Exploring creative mindsets: Variable and person-centered approaches

Maciej Karwowski, Ryan P. Royston, Roni Reiter-Palmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies on creative mindsets have demonstrated that people do not necessarily conceptualize creativity as either fixed (unchangeable) or malleable (able to be grown) but instead use both terms while describing creative behaviors and traits. Because people can see creative ability as both a fixed and malleable trait, this seemingly contradictory view may stem from the fact that people use information about different components and levels of creative expertise when making that judgment. Here, by integrating variable- and person-centered approaches to studying creative mindsets, we aimed to provide a more authoritative answer to this issue. A large sample (N = 3,876) of Polish adults completed the Creative Mindset Scale, with smaller subsamples also completing different measures of creative selfconcept, creative ability, creative activity, and creative achievement. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the 2-factor model, with correlated yet relatively independent fixed and growth creative mindsets, fit the data better than did the general factor model, in which fixed and malleable mindsets are seen as being on a continuum. We found that although the better fit of the 2-factor model demonstrated that people indeed describe creativity in both fixed and malleable ways, the general factor orientation may shape their perception as well. A latent profile analysis revealed the existence of 4 classes of people: those holding high growth and low fixed mindsets and those holding low growth and high fixed mindsets but also those holding high growth and high fixed mindsets as well as those holding low fixed and malleable mindsets. The high growth-high fixed type was characterized by the highest creative self-concept (especially creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity), average activity and achievement, and relatively low creative ability. We discuss these findings in terms of creative mindsets theory and propose further research areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-48
Number of pages13
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Creativity
Growth
Self Efficacy
Self Concept
Statistical Factor Analysis
Person
Research

Keywords

  • Bifactor models
  • Creative achievement
  • Creative mindsets
  • Creative self-concept
  • Latent profile analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Exploring creative mindsets : Variable and person-centered approaches. / Karwowski, Maciej; Royston, Ryan P.; Reiter-Palmon, Roni.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 36-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8bc18c7b4a24fc693768f654d66631b,
title = "Exploring creative mindsets: Variable and person-centered approaches",
abstract = "Previous studies on creative mindsets have demonstrated that people do not necessarily conceptualize creativity as either fixed (unchangeable) or malleable (able to be grown) but instead use both terms while describing creative behaviors and traits. Because people can see creative ability as both a fixed and malleable trait, this seemingly contradictory view may stem from the fact that people use information about different components and levels of creative expertise when making that judgment. Here, by integrating variable- and person-centered approaches to studying creative mindsets, we aimed to provide a more authoritative answer to this issue. A large sample (N = 3,876) of Polish adults completed the Creative Mindset Scale, with smaller subsamples also completing different measures of creative selfconcept, creative ability, creative activity, and creative achievement. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the 2-factor model, with correlated yet relatively independent fixed and growth creative mindsets, fit the data better than did the general factor model, in which fixed and malleable mindsets are seen as being on a continuum. We found that although the better fit of the 2-factor model demonstrated that people indeed describe creativity in both fixed and malleable ways, the general factor orientation may shape their perception as well. A latent profile analysis revealed the existence of 4 classes of people: those holding high growth and low fixed mindsets and those holding low growth and high fixed mindsets but also those holding high growth and high fixed mindsets as well as those holding low fixed and malleable mindsets. The high growth-high fixed type was characterized by the highest creative self-concept (especially creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity), average activity and achievement, and relatively low creative ability. We discuss these findings in terms of creative mindsets theory and propose further research areas.",
keywords = "Bifactor models, Creative achievement, Creative mindsets, Creative self-concept, Latent profile analysis",
author = "Maciej Karwowski and Royston, {Ryan P.} and Roni Reiter-Palmon",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/aca0000170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "36--48",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring creative mindsets

T2 - Variable and person-centered approaches

AU - Karwowski, Maciej

AU - Royston, Ryan P.

AU - Reiter-Palmon, Roni

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Previous studies on creative mindsets have demonstrated that people do not necessarily conceptualize creativity as either fixed (unchangeable) or malleable (able to be grown) but instead use both terms while describing creative behaviors and traits. Because people can see creative ability as both a fixed and malleable trait, this seemingly contradictory view may stem from the fact that people use information about different components and levels of creative expertise when making that judgment. Here, by integrating variable- and person-centered approaches to studying creative mindsets, we aimed to provide a more authoritative answer to this issue. A large sample (N = 3,876) of Polish adults completed the Creative Mindset Scale, with smaller subsamples also completing different measures of creative selfconcept, creative ability, creative activity, and creative achievement. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the 2-factor model, with correlated yet relatively independent fixed and growth creative mindsets, fit the data better than did the general factor model, in which fixed and malleable mindsets are seen as being on a continuum. We found that although the better fit of the 2-factor model demonstrated that people indeed describe creativity in both fixed and malleable ways, the general factor orientation may shape their perception as well. A latent profile analysis revealed the existence of 4 classes of people: those holding high growth and low fixed mindsets and those holding low growth and high fixed mindsets but also those holding high growth and high fixed mindsets as well as those holding low fixed and malleable mindsets. The high growth-high fixed type was characterized by the highest creative self-concept (especially creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity), average activity and achievement, and relatively low creative ability. We discuss these findings in terms of creative mindsets theory and propose further research areas.

AB - Previous studies on creative mindsets have demonstrated that people do not necessarily conceptualize creativity as either fixed (unchangeable) or malleable (able to be grown) but instead use both terms while describing creative behaviors and traits. Because people can see creative ability as both a fixed and malleable trait, this seemingly contradictory view may stem from the fact that people use information about different components and levels of creative expertise when making that judgment. Here, by integrating variable- and person-centered approaches to studying creative mindsets, we aimed to provide a more authoritative answer to this issue. A large sample (N = 3,876) of Polish adults completed the Creative Mindset Scale, with smaller subsamples also completing different measures of creative selfconcept, creative ability, creative activity, and creative achievement. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the 2-factor model, with correlated yet relatively independent fixed and growth creative mindsets, fit the data better than did the general factor model, in which fixed and malleable mindsets are seen as being on a continuum. We found that although the better fit of the 2-factor model demonstrated that people indeed describe creativity in both fixed and malleable ways, the general factor orientation may shape their perception as well. A latent profile analysis revealed the existence of 4 classes of people: those holding high growth and low fixed mindsets and those holding low growth and high fixed mindsets but also those holding high growth and high fixed mindsets as well as those holding low fixed and malleable mindsets. The high growth-high fixed type was characterized by the highest creative self-concept (especially creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity), average activity and achievement, and relatively low creative ability. We discuss these findings in terms of creative mindsets theory and propose further research areas.

KW - Bifactor models

KW - Creative achievement

KW - Creative mindsets

KW - Creative self-concept

KW - Latent profile analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046131659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046131659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/aca0000170

DO - 10.1037/aca0000170

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046131659

VL - 13

SP - 36

EP - 48

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 1

ER -