevins, Rick A; Ayres, John J.B.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 255-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{150a678d13f1427c9aa187dcee7a9d17,
title = "Extending Continuous Versus Discontinuous Conditioned Stimuli Before Versus After Unconditioned Stimuli",
abstract = "Conditioned suppression was used with rats to study the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after the delivery of unconditioned stimuli. These extensions are termed B and A extensions, respectively. Within-group designs were used to compare the effects of extending CSs when 2-min parts of those CSs were separated by temporal gaps of 6 min versus a separation of no gap. The results were as follows: (a) B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions, with or without gaps; (b) under some conditions, this asymmetrical effect persisted with extended training; (c) gaps between 2-min parts of a B extension had no detectable effect; and (d) under some parameter values, gaps between 2-min parts of an A extension weakened conditioning significantly. These results are better predicted by the Sometimes Opponent-Process model (SOP; A. R. Wagner, 1981) than by the Rescorla-Wagner-Frey-Sears real-time model (J. J. B. Ayres, M. Albert, & J. C. Bombace, 1987).",
author = "Melody Albert and Sean Ricker and Bevins, {Rick A} and Ayres, {John J.B.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0097-7403.19.3.255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "255--264",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes",
issn = "0097-7403",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extending Continuous Versus Discontinuous Conditioned Stimuli Before Versus After Unconditioned Stimuli

AU - Albert, Melody

AU - Ricker, Sean

AU - Bevins, Rick A

AU - Ayres, John J.B.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Conditioned suppression was used with rats to study the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after the delivery of unconditioned stimuli. These extensions are termed B and A extensions, respectively. Within-group designs were used to compare the effects of extending CSs when 2-min parts of those CSs were separated by temporal gaps of 6 min versus a separation of no gap. The results were as follows: (a) B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions, with or without gaps; (b) under some conditions, this asymmetrical effect persisted with extended training; (c) gaps between 2-min parts of a B extension had no detectable effect; and (d) under some parameter values, gaps between 2-min parts of an A extension weakened conditioning significantly. These results are better predicted by the Sometimes Opponent-Process model (SOP; A. R. Wagner, 1981) than by the Rescorla-Wagner-Frey-Sears real-time model (J. J. B. Ayres, M. Albert, & J. C. Bombace, 1987).

AB - Conditioned suppression was used with rats to study the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after the delivery of unconditioned stimuli. These extensions are termed B and A extensions, respectively. Within-group designs were used to compare the effects of extending CSs when 2-min parts of those CSs were separated by temporal gaps of 6 min versus a separation of no gap. The results were as follows: (a) B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions, with or without gaps; (b) under some conditions, this asymmetrical effect persisted with extended training; (c) gaps between 2-min parts of a B extension had no detectable effect; and (d) under some parameter values, gaps between 2-min parts of an A extension weakened conditioning significantly. These results are better predicted by the Sometimes Opponent-Process model (SOP; A. R. Wagner, 1981) than by the Rescorla-Wagner-Frey-Sears real-time model (J. J. B. Ayres, M. Albert, & J. C. Bombace, 1987).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027638720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027638720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0097-7403.19.3.255

DO - 10.1037/0097-7403.19.3.255

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 255

EP - 264

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

SN - 0097-7403

IS - 3

ER -