Extended communication samples of augmented communicators I

A comparison of individualized versus standard single-word vocabularies

K. M. Yorkston, K. Smith, David R Beukelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vocabulary selection for linguistically intact augmented communicators is a growing clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the relative benefits of word lists that were individualized for these augmented subjects to word lists selected from standard vocabulary sources. Communication samples were collected for 14 consecutive days from 10 subjects who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. These samples were analyzed to determine the frequency of single word occurrence, and the results were compared with those obtained form analysis of standard vocabulary lists. The conclusions of the study were (a) that when vocabulary lists can represent a large proportion of the total communication sample; (b) that individualized word lists are more efficient than standard vocabulary lists, if efficiency is defined as a large proportion of the total sample represented by a small list; and (c) that if used in their entirety, standard lists are not efficient because they contain a large number of words that are rarely used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-224
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Vocabulary
communicator
vocabulary
communication
Communication
Communicators
Equipment and Supplies
efficiency
Word Lists
Proportion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Extended communication samples of augmented communicators I : A comparison of individualized versus standard single-word vocabularies. / Yorkston, K. M.; Smith, K.; Beukelman, David R.

In: Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.01.1990, p. 217-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d79c6ed2eff84c7bbd6e5be158d863e3,
title = "Extended communication samples of augmented communicators I: A comparison of individualized versus standard single-word vocabularies",
abstract = "Vocabulary selection for linguistically intact augmented communicators is a growing clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the relative benefits of word lists that were individualized for these augmented subjects to word lists selected from standard vocabulary sources. Communication samples were collected for 14 consecutive days from 10 subjects who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. These samples were analyzed to determine the frequency of single word occurrence, and the results were compared with those obtained form analysis of standard vocabulary lists. The conclusions of the study were (a) that when vocabulary lists can represent a large proportion of the total communication sample; (b) that individualized word lists are more efficient than standard vocabulary lists, if efficiency is defined as a large proportion of the total sample represented by a small list; and (c) that if used in their entirety, standard lists are not efficient because they contain a large number of words that are rarely used.",
author = "Yorkston, {K. M.} and K. Smith and Beukelman, {David R}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/jshd.5502.217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "217--224",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extended communication samples of augmented communicators I

T2 - A comparison of individualized versus standard single-word vocabularies

AU - Yorkston, K. M.

AU - Smith, K.

AU - Beukelman, David R

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Vocabulary selection for linguistically intact augmented communicators is a growing clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the relative benefits of word lists that were individualized for these augmented subjects to word lists selected from standard vocabulary sources. Communication samples were collected for 14 consecutive days from 10 subjects who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. These samples were analyzed to determine the frequency of single word occurrence, and the results were compared with those obtained form analysis of standard vocabulary lists. The conclusions of the study were (a) that when vocabulary lists can represent a large proportion of the total communication sample; (b) that individualized word lists are more efficient than standard vocabulary lists, if efficiency is defined as a large proportion of the total sample represented by a small list; and (c) that if used in their entirety, standard lists are not efficient because they contain a large number of words that are rarely used.

AB - Vocabulary selection for linguistically intact augmented communicators is a growing clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the relative benefits of word lists that were individualized for these augmented subjects to word lists selected from standard vocabulary sources. Communication samples were collected for 14 consecutive days from 10 subjects who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. These samples were analyzed to determine the frequency of single word occurrence, and the results were compared with those obtained form analysis of standard vocabulary lists. The conclusions of the study were (a) that when vocabulary lists can represent a large proportion of the total communication sample; (b) that individualized word lists are more efficient than standard vocabulary lists, if efficiency is defined as a large proportion of the total sample represented by a small list; and (c) that if used in their entirety, standard lists are not efficient because they contain a large number of words that are rarely used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025362331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025362331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/jshd.5502.217

DO - 10.1044/jshd.5502.217

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 217

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 2

ER -