Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards

Devin C. Lonergan, Ginamarie M. Scott, Michael D. Mumford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-246
Number of pages16
JournalCreativity Research Journal
Volume16
Issue number2-3
StatePublished - Oct 27 2004

Fingerprint

Efficiency
Thought
Research
Evaluation
Advertising Campaign
Undergraduate
Generative
Creative Problem Solving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evaluative aspects of creative thought : Effects of appraisal and revision standards. / Lonergan, Devin C.; Scott, Ginamarie M.; Mumford, Michael D.

In: Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2-3, 27.10.2004, p. 231-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50f53fe84b9d43c7bdad3a7d2bba63ad,
title = "Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards",
abstract = "Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.",
author = "Lonergan, {Devin C.} and Scott, {Ginamarie M.} and Mumford, {Michael D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "27",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "231--246",
journal = "Creativity Research Journal",
issn = "1040-0419",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluative aspects of creative thought

T2 - Effects of appraisal and revision standards

AU - Lonergan, Devin C.

AU - Scott, Ginamarie M.

AU - Mumford, Michael D.

PY - 2004/10/27

Y1 - 2004/10/27

N2 - Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.

AB - Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5644240013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5644240013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:5644240013

VL - 16

SP - 231

EP - 246

JO - Creativity Research Journal

JF - Creativity Research Journal

SN - 1040-0419

IS - 2-3

ER -