Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams

Ye Angela Hu, Haijun Song, Zhe Chen, Sumin Zhou, Fang Fang Yin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm of the Eclipse treatment planning system is based heavily upon Monte Carlo simulation of the linac head and modeling of the linac beam characteristics with minimal measurement of beam data. Commissioning of the eMC algorithm on multiple identical linacs provided a unique opportunity to systematically evaluate the algorithm with actual measurements of clinically relevant beam and dose parameters. In this study, measured and eMC calculated dose distributions were compared both along and perpendicular to electron beam direction for electron energy/applicator/ depth combination using measurement data from four Varian CLINAC 21EX linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Cutout factors for sizes down to 3 × 3 cm were also compared. Comparisons between the measurement and the eMC calculated values show that the R90, R80, R50, and R10 values mostly agree within 3 mm. Measure and calculated bremsstrahlung dose Dx correlates well statistically although eMC calculated Dx values are consistently smaller than the measured, with maximum discrepancy of 1% for the 20 MeV electron beams. Surface dose agrees mostly within 2%. Field width and penumbra agree mostly within 3 mm. Calculation grid size is found to have a significant effect on the dose calculation. A grid size of 5 mm can produce erroneous dose distributions. Using a grid size of 2.5 mm and a 3% accuracy specified for the eMC to stop calculation iteration, the absolute output agrees with measurements within 3% for field sizes of 5 × 5 cm or larger. For cutout of 3 × 3 cm, however, the output disagreement can reach 8%. Our results indicate that the eMC algorithm in Eclipse provides acceptable agreement with measurement data for most clinical situations. Calculation grid size of 2.5 mm or smaller is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of applied clinical medical physics
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Electron beams
electron beams
Electrons
dosage
evaluation
grids
electrons
eclipses
penumbras
output
Applicators
linear accelerators
Linear accelerators
bremsstrahlung
iteration
planning
Particle Accelerators
electron energy
Planning
Head

Keywords

  • Commissioning
  • Dosimetry
  • Electron Monte Carlo
  • Radiation
  • Verification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams. / Hu, Ye Angela; Song, Haijun; Chen, Zhe; Zhou, Sumin; Yin, Fang Fang.

In: Journal of applied clinical medical physics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hu, Ye Angela ; Song, Haijun ; Chen, Zhe ; Zhou, Sumin ; Yin, Fang Fang. / Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams. In: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 1-15.
@article{ae5c3cf208a34f1396e23dc8d8acb6ef,
title = "Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams",
abstract = "The electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm of the Eclipse treatment planning system is based heavily upon Monte Carlo simulation of the linac head and modeling of the linac beam characteristics with minimal measurement of beam data. Commissioning of the eMC algorithm on multiple identical linacs provided a unique opportunity to systematically evaluate the algorithm with actual measurements of clinically relevant beam and dose parameters. In this study, measured and eMC calculated dose distributions were compared both along and perpendicular to electron beam direction for electron energy/applicator/ depth combination using measurement data from four Varian CLINAC 21EX linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Cutout factors for sizes down to 3 × 3 cm were also compared. Comparisons between the measurement and the eMC calculated values show that the R90, R80, R50, and R10 values mostly agree within 3 mm. Measure and calculated bremsstrahlung dose Dx correlates well statistically although eMC calculated Dx values are consistently smaller than the measured, with maximum discrepancy of 1{\%} for the 20 MeV electron beams. Surface dose agrees mostly within 2{\%}. Field width and penumbra agree mostly within 3 mm. Calculation grid size is found to have a significant effect on the dose calculation. A grid size of 5 mm can produce erroneous dose distributions. Using a grid size of 2.5 mm and a 3{\%} accuracy specified for the eMC to stop calculation iteration, the absolute output agrees with measurements within 3{\%} for field sizes of 5 × 5 cm or larger. For cutout of 3 × 3 cm, however, the output disagreement can reach 8{\%}. Our results indicate that the eMC algorithm in Eclipse provides acceptable agreement with measurement data for most clinical situations. Calculation grid size of 2.5 mm or smaller is recommended.",
keywords = "Commissioning, Dosimetry, Electron Monte Carlo, Radiation, Verification",
author = "Hu, {Ye Angela} and Haijun Song and Zhe Chen and Sumin Zhou and Yin, {Fang Fang}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2720",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams

AU - Hu, Ye Angela

AU - Song, Haijun

AU - Chen, Zhe

AU - Zhou, Sumin

AU - Yin, Fang Fang

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - The electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm of the Eclipse treatment planning system is based heavily upon Monte Carlo simulation of the linac head and modeling of the linac beam characteristics with minimal measurement of beam data. Commissioning of the eMC algorithm on multiple identical linacs provided a unique opportunity to systematically evaluate the algorithm with actual measurements of clinically relevant beam and dose parameters. In this study, measured and eMC calculated dose distributions were compared both along and perpendicular to electron beam direction for electron energy/applicator/ depth combination using measurement data from four Varian CLINAC 21EX linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Cutout factors for sizes down to 3 × 3 cm were also compared. Comparisons between the measurement and the eMC calculated values show that the R90, R80, R50, and R10 values mostly agree within 3 mm. Measure and calculated bremsstrahlung dose Dx correlates well statistically although eMC calculated Dx values are consistently smaller than the measured, with maximum discrepancy of 1% for the 20 MeV electron beams. Surface dose agrees mostly within 2%. Field width and penumbra agree mostly within 3 mm. Calculation grid size is found to have a significant effect on the dose calculation. A grid size of 5 mm can produce erroneous dose distributions. Using a grid size of 2.5 mm and a 3% accuracy specified for the eMC to stop calculation iteration, the absolute output agrees with measurements within 3% for field sizes of 5 × 5 cm or larger. For cutout of 3 × 3 cm, however, the output disagreement can reach 8%. Our results indicate that the eMC algorithm in Eclipse provides acceptable agreement with measurement data for most clinical situations. Calculation grid size of 2.5 mm or smaller is recommended.

AB - The electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm of the Eclipse treatment planning system is based heavily upon Monte Carlo simulation of the linac head and modeling of the linac beam characteristics with minimal measurement of beam data. Commissioning of the eMC algorithm on multiple identical linacs provided a unique opportunity to systematically evaluate the algorithm with actual measurements of clinically relevant beam and dose parameters. In this study, measured and eMC calculated dose distributions were compared both along and perpendicular to electron beam direction for electron energy/applicator/ depth combination using measurement data from four Varian CLINAC 21EX linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Cutout factors for sizes down to 3 × 3 cm were also compared. Comparisons between the measurement and the eMC calculated values show that the R90, R80, R50, and R10 values mostly agree within 3 mm. Measure and calculated bremsstrahlung dose Dx correlates well statistically although eMC calculated Dx values are consistently smaller than the measured, with maximum discrepancy of 1% for the 20 MeV electron beams. Surface dose agrees mostly within 2%. Field width and penumbra agree mostly within 3 mm. Calculation grid size is found to have a significant effect on the dose calculation. A grid size of 5 mm can produce erroneous dose distributions. Using a grid size of 2.5 mm and a 3% accuracy specified for the eMC to stop calculation iteration, the absolute output agrees with measurements within 3% for field sizes of 5 × 5 cm or larger. For cutout of 3 × 3 cm, however, the output disagreement can reach 8%. Our results indicate that the eMC algorithm in Eclipse provides acceptable agreement with measurement data for most clinical situations. Calculation grid size of 2.5 mm or smaller is recommended.

KW - Commissioning

KW - Dosimetry

KW - Electron Monte Carlo

KW - Radiation

KW - Verification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049112601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049112601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2720

DO - 10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2720

M3 - Article

C2 - 18716583

AN - SCOPUS:57049112601

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 3

ER -