Evaluation of the functional movement screen and a novel basketball mobility test as an injury prediction tool for collegiate basketball players

Colin W. Bond, Jason C. Dorman, Tryg O. Odney, Scott J. Roggenbuck, Steven W. Young, Thayne A. Munce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identifying injury risk and implementing preventive measures can assist in reducing injury occurrence and may ultimately improve athletic performance. Improper movement patterns often contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. The validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as an injury prediction tool for athletes remains unclear. We designed the Basketball-Specific Mobility Test (BMT) to represent the neuromuscular demands of basketball and identify deficiencies that may be indicative of greater MSK injury risk while playing this sport. The aim of this study was to examine the association of FMS and BMT scores with injury occurrence in collegiate basketball players. We hypothesized that the BMT would be a better predictor of injury risk than the FMS, and that scores from both tests would have a higher association with severe MSK injuries than minor, non-MSK injuries. One-hundred nineteen male and female collegiate basketball players from 4 Upper Midwest universities were assessed preseason (PRE) and postseason (POST) using the FMS and BMT. In-season injury records were collected from the schools’ athletic trainers and were classified by type and severity. During the season, 56 of 119 players were injured, resulting in 96 total injuries. Injured athletes’ PRE FMS scores demonstrated negligible effects compared with uninjured athletes’ PRE scores (d, 0.20), whereas some BMT scores showed potentially meaningful effects (d . 0.20). Although specificity of the FMS and BMT to predict injury was relatively high (FMS 85.7–87.6; BMT 42.0–88.0), sensitivity (FMS 14.2–22.7; BMT 11.6–39.1), odds ratios (FMS 1.00–2.08; BMT 0.47–1.06), and injury prediction capacities (area under the curve; FMS 0.43–0.49; BMT 0.49–0.59) of the tests were low. Although the FMS and BMT may be suitable for identifying MSK deficiencies, they do not accurately determine injury risk in collegiate basketball players. Injury risk assessments may be improved by targeting specific injury mechanisms and the conditions in which they occur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1589-1600
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Basketball
Wounds and Injuries
Athletes
Sports
Athletic Performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Evaluation of the functional movement screen and a novel basketball mobility test as an injury prediction tool for collegiate basketball players. / Bond, Colin W.; Dorman, Jason C.; Odney, Tryg O.; Roggenbuck, Scott J.; Young, Steven W.; Munce, Thayne A.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 33, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1589-1600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bond, Colin W. ; Dorman, Jason C. ; Odney, Tryg O. ; Roggenbuck, Scott J. ; Young, Steven W. ; Munce, Thayne A. / Evaluation of the functional movement screen and a novel basketball mobility test as an injury prediction tool for collegiate basketball players. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 1589-1600.
@article{9c687ef0bd164374afa872dac06ab300,
title = "Evaluation of the functional movement screen and a novel basketball mobility test as an injury prediction tool for collegiate basketball players",
abstract = "Identifying injury risk and implementing preventive measures can assist in reducing injury occurrence and may ultimately improve athletic performance. Improper movement patterns often contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. The validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as an injury prediction tool for athletes remains unclear. We designed the Basketball-Specific Mobility Test (BMT) to represent the neuromuscular demands of basketball and identify deficiencies that may be indicative of greater MSK injury risk while playing this sport. The aim of this study was to examine the association of FMS and BMT scores with injury occurrence in collegiate basketball players. We hypothesized that the BMT would be a better predictor of injury risk than the FMS, and that scores from both tests would have a higher association with severe MSK injuries than minor, non-MSK injuries. One-hundred nineteen male and female collegiate basketball players from 4 Upper Midwest universities were assessed preseason (PRE) and postseason (POST) using the FMS and BMT. In-season injury records were collected from the schools’ athletic trainers and were classified by type and severity. During the season, 56 of 119 players were injured, resulting in 96 total injuries. Injured athletes’ PRE FMS scores demonstrated negligible effects compared with uninjured athletes’ PRE scores (d, 0.20), whereas some BMT scores showed potentially meaningful effects (d . 0.20). Although specificity of the FMS and BMT to predict injury was relatively high (FMS 85.7–87.6; BMT 42.0–88.0), sensitivity (FMS 14.2–22.7; BMT 11.6–39.1), odds ratios (FMS 1.00–2.08; BMT 0.47–1.06), and injury prediction capacities (area under the curve; FMS 0.43–0.49; BMT 0.49–0.59) of the tests were low. Although the FMS and BMT may be suitable for identifying MSK deficiencies, they do not accurately determine injury risk in collegiate basketball players. Injury risk assessments may be improved by targeting specific injury mechanisms and the conditions in which they occur.",
author = "Bond, {Colin W.} and Dorman, {Jason C.} and Odney, {Tryg O.} and Roggenbuck, {Scott J.} and Young, {Steven W.} and Munce, {Thayne A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000001944",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1589--1600",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the functional movement screen and a novel basketball mobility test as an injury prediction tool for collegiate basketball players

AU - Bond, Colin W.

