Exploring the gender gap: Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship

A. Hoffman, Rachel Ghoubrial, Melanie McCormick, Praise Matemavi, Robert Cusick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Letters of recommendation (LoR) are considered one of the most important predictors of matching into a pediatric surgery fellowship. We determined if gendered differences exist in LoR written for resident candidates. Methods: A retrospective review of blinded LoR to a fellowship program between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Results: Of the 364 LoR reviewed for 49 female and 48 male applicants, male surgeons wrote 82.5% of letters. Male LoR contained more agentic terms (p = 0. 042), first name occurrences (p = 0.0082) and phrase “future success” (p = 0.015). Female letters included more socio-communal phrases (p = 0. 010) and 5% referenced a spouse's accomplishments vs. 0% of male letters. Male LoR contained more active possessive language (p-0. 027); ie: “he published”, “he presented”. We found no difference in an applicant's research experience (p = 0.06) or leadership qualities (p = 0. 067). Conclusion: Gender differences exist in LoR written for fellowship applicants applying to a highly competitive subspecialty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Spouses
Names
Language
Research

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Letters of recommendation
  • Training/fellowship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Exploring the gender gap : Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship. / Hoffman, A.; Ghoubrial, Rachel; McCormick, Melanie; Matemavi, Praise; Cusick, Robert.

In: American journal of surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoffman, A. ; Ghoubrial, Rachel ; McCormick, Melanie ; Matemavi, Praise ; Cusick, Robert. / Exploring the gender gap : Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship. In: American journal of surgery. 2019.
@article{43bde56d94544321898aae245c8ebdd7,
title = "Exploring the gender gap: Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship",
abstract = "Background: Letters of recommendation (LoR) are considered one of the most important predictors of matching into a pediatric surgery fellowship. We determined if gendered differences exist in LoR written for resident candidates. Methods: A retrospective review of blinded LoR to a fellowship program between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Results: Of the 364 LoR reviewed for 49 female and 48 male applicants, male surgeons wrote 82.5{\%} of letters. Male LoR contained more agentic terms (p = 0. 042), first name occurrences (p = 0.0082) and phrase “future success” (p = 0.015). Female letters included more socio-communal phrases (p = 0. 010) and 5{\%} referenced a spouse's accomplishments vs. 0{\%} of male letters. Male LoR contained more active possessive language (p-0. 027); ie: “he published”, “he presented”. We found no difference in an applicant's research experience (p = 0.06) or leadership qualities (p = 0. 067). Conclusion: Gender differences exist in LoR written for fellowship applicants applying to a highly competitive subspecialty.",
keywords = "Gender, Letters of recommendation, Training/fellowship",
author = "A. Hoffman and Rachel Ghoubrial and Melanie McCormick and Praise Matemavi and Robert Cusick",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the gender gap

T2 - Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship

AU - Hoffman, A.

AU - Ghoubrial, Rachel

AU - McCormick, Melanie

AU - Matemavi, Praise

AU - Cusick, Robert

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Letters of recommendation (LoR) are considered one of the most important predictors of matching into a pediatric surgery fellowship. We determined if gendered differences exist in LoR written for resident candidates. Methods: A retrospective review of blinded LoR to a fellowship program between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Results: Of the 364 LoR reviewed for 49 female and 48 male applicants, male surgeons wrote 82.5% of letters. Male LoR contained more agentic terms (p = 0. 042), first name occurrences (p = 0.0082) and phrase “future success” (p = 0.015). Female letters included more socio-communal phrases (p = 0. 010) and 5% referenced a spouse's accomplishments vs. 0% of male letters. Male LoR contained more active possessive language (p-0. 027); ie: “he published”, “he presented”. We found no difference in an applicant's research experience (p = 0.06) or leadership qualities (p = 0. 067). Conclusion: Gender differences exist in LoR written for fellowship applicants applying to a highly competitive subspecialty.

AB - Background: Letters of recommendation (LoR) are considered one of the most important predictors of matching into a pediatric surgery fellowship. We determined if gendered differences exist in LoR written for resident candidates. Methods: A retrospective review of blinded LoR to a fellowship program between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Results: Of the 364 LoR reviewed for 49 female and 48 male applicants, male surgeons wrote 82.5% of letters. Male LoR contained more agentic terms (p = 0. 042), first name occurrences (p = 0.0082) and phrase “future success” (p = 0.015). Female letters included more socio-communal phrases (p = 0. 010) and 5% referenced a spouse's accomplishments vs. 0% of male letters. Male LoR contained more active possessive language (p-0. 027); ie: “he published”, “he presented”. We found no difference in an applicant's research experience (p = 0.06) or leadership qualities (p = 0. 067). Conclusion: Gender differences exist in LoR written for fellowship applicants applying to a highly competitive subspecialty.

KW - Gender

KW - Letters of recommendation

KW - Training/fellowship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070514247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070514247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 31416590

AN - SCOPUS:85070514247

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

ER -