Evaluation of handle position - Comparison of psychophysical force/endurance and biomechanical criteria

Ram R. Bishu, Wang Wei

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Handle locations and geometry play an important role in container design. The objective of this study was threefold: (a) to determine the effectiveness of the handles in a lifting and carrying task, (b) to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions, and (c) to compare the handle positions through biomechanical modelling. The first two objectives were evaluated through a pair of laboratory experiments, while the University of Michigan 'Two-dimensional static biomechanical model' was modified for the third objective. The results indicate that symmetric handle positions 2/2, and 8/8 are the best. Among the asymmetric handle positions 3/7 appeared to be superior to 6/8, although the latter resulted in the longest endurance. The results are discussed in light of recommendations to the designer of container.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-234
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1992

Fingerprint

endurance
Containers
Durability
laboratory experiment
evaluation
mathematics
Geometry
Experiments

Keywords

  • MMH injuries
  • box handles
  • container design
  • lifting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Evaluation of handle position - Comparison of psychophysical force/endurance and biomechanical criteria. / Bishu, Ram R.; Wei, Wang.

In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 05.1992, p. 221-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{57b6788e618f4b889fdff3e05949149d,
title = "Evaluation of handle position - Comparison of psychophysical force/endurance and biomechanical criteria",
abstract = "Handle locations and geometry play an important role in container design. The objective of this study was threefold: (a) to determine the effectiveness of the handles in a lifting and carrying task, (b) to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions, and (c) to compare the handle positions through biomechanical modelling. The first two objectives were evaluated through a pair of laboratory experiments, while the University of Michigan 'Two-dimensional static biomechanical model' was modified for the third objective. The results indicate that symmetric handle positions 2/2, and 8/8 are the best. Among the asymmetric handle positions 3/7 appeared to be superior to 6/8, although the latter resulted in the longest endurance. The results are discussed in light of recommendations to the designer of container.",
keywords = "MMH injuries, box handles, container design, lifting",
author = "Bishu, {Ram R.} and Wang Wei",
year = "1992",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/0169-8141(92)90016-S",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "221--234",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",
issn = "0169-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of handle position - Comparison of psychophysical force/endurance and biomechanical criteria

AU - Bishu, Ram R.

AU - Wei, Wang

PY - 1992/5

Y1 - 1992/5

N2 - Handle locations and geometry play an important role in container design. The objective of this study was threefold: (a) to determine the effectiveness of the handles in a lifting and carrying task, (b) to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions, and (c) to compare the handle positions through biomechanical modelling. The first two objectives were evaluated through a pair of laboratory experiments, while the University of Michigan 'Two-dimensional static biomechanical model' was modified for the third objective. The results indicate that symmetric handle positions 2/2, and 8/8 are the best. Among the asymmetric handle positions 3/7 appeared to be superior to 6/8, although the latter resulted in the longest endurance. The results are discussed in light of recommendations to the designer of container.

AB - Handle locations and geometry play an important role in container design. The objective of this study was threefold: (a) to determine the effectiveness of the handles in a lifting and carrying task, (b) to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions, and (c) to compare the handle positions through biomechanical modelling. The first two objectives were evaluated through a pair of laboratory experiments, while the University of Michigan 'Two-dimensional static biomechanical model' was modified for the third objective. The results indicate that symmetric handle positions 2/2, and 8/8 are the best. Among the asymmetric handle positions 3/7 appeared to be superior to 6/8, although the latter resulted in the longest endurance. The results are discussed in light of recommendations to the designer of container.

KW - MMH injuries

KW - box handles

KW - container design

KW - lifting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026868289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026868289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90016-S

DO - 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90016-S

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026868289

VL - 9

SP - 221

EP - 234

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

SN - 0169-8141

IS - 3

ER -