Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments

Eileen M. Roscoe, Wayne W Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We used a brief training procedure that incorporated feedback and role-play practice to train staff members to conduct stimulus preference assessments, and we used group-comparison methods to evaluate the effects of training. Staff members were trained to implement the multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment in a single session and the paired-stimulus method in another single session. In all 16 cases (2 assessments for 8 trainees), correct responding increased to over 80% accuracy; in 14 of those 16 cases, it increased to over 90% accuracy. Thus, training produced mastery-level performance in a single training session in almost all cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-254
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

stimulus
staff
evaluation
role play
trainee
Staff
Evaluation
Stimulus
performance
Group

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Staff training
  • Stimulus preference assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments. / Roscoe, Eileen M.; Fisher, Wayne W.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 249-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e81353a4aeeb459d92b60190d5e282b3,
title = "Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments",
abstract = "We used a brief training procedure that incorporated feedback and role-play practice to train staff members to conduct stimulus preference assessments, and we used group-comparison methods to evaluate the effects of training. Staff members were trained to implement the multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment in a single session and the paired-stimulus method in another single session. In all 16 cases (2 assessments for 8 trainees), correct responding increased to over 80{\%} accuracy; in 14 of those 16 cases, it increased to over 90{\%} accuracy. Thus, training produced mastery-level performance in a single training session in almost all cases.",
keywords = "Feedback, Staff training, Stimulus preference assessment",
author = "Roscoe, {Eileen M.} and Fisher, {Wayne W}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2008.41-249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "249--254",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments

AU - Roscoe, Eileen M.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - We used a brief training procedure that incorporated feedback and role-play practice to train staff members to conduct stimulus preference assessments, and we used group-comparison methods to evaluate the effects of training. Staff members were trained to implement the multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment in a single session and the paired-stimulus method in another single session. In all 16 cases (2 assessments for 8 trainees), correct responding increased to over 80% accuracy; in 14 of those 16 cases, it increased to over 90% accuracy. Thus, training produced mastery-level performance in a single training session in almost all cases.

AB - We used a brief training procedure that incorporated feedback and role-play practice to train staff members to conduct stimulus preference assessments, and we used group-comparison methods to evaluate the effects of training. Staff members were trained to implement the multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment in a single session and the paired-stimulus method in another single session. In all 16 cases (2 assessments for 8 trainees), correct responding increased to over 80% accuracy; in 14 of those 16 cases, it increased to over 90% accuracy. Thus, training produced mastery-level performance in a single training session in almost all cases.

KW - Feedback

KW - Staff training

KW - Stimulus preference assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46049114063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46049114063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-249

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-249

M3 - Article

C2 - 18595289

AN - SCOPUS:46049114063

VL - 41

SP - 249

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 2

ER -