Explanation in information systems

Dirk S. Hovorka, Matt Germonprez, Kai R. Larsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Explanation of observed phenomena is a major objective of both those who conduct and those who apply research in information systems (IS). Whereas explanation based on the statistical relationship between independent and dependent variables is a common outcome of explanatory IS research, philosophers of science disagree about whether statistical relationships are the sole basis for the explanation of phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to introduce an expanded concept of explanation into the realm of IS research. We present a framework based on the four principle explanation types defined in modern philosophy: covering-law explanation, statistical-relevance explanation, contrast-class explanation and functional explanation. A well-established research stream, media richness, is used to illustrate how the different explanation types complement each other in increasing comprehension of the phenomenon. This framework underlies our argument that explanatory pluralism can be used to broaden research perspectives and increase scientific comprehension of IS phenomena above and beyond the methodological and ontological pluralism currently in use in IS research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-43
Number of pages21
JournalInformation Systems Journal
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

information system
Information systems
systems research
pluralism
comprehension
communication research
Law
science

Keywords

  • Explanation
  • Information systems
  • Ontology
  • Philosophy of science
  • Research method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Explanation in information systems. / Hovorka, Dirk S.; Germonprez, Matt; Larsen, Kai R.

In: Information Systems Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 23-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hovorka, Dirk S. ; Germonprez, Matt ; Larsen, Kai R. / Explanation in information systems. In: Information Systems Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 23-43.
@article{861b8b1b42074fcab247d95575c8ceb0,
title = "Explanation in information systems",
abstract = "Explanation of observed phenomena is a major objective of both those who conduct and those who apply research in information systems (IS). Whereas explanation based on the statistical relationship between independent and dependent variables is a common outcome of explanatory IS research, philosophers of science disagree about whether statistical relationships are the sole basis for the explanation of phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to introduce an expanded concept of explanation into the realm of IS research. We present a framework based on the four principle explanation types defined in modern philosophy: covering-law explanation, statistical-relevance explanation, contrast-class explanation and functional explanation. A well-established research stream, media richness, is used to illustrate how the different explanation types complement each other in increasing comprehension of the phenomenon. This framework underlies our argument that explanatory pluralism can be used to broaden research perspectives and increase scientific comprehension of IS phenomena above and beyond the methodological and ontological pluralism currently in use in IS research.",
keywords = "Explanation, Information systems, Ontology, Philosophy of science, Research method",
author = "Hovorka, {Dirk S.} and Matt Germonprez and Larsen, {Kai R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00271.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "23--43",
journal = "Information Systems Journal",
issn = "1350-1917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explanation in information systems

AU - Hovorka, Dirk S.

AU - Germonprez, Matt

AU - Larsen, Kai R.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Explanation of observed phenomena is a major objective of both those who conduct and those who apply research in information systems (IS). Whereas explanation based on the statistical relationship between independent and dependent variables is a common outcome of explanatory IS research, philosophers of science disagree about whether statistical relationships are the sole basis for the explanation of phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to introduce an expanded concept of explanation into the realm of IS research. We present a framework based on the four principle explanation types defined in modern philosophy: covering-law explanation, statistical-relevance explanation, contrast-class explanation and functional explanation. A well-established research stream, media richness, is used to illustrate how the different explanation types complement each other in increasing comprehension of the phenomenon. This framework underlies our argument that explanatory pluralism can be used to broaden research perspectives and increase scientific comprehension of IS phenomena above and beyond the methodological and ontological pluralism currently in use in IS research.

AB - Explanation of observed phenomena is a major objective of both those who conduct and those who apply research in information systems (IS). Whereas explanation based on the statistical relationship between independent and dependent variables is a common outcome of explanatory IS research, philosophers of science disagree about whether statistical relationships are the sole basis for the explanation of phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to introduce an expanded concept of explanation into the realm of IS research. We present a framework based on the four principle explanation types defined in modern philosophy: covering-law explanation, statistical-relevance explanation, contrast-class explanation and functional explanation. A well-established research stream, media richness, is used to illustrate how the different explanation types complement each other in increasing comprehension of the phenomenon. This framework underlies our argument that explanatory pluralism can be used to broaden research perspectives and increase scientific comprehension of IS phenomena above and beyond the methodological and ontological pluralism currently in use in IS research.

KW - Explanation

KW - Information systems

KW - Ontology

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Research method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38749085683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38749085683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00271.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00271.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38749085683

VL - 18

SP - 23

EP - 43

JO - Information Systems Journal

JF - Information Systems Journal

SN - 1350-1917

IS - 1

ER -