Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river

Cheng Cheng, Xun-Hong Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Field and laboratory methods have been used to determine the hydraulic properties in a multiple-layer aquifer - aquitard system that is hydrologically connected to a river. First, hypothetical pumping tests in aquifer-aquitard systems were performed to evaluate the feasibility of MODFLOW-PEST in determining these parameters. Sensitivity analyses showed that: the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer has the highest composite sensitivity; the vertical hydraulic conductivity has higher composite sensitivity than the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquitard; and a partial penetration pumping well in an aquifer layer can improve the quality of the estimated parameters. This inverse approach was then used to analyze a pumping-recovery test conducted near the Platte River in southeastern Nebraska, USA. The hydraulic conductivities and specific yield were calculated for the aquitard and aquifer. The direct-push technique was used to generate sediment columns; permeameter tests on these columns produced the vertical hydraulic conductivities that are compatible with those obtained from the pumping-recovery test. Thus, the combination of the direct-push technique with permeameter tests provides a new method for estimation of vertical hydraulic conductivity. The hydraulic conductivity, determined from grain-size analysis, is smaller than the horizontal one but larger than the vertical one determined by the pumping-recovery test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-678
Number of pages10
JournalHydrogeology Journal
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

aquitard
hydraulic property
hydraulic conductivity
aquifer
pumping
river
permeameter
laboratory method
field method
method
evaluation
test
penetration
grain size
well
sediment

Keywords

  • Aquifer-aquitard
  • Direct-push technique
  • Hydraulic properties
  • Inverse modeling
  • Permeameter test
  • Pumping test
  • Vertical hydraulic conductivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river. / Cheng, Cheng; Chen, Xun-Hong.

In: Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.06.2007, p. 669-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97b58df41c3f414b85463e0f4c4483e4,
title = "Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river",
abstract = "Field and laboratory methods have been used to determine the hydraulic properties in a multiple-layer aquifer - aquitard system that is hydrologically connected to a river. First, hypothetical pumping tests in aquifer-aquitard systems were performed to evaluate the feasibility of MODFLOW-PEST in determining these parameters. Sensitivity analyses showed that: the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer has the highest composite sensitivity; the vertical hydraulic conductivity has higher composite sensitivity than the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquitard; and a partial penetration pumping well in an aquifer layer can improve the quality of the estimated parameters. This inverse approach was then used to analyze a pumping-recovery test conducted near the Platte River in southeastern Nebraska, USA. The hydraulic conductivities and specific yield were calculated for the aquitard and aquifer. The direct-push technique was used to generate sediment columns; permeameter tests on these columns produced the vertical hydraulic conductivities that are compatible with those obtained from the pumping-recovery test. Thus, the combination of the direct-push technique with permeameter tests provides a new method for estimation of vertical hydraulic conductivity. The hydraulic conductivity, determined from grain-size analysis, is smaller than the horizontal one but larger than the vertical one determined by the pumping-recovery test.",
keywords = "Aquifer-aquitard, Direct-push technique, Hydraulic properties, Inverse modeling, Permeameter test, Pumping test, Vertical hydraulic conductivity",
author = "Cheng Cheng and Xun-Hong Chen",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10040-006-0135-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "669--678",
journal = "Hydrogeology Journal",
issn = "1431-2174",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river

AU - Cheng, Cheng

AU - Chen, Xun-Hong

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Field and laboratory methods have been used to determine the hydraulic properties in a multiple-layer aquifer - aquitard system that is hydrologically connected to a river. First, hypothetical pumping tests in aquifer-aquitard systems were performed to evaluate the feasibility of MODFLOW-PEST in determining these parameters. Sensitivity analyses showed that: the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer has the highest composite sensitivity; the vertical hydraulic conductivity has higher composite sensitivity than the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquitard; and a partial penetration pumping well in an aquifer layer can improve the quality of the estimated parameters. This inverse approach was then used to analyze a pumping-recovery test conducted near the Platte River in southeastern Nebraska, USA. The hydraulic conductivities and specific yield were calculated for the aquitard and aquifer. The direct-push technique was used to generate sediment columns; permeameter tests on these columns produced the vertical hydraulic conductivities that are compatible with those obtained from the pumping-recovery test. Thus, the combination of the direct-push technique with permeameter tests provides a new method for estimation of vertical hydraulic conductivity. The hydraulic conductivity, determined from grain-size analysis, is smaller than the horizontal one but larger than the vertical one determined by the pumping-recovery test.

AB - Field and laboratory methods have been used to determine the hydraulic properties in a multiple-layer aquifer - aquitard system that is hydrologically connected to a river. First, hypothetical pumping tests in aquifer-aquitard systems were performed to evaluate the feasibility of MODFLOW-PEST in determining these parameters. Sensitivity analyses showed that: the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer has the highest composite sensitivity; the vertical hydraulic conductivity has higher composite sensitivity than the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquitard; and a partial penetration pumping well in an aquifer layer can improve the quality of the estimated parameters. This inverse approach was then used to analyze a pumping-recovery test conducted near the Platte River in southeastern Nebraska, USA. The hydraulic conductivities and specific yield were calculated for the aquitard and aquifer. The direct-push technique was used to generate sediment columns; permeameter tests on these columns produced the vertical hydraulic conductivities that are compatible with those obtained from the pumping-recovery test. Thus, the combination of the direct-push technique with permeameter tests provides a new method for estimation of vertical hydraulic conductivity. The hydraulic conductivity, determined from grain-size analysis, is smaller than the horizontal one but larger than the vertical one determined by the pumping-recovery test.

KW - Aquifer-aquitard

KW - Direct-push technique

KW - Hydraulic properties

KW - Inverse modeling

KW - Permeameter test

KW - Pumping test

KW - Vertical hydraulic conductivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249985268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249985268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10040-006-0135-z

DO - 10.1007/s10040-006-0135-z

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 669

EP - 678

JO - Hydrogeology Journal

JF - Hydrogeology Journal

SN - 1431-2174

IS - 4

ER -