Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task

Ram R. Bishu, Ro Hae Myung, Joseph M. Deeb

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)692-696
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors Society
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990
EventProceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90 - Orlando, FL, USA
Duration: Oct 8 1990Oct 12 1990

Fingerprint

Durability
Containers
Polynomials
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. / Bishu, Ram R.; Myung, Ro Hae; Deeb, Joseph M.

In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 01.01.1990, p. 692-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{63806932abf74cc5a216bf7efd2c2bc0,
title = "Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task",
abstract = "Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25{\%}, 50{\%}, 75{\%}, and 100{\%} of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.",
author = "Bishu, {Ram R.} and Myung, {Ro Hae} and Deeb, {Joseph M.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/154193129003401006",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "692--696",
journal = "Proceedings of the Human Factors Society",
issn = "0163-5182",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task

AU - Bishu, Ram R.

AU - Myung, Ro Hae

AU - Deeb, Joseph M.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

AB - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/154193129003401006

DO - 10.1177/154193129003401006

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0025551878

SP - 692

EP - 696

JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society

JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society

SN - 0163-5182

ER -