Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia

Londa Vanderwal, Risto Rautiainen, Rex Kuye, Corinne Peek-Asa, Thomas Cook, Marizen Ramirez, Kennith Culp, Kelley Donham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated land preparation interventions (new short- and long-handled hoes), developed in a participatory manner with women vegetable farmers in West Africa, and identified indicators of long-term adoption of these interventions. Methods: Subjects (n = 48) engaged in timed trials, alternating between using an intervention tool and their traditional hand hoe to till specified plots of land. Heart rates were measured and subjects reported the relative ergonomic comfort and safeness of the tool after each trial. Follow-up interviews and focus groups were held one, two, and three months after the trials. Results: Compared to the traditional hoe, the new long-handled hoe required 22% less time (p = 0.01), while the new short hoe took 20% more time (p = 0.05) to till the standard plots in this study. Two months after the initial trials, 94% of subjects preferred the new hoes over the traditional hoe. Most subjects (75%) preferred the new short hoe over the new long hoe and thought it was faster (81%), despite measurements to the contrary. Conclusions: While the new long-handled hoe performed better in the timed trials in this study, most subjects preferred the new short-handled hoe. Subjects should be sensitized on the benefits of the long-handled hoe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)749-756
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Gambia
Vegetables
vegetables
farmer
Hand
Western Africa
Human Engineering
Ergonomics
Focus Groups
evaluation
Heart Rate
Interviews
West Africa
ergonomics
Farmers
interview

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Agriculture
  • Hand tools
  • Safety
  • Vegetable farming
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia. / Vanderwal, Londa; Rautiainen, Risto; Kuye, Rex; Peek-Asa, Corinne; Cook, Thomas; Ramirez, Marizen; Culp, Kennith; Donham, Kelley.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 42, No. 5, 07.2011, p. 749-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vanderwal, Londa ; Rautiainen, Risto ; Kuye, Rex ; Peek-Asa, Corinne ; Cook, Thomas ; Ramirez, Marizen ; Culp, Kennith ; Donham, Kelley. / Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2011 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 749-756.
@article{6db29693d2f040779008716eb53a2986,
title = "Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia",
abstract = "Objective: This study evaluated land preparation interventions (new short- and long-handled hoes), developed in a participatory manner with women vegetable farmers in West Africa, and identified indicators of long-term adoption of these interventions. Methods: Subjects (n = 48) engaged in timed trials, alternating between using an intervention tool and their traditional hand hoe to till specified plots of land. Heart rates were measured and subjects reported the relative ergonomic comfort and safeness of the tool after each trial. Follow-up interviews and focus groups were held one, two, and three months after the trials. Results: Compared to the traditional hoe, the new long-handled hoe required 22{\%} less time (p = 0.01), while the new short hoe took 20{\%} more time (p = 0.05) to till the standard plots in this study. Two months after the initial trials, 94{\%} of subjects preferred the new hoes over the traditional hoe. Most subjects (75{\%}) preferred the new short hoe over the new long hoe and thought it was faster (81{\%}), despite measurements to the contrary. Conclusions: While the new long-handled hoe performed better in the timed trials in this study, most subjects preferred the new short-handled hoe. Subjects should be sensitized on the benefits of the long-handled hoe.",
keywords = "Africa, Agriculture, Hand tools, Safety, Vegetable farming, Women",
author = "Londa Vanderwal and Risto Rautiainen and Rex Kuye and Corinne Peek-Asa and Thomas Cook and Marizen Ramirez and Kennith Culp and Kelley Donham",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "749--756",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia

AU - Vanderwal, Londa

AU - Rautiainen, Risto

AU - Kuye, Rex

AU - Peek-Asa, Corinne

AU - Cook, Thomas

AU - Ramirez, Marizen

AU - Culp, Kennith

AU - Donham, Kelley

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Objective: This study evaluated land preparation interventions (new short- and long-handled hoes), developed in a participatory manner with women vegetable farmers in West Africa, and identified indicators of long-term adoption of these interventions. Methods: Subjects (n = 48) engaged in timed trials, alternating between using an intervention tool and their traditional hand hoe to till specified plots of land. Heart rates were measured and subjects reported the relative ergonomic comfort and safeness of the tool after each trial. Follow-up interviews and focus groups were held one, two, and three months after the trials. Results: Compared to the traditional hoe, the new long-handled hoe required 22% less time (p = 0.01), while the new short hoe took 20% more time (p = 0.05) to till the standard plots in this study. Two months after the initial trials, 94% of subjects preferred the new hoes over the traditional hoe. Most subjects (75%) preferred the new short hoe over the new long hoe and thought it was faster (81%), despite measurements to the contrary. Conclusions: While the new long-handled hoe performed better in the timed trials in this study, most subjects preferred the new short-handled hoe. Subjects should be sensitized on the benefits of the long-handled hoe.

AB - Objective: This study evaluated land preparation interventions (new short- and long-handled hoes), developed in a participatory manner with women vegetable farmers in West Africa, and identified indicators of long-term adoption of these interventions. Methods: Subjects (n = 48) engaged in timed trials, alternating between using an intervention tool and their traditional hand hoe to till specified plots of land. Heart rates were measured and subjects reported the relative ergonomic comfort and safeness of the tool after each trial. Follow-up interviews and focus groups were held one, two, and three months after the trials. Results: Compared to the traditional hoe, the new long-handled hoe required 22% less time (p = 0.01), while the new short hoe took 20% more time (p = 0.05) to till the standard plots in this study. Two months after the initial trials, 94% of subjects preferred the new hoes over the traditional hoe. Most subjects (75%) preferred the new short hoe over the new long hoe and thought it was faster (81%), despite measurements to the contrary. Conclusions: While the new long-handled hoe performed better in the timed trials in this study, most subjects preferred the new short-handled hoe. Subjects should be sensitized on the benefits of the long-handled hoe.

KW - Africa

KW - Agriculture

KW - Hand tools

KW - Safety

KW - Vegetable farming

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953709994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953709994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21236415

AN - SCOPUS:79953709994

VL - 42

SP - 749

EP - 756

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 5

ER -