AU - Dorman, Jason C.

AU - Odney, Tryg O.

AU - Roggenbuck, Scott J.

AU - Young, Steven W.

AU - Munce, Thayne A.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Identifying injury risk and implementing preventive measures can assist in reducing injury occurrence and may ultimately improve athletic performance. Improper movement patterns often contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. The validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as an injury prediction tool for athletes remains unclear. We designed the Basketball-Specific Mobility Test (BMT) to represent the neuromuscular demands of basketball and identify deficiencies that may be indicative of greater MSK injury risk while playing this sport. The aim of this study was to examine the association of FMS and BMT scores with injury occurrence in collegiate basketball players. We hypothesized that the BMT would be a better predictor of injury risk than the FMS, and that scores from both tests would have a higher association with severe MSK injuries than minor, non-MSK injuries. One-hundred nineteen male and female collegiate basketball players from 4 Upper Midwest universities were assessed preseason (PRE) and postseason (POST) using the FMS and BMT. In-season injury records were collected from the schools’ athletic trainers and were classified by type and severity. During the season, 56 of 119 players were injured, resulting in 96 total injuries. Injured athletes’ PRE FMS scores demonstrated negligible effects compared with uninjured athletes’ PRE scores (d, 0.20), whereas some BMT scores showed potentially meaningful effects (d . 0.20). Although specificity of the FMS and BMT to predict injury was relatively high (FMS 85.7–87.6; BMT 42.0–88.0), sensitivity (FMS 14.2–22.7; BMT 11.6–39.1), odds ratios (FMS 1.00–2.08; BMT 0.47–1.06), and injury prediction capacities (area under the curve; FMS 0.43–0.49; BMT 0.49–0.59) of the tests were low. Although the FMS and BMT may be suitable for identifying MSK deficiencies, they do not accurately determine injury risk in collegiate basketball players. Injury risk assessments may be improved by targeting specific injury mechanisms and the conditions in which they occur.

AB - Identifying injury risk and implementing preventive measures can assist in reducing injury occurrence and may ultimately improve athletic performance. Improper movement patterns often contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. The validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as an injury prediction tool for athletes remains unclear. We designed the Basketball-Specific Mobility Test (BMT) to represent the neuromuscular demands of basketball and identify deficiencies that may be indicative of greater MSK injury risk while playing this sport. The aim of this study was to examine the association of FMS and BMT scores with injury occurrence in collegiate basketball players. We hypothesized that the BMT would be a better predictor of injury risk than the FMS, and that scores from both tests would have a higher association with severe MSK injuries than minor, non-MSK injuries. One-hundred nineteen male and female collegiate basketball players from 4 Upper Midwest universities were assessed preseason (PRE) and postseason (POST) using the FMS and BMT. In-season injury records were collected from the schools’ athletic trainers and were classified by type and severity. During the season, 56 of 119 players were injured, resulting in 96 total injuries. Injured athletes’ PRE FMS scores demonstrated negligible effects compared with uninjured athletes’ PRE scores (d, 0.20), whereas some BMT scores showed potentially meaningful effects (d . 0.20). Although specificity of the FMS and BMT to predict injury was relatively high (FMS 85.7–87.6; BMT 42.0–88.0), sensitivity (FMS 14.2–22.7; BMT 11.6–39.1), odds ratios (FMS 1.00–2.08; BMT 0.47–1.06), and injury prediction capacities (area under the curve; FMS 0.43–0.49; BMT 0.49–0.59) of the tests were low. Although the FMS and BMT may be suitable for identifying MSK deficiencies, they do not accurately determine injury risk in collegiate basketball players. Injury risk assessments may be improved by targeting specific injury mechanisms and the conditions in which they occur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048112832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048112832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001944

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001944

M3 - Article

C2 - 28426513

AN - SCOPUS:85048112832

VL - 33

SP - 1589

EP - 1600

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 6

ER -