Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages

Gregory P. Hanley, Cathleen C. Piazza, Wayne W. Fisher, Stephanie A. Contrucci, Kristen A. Maglieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional communication training (FCT) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) are commonly prescribed treatments that are based on the results of a functional analysis. Both treatments involve delivery of the reinforcer that is responsible for the maintenance of destructive behavior. One major difference between the two treatment procedures is that client responding determines reinforcement delivery with FCT (e.g., reinforcement of communication is delivered on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule) but not with NCR (e.g., reinforcement is delivered on a fixed-time 30-s schedule). In the current investigation, FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing 2 participants' destructive behavior that was sensitive to attention as reinforcement. After the treatment analysis, the participants' relative preference for each treatment was evaluated using a modified concurrent-chains procedure. Both participants demonstrated a preference for the FCT procedure. The results are discussed in terms of treatment efficacy and preference for control over when reinforcement is delivered. In addition, a method is demonstrated in which clients with developmental disabilities can participate in selecting treatments that are designed to reduce their destructive behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)459-473
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

reinforcement
evaluation
Communication
communication
Therapeutics
Appointments and Schedules
functional analysis
Developmental Disabilities
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Evaluation
Reinforcement
disability
Maintenance
Communication Training
Functional Communication

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Concurrent operants
  • Concurrent-chains procedure
  • Developmental disabilities
  • Functional communication training
  • Noncontingent reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. / Hanley, Gregory P.; Piazza, Cathleen C.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Contrucci, Stephanie A.; Maglieri, Kristen A.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 459-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hanley, Gregory P. ; Piazza, Cathleen C. ; Fisher, Wayne W. ; Contrucci, Stephanie A. ; Maglieri, Kristen A. / Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 1997 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 459-473.
@article{99a290c244a3497ea9b80a4d56d5f702,
title = "Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages",
abstract = "Functional communication training (FCT) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) are commonly prescribed treatments that are based on the results of a functional analysis. Both treatments involve delivery of the reinforcer that is responsible for the maintenance of destructive behavior. One major difference between the two treatment procedures is that client responding determines reinforcement delivery with FCT (e.g., reinforcement of communication is delivered on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule) but not with NCR (e.g., reinforcement is delivered on a fixed-time 30-s schedule). In the current investigation, FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing 2 participants' destructive behavior that was sensitive to attention as reinforcement. After the treatment analysis, the participants' relative preference for each treatment was evaluated using a modified concurrent-chains procedure. Both participants demonstrated a preference for the FCT procedure. The results are discussed in terms of treatment efficacy and preference for control over when reinforcement is delivered. In addition, a method is demonstrated in which clients with developmental disabilities can participate in selecting treatments that are designed to reduce their destructive behavior.",
keywords = "Choice, Concurrent operants, Concurrent-chains procedure, Developmental disabilities, Functional communication training, Noncontingent reinforcement",
author = "Hanley, {Gregory P.} and Piazza, {Cathleen C.} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Contrucci, {Stephanie A.} and Maglieri, {Kristen A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "459--473",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages

AU - Hanley, Gregory P.

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Contrucci, Stephanie A.

AU - Maglieri, Kristen A.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Functional communication training (FCT) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) are commonly prescribed treatments that are based on the results of a functional analysis. Both treatments involve delivery of the reinforcer that is responsible for the maintenance of destructive behavior. One major difference between the two treatment procedures is that client responding determines reinforcement delivery with FCT (e.g., reinforcement of communication is delivered on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule) but not with NCR (e.g., reinforcement is delivered on a fixed-time 30-s schedule). In the current investigation, FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing 2 participants' destructive behavior that was sensitive to attention as reinforcement. After the treatment analysis, the participants' relative preference for each treatment was evaluated using a modified concurrent-chains procedure. Both participants demonstrated a preference for the FCT procedure. The results are discussed in terms of treatment efficacy and preference for control over when reinforcement is delivered. In addition, a method is demonstrated in which clients with developmental disabilities can participate in selecting treatments that are designed to reduce their destructive behavior.

AB - Functional communication training (FCT) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) are commonly prescribed treatments that are based on the results of a functional analysis. Both treatments involve delivery of the reinforcer that is responsible for the maintenance of destructive behavior. One major difference between the two treatment procedures is that client responding determines reinforcement delivery with FCT (e.g., reinforcement of communication is delivered on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule) but not with NCR (e.g., reinforcement is delivered on a fixed-time 30-s schedule). In the current investigation, FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing 2 participants' destructive behavior that was sensitive to attention as reinforcement. After the treatment analysis, the participants' relative preference for each treatment was evaluated using a modified concurrent-chains procedure. Both participants demonstrated a preference for the FCT procedure. The results are discussed in terms of treatment efficacy and preference for control over when reinforcement is delivered. In addition, a method is demonstrated in which clients with developmental disabilities can participate in selecting treatments that are designed to reduce their destructive behavior.

KW - Choice

KW - Concurrent operants

KW - Concurrent-chains procedure

KW - Developmental disabilities

KW - Functional communication training

KW - Noncontingent reinforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031227648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031227648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459

M3 - Article

C2 - 9316259

AN - SCOPUS:0031227648

VL - 30

SP - 459

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -