Exoskeleton assistance symmetry matters: Unilateral assistance reduces metabolic cost, but relatively less than bilateral assistance

Philippe Malcolm, Samuel Galle, Pieter Van Den Berghe, Dirk De Clercq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many gait impairments are characterized by asymmetry and result in reduced mobility. Exoskeletons could be useful for restoring gait symmetry by assisting only one leg. However, we still have limited understanding of the effects of unilateral exoskeleton assistance. Our aim was to compare the effects of unilateral and bilateral assistance using a within-subject study design. Methods: Eleven participants walked in different exoskeleton conditions. In the Unilateral conditions, only one leg was assisted. In Bilateral Matched Total Work, half of the assistance from the Unilateral conditions was applied to both legs such that the bilateral sum was equal to that of the Unilateral conditions. In Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg, the same assistance as in the Unilateral conditions was provided to both legs such that the bilateral sum was the double of that of the Unilateral conditions. In the Powered-Off condition, no assistance was provided. We measured metabolic energy consumption, exoskeleton mechanics and kinematics. Results: On average, the Unilateral, Bilateral Matched Total Work and Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg conditions reduced the metabolic rate by 7, 11 and 15%, respectively, compared with the Powered-Off condition. A possible explanation for why the Unilateral conditions effectively reduced the metabolic rate could be that they caused only very little asymmetry in gait biomechanics, except at the ankle and in the horizontal center-of-mass velocity. We found the highest ratio of metabolic rate reduction versus positive work assistance with bilateral assistance and low work per leg (Bilateral Matched Total Work). Statistical analysis indicated that assistance symmetry and assistance per leg are more important than the bilateral summed assistance for reducing the metabolic rate of walking. Conclusions: These data bridge the gap between conclusions from studies with unilateral and bilateral exoskeletons and inform how unilateral assistance can be used to influence gait parameters, such as center-of-mass velocity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number74
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 9 2018

Fingerprint

Leg
Costs and Cost Analysis
Gait
Biomechanical Phenomena
Mechanics
Ankle
Walking

Keywords

  • Ankle
  • Asymmetry
  • Bilateral
  • Exoskeleton
  • Magnitude
  • Metabolic
  • Symmetry
  • Unilateral
  • Walking
  • Work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Exoskeleton assistance symmetry matters : Unilateral assistance reduces metabolic cost, but relatively less than bilateral assistance. / Malcolm, Philippe; Galle, Samuel; Van Den Berghe, Pieter; De Clercq, Dirk.

In: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 74, 09.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b16fdd4a91643749e05bc03a7c074d1,
title = "Exoskeleton assistance symmetry matters: Unilateral assistance reduces metabolic cost, but relatively less than bilateral assistance",
abstract = "Background: Many gait impairments are characterized by asymmetry and result in reduced mobility. Exoskeletons could be useful for restoring gait symmetry by assisting only one leg. However, we still have limited understanding of the effects of unilateral exoskeleton assistance. Our aim was to compare the effects of unilateral and bilateral assistance using a within-subject study design. Methods: Eleven participants walked in different exoskeleton conditions. In the Unilateral conditions, only one leg was assisted. In Bilateral Matched Total Work, half of the assistance from the Unilateral conditions was applied to both legs such that the bilateral sum was equal to that of the Unilateral conditions. In Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg, the same assistance as in the Unilateral conditions was provided to both legs such that the bilateral sum was the double of that of the Unilateral conditions. In the Powered-Off condition, no assistance was provided. We measured metabolic energy consumption, exoskeleton mechanics and kinematics. Results: On average, the Unilateral, Bilateral Matched Total Work and Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg conditions reduced the metabolic rate by 7, 11 and 15{\%}, respectively, compared with the Powered-Off condition. A possible explanation for why the Unilateral conditions effectively reduced the metabolic rate could be that they caused only very little asymmetry in gait biomechanics, except at the ankle and in the horizontal center-of-mass velocity. We found the highest ratio of metabolic rate reduction versus positive work assistance with bilateral assistance and low work per leg (Bilateral Matched Total Work). Statistical analysis indicated that assistance symmetry and assistance per leg are more important than the bilateral summed assistance for reducing the metabolic rate of walking. Conclusions: These data bridge the gap between conclusions from studies with unilateral and bilateral exoskeletons and inform how unilateral assistance can be used to influence gait parameters, such as center-of-mass velocity.",
keywords = "Ankle, Asymmetry, Bilateral, Exoskeleton, Magnitude, Metabolic, Symmetry, Unilateral, Walking, Work",
author = "Philippe Malcolm and Samuel Galle and {Van Den Berghe}, Pieter and {De Clercq}, Dirk",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/s12984-018-0381-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation",
issn = "1743-0003",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exoskeleton assistance symmetry matters

