Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators

Michael S. Bergman, Dennis J. Viscusi, Brian K. Heimbuch, Joseph D. Wander, Anthony R. Sambol, Ronald E. Shaffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disposable N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) are widely used by healthcare workers to reduce exposures to infectious biological aerosols. There is currently major concern among public health officials about a possible shortage of N95 FFRs during an influenza pandemic. Decontamination and reuse of FFRs is a possible strategy for extending FFR supplies in an emergency; however, the NIOSH respirator certification process does not currently include provisions for decontamination and reuse. Recent studies have investigated the laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance) and physical integrity of FFRs following one-cycle (1X) processing of various decontamination treatments. The studies found that a single application of some methods did not adversely affect laboratory performance. In the event that healthcare facilities experience dramatic shortages of FFR supplies, multiple decontamination processing may become necessary. This study investigates three-cycle (3X) processing of eight different methods: ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, hydrogen peroxide vapor, microwave-oven-generated steam, bleach, liquid hydrogen peroxide, and moist heat incubation (pasteurization). A four-hour 3X submersion of FFR in deionized water was performed for comparison (control). Following 3X treatment by each decontamination and control method, FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory filtration performance. Only the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma treatment resulted in mean penetration levels > 5% for four of the six FFR models; FFRs treated by the seven other methods and the control samples had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration (< 5%) and filter airflow resistance. Physical damage varied by treatment method. Further research is still needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-41
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Volume5
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 10 2010

Fingerprint

Respirators
Decontamination
Processing
Hydrogen peroxide
Hydrogen Peroxide
Aerosols
Plasma Gases
Health
Pasteurization
Plasmas
Microwave ovens
Ethylene Oxide
Deionized water
Steam
Odors
Public health
Gases
Ethylene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Bergman, M. S., Viscusi, D. J., Heimbuch, B. K., Wander, J. D., Sambol, A. R., & Shaffer, R. E. (2010). Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 5(4), 33-41.

Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators. / Bergman, Michael S.; Viscusi, Dennis J.; Heimbuch, Brian K.; Wander, Joseph D.; Sambol, Anthony R.; Shaffer, Ronald E.

In: Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 10.12.2010, p. 33-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bergman, MS, Viscusi, DJ, Heimbuch, BK, Wander, JD, Sambol, AR & Shaffer, RE 2010, 'Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators', Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 33-41.
Bergman, Michael S. ; Viscusi, Dennis J. ; Heimbuch, Brian K. ; Wander, Joseph D. ; Sambol, Anthony R. ; Shaffer, Ronald E. / Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators. In: Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 33-41.
@article{71e191eb7aa04abebcd5b57b980847d1,
title = "Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators",
abstract = "Disposable N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) are widely used by healthcare workers to reduce exposures to infectious biological aerosols. There is currently major concern among public health officials about a possible shortage of N95 FFRs during an influenza pandemic. Decontamination and reuse of FFRs is a possible strategy for extending FFR supplies in an emergency; however, the NIOSH respirator certification process does not currently include provisions for decontamination and reuse. Recent studies have investigated the laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance) and physical integrity of FFRs following one-cycle (1X) processing of various decontamination treatments. The studies found that a single application of some methods did not adversely affect laboratory performance. In the event that healthcare facilities experience dramatic shortages of FFR supplies, multiple decontamination processing may become necessary. This study investigates three-cycle (3X) processing of eight different methods: ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, hydrogen peroxide vapor, microwave-oven-generated steam, bleach, liquid hydrogen peroxide, and moist heat incubation (pasteurization). A four-hour 3X submersion of FFR in deionized water was performed for comparison (control). Following 3X treatment by each decontamination and control method, FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory filtration performance. Only the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma treatment resulted in mean penetration levels > 5{\%} for four of the six FFR models; FFRs treated by the seven other methods and the control samples had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration (< 5{\%}) and filter airflow resistance. Physical damage varied by treatment method. Further research is still needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.",
author = "Bergman, {Michael S.} and Viscusi, {Dennis J.} and Heimbuch, {Brian K.} and Wander, {Joseph D.} and Sambol, {Anthony R.} and Shaffer, {Ronald E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "33--41",
journal = "Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics",
issn = "1558-9250",
publisher = "Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators

AU - Bergman, Michael S.

AU - Viscusi, Dennis J.

AU - Heimbuch, Brian K.

AU - Wander, Joseph D.

AU - Sambol, Anthony R.

AU - Shaffer, Ronald E.

PY - 2010/12/10

Y1 - 2010/12/10

N2 - Disposable N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) are widely used by healthcare workers to reduce exposures to infectious biological aerosols. There is currently major concern among public health officials about a possible shortage of N95 FFRs during an influenza pandemic. Decontamination and reuse of FFRs is a possible strategy for extending FFR supplies in an emergency; however, the NIOSH respirator certification process does not currently include provisions for decontamination and reuse. Recent studies have investigated the laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance) and physical integrity of FFRs following one-cycle (1X) processing of various decontamination treatments. The studies found that a single application of some methods did not adversely affect laboratory performance. In the event that healthcare facilities experience dramatic shortages of FFR supplies, multiple decontamination processing may become necessary. This study investigates three-cycle (3X) processing of eight different methods: ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, hydrogen peroxide vapor, microwave-oven-generated steam, bleach, liquid hydrogen peroxide, and moist heat incubation (pasteurization). A four-hour 3X submersion of FFR in deionized water was performed for comparison (control). Following 3X treatment by each decontamination and control method, FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory filtration performance. Only the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma treatment resulted in mean penetration levels > 5% for four of the six FFR models; FFRs treated by the seven other methods and the control samples had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration (< 5%) and filter airflow resistance. Physical damage varied by treatment method. Further research is still needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.

AB - Disposable N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) are widely used by healthcare workers to reduce exposures to infectious biological aerosols. There is currently major concern among public health officials about a possible shortage of N95 FFRs during an influenza pandemic. Decontamination and reuse of FFRs is a possible strategy for extending FFR supplies in an emergency; however, the NIOSH respirator certification process does not currently include provisions for decontamination and reuse. Recent studies have investigated the laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance) and physical integrity of FFRs following one-cycle (1X) processing of various decontamination treatments. The studies found that a single application of some methods did not adversely affect laboratory performance. In the event that healthcare facilities experience dramatic shortages of FFR supplies, multiple decontamination processing may become necessary. This study investigates three-cycle (3X) processing of eight different methods: ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, hydrogen peroxide vapor, microwave-oven-generated steam, bleach, liquid hydrogen peroxide, and moist heat incubation (pasteurization). A four-hour 3X submersion of FFR in deionized water was performed for comparison (control). Following 3X treatment by each decontamination and control method, FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory filtration performance. Only the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma treatment resulted in mean penetration levels > 5% for four of the six FFR models; FFRs treated by the seven other methods and the control samples had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration (< 5%) and filter airflow resistance. Physical damage varied by treatment method. Further research is still needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649764119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649764119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649764119

VL - 5

SP - 33

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics

JF - Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics

SN - 1558-9250

IS - 4

ER -