T2 - Unilateral assistance reduces metabolic cost, but relatively less than bilateral assistance

AU - Malcolm, Philippe

AU - Galle, Samuel

AU - Van Den Berghe, Pieter

AU - De Clercq, Dirk

PY - 2018/8/9

Y1 - 2018/8/9

N2 - Background: Many gait impairments are characterized by asymmetry and result in reduced mobility. Exoskeletons could be useful for restoring gait symmetry by assisting only one leg. However, we still have limited understanding of the effects of unilateral exoskeleton assistance. Our aim was to compare the effects of unilateral and bilateral assistance using a within-subject study design. Methods: Eleven participants walked in different exoskeleton conditions. In the Unilateral conditions, only one leg was assisted. In Bilateral Matched Total Work, half of the assistance from the Unilateral conditions was applied to both legs such that the bilateral sum was equal to that of the Unilateral conditions. In Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg, the same assistance as in the Unilateral conditions was provided to both legs such that the bilateral sum was the double of that of the Unilateral conditions. In the Powered-Off condition, no assistance was provided. We measured metabolic energy consumption, exoskeleton mechanics and kinematics. Results: On average, the Unilateral, Bilateral Matched Total Work and Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg conditions reduced the metabolic rate by 7, 11 and 15%, respectively, compared with the Powered-Off condition. A possible explanation for why the Unilateral conditions effectively reduced the metabolic rate could be that they caused only very little asymmetry in gait biomechanics, except at the ankle and in the horizontal center-of-mass velocity. We found the highest ratio of metabolic rate reduction versus positive work assistance with bilateral assistance and low work per leg (Bilateral Matched Total Work). Statistical analysis indicated that assistance symmetry and assistance per leg are more important than the bilateral summed assistance for reducing the metabolic rate of walking. Conclusions: These data bridge the gap between conclusions from studies with unilateral and bilateral exoskeletons and inform how unilateral assistance can be used to influence gait parameters, such as center-of-mass velocity.

AB - Background: Many gait impairments are characterized by asymmetry and result in reduced mobility. Exoskeletons could be useful for restoring gait symmetry by assisting only one leg. However, we still have limited understanding of the effects of unilateral exoskeleton assistance. Our aim was to compare the effects of unilateral and bilateral assistance using a within-subject study design. Methods: Eleven participants walked in different exoskeleton conditions. In the Unilateral conditions, only one leg was assisted. In Bilateral Matched Total Work, half of the assistance from the Unilateral conditions was applied to both legs such that the bilateral sum was equal to that of the Unilateral conditions. In Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg, the same assistance as in the Unilateral conditions was provided to both legs such that the bilateral sum was the double of that of the Unilateral conditions. In the Powered-Off condition, no assistance was provided. We measured metabolic energy consumption, exoskeleton mechanics and kinematics. Results: On average, the Unilateral, Bilateral Matched Total Work and Bilateral Matched Work Per Leg conditions reduced the metabolic rate by 7, 11 and 15%, respectively, compared with the Powered-Off condition. A possible explanation for why the Unilateral conditions effectively reduced the metabolic rate could be that they caused only very little asymmetry in gait biomechanics, except at the ankle and in the horizontal center-of-mass velocity. We found the highest ratio of metabolic rate reduction versus positive work assistance with bilateral assistance and low work per leg (Bilateral Matched Total Work). Statistical analysis indicated that assistance symmetry and assistance per leg are more important than the bilateral summed assistance for reducing the metabolic rate of walking. Conclusions: These data bridge the gap between conclusions from studies with unilateral and bilateral exoskeletons and inform how unilateral assistance can be used to influence gait parameters, such as center-of-mass velocity.

KW - Ankle

KW - Asymmetry

KW - Bilateral

KW - Exoskeleton

KW - Magnitude

KW - Metabolic

KW - Symmetry

KW - Unilateral

KW - Walking

KW - Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051251866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051251866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12984-018-0381-z

DO - 10.1186/s12984-018-0381-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 30092800

AN - SCOPUS:85051251866

VL - 15

JO - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

SN - 1743-0003

IS - 1

M1 - 74

ER -