Evaluation in constitutional law

An application to the first amendment

Richard L Wiener, Mark Small

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article argues that program evaluation data may be useful to the courts when they are deciding First Amendment constitutional law disputes. Specifically, we focus on how program evaluation data, quantitative and qualitative, may be dispositive in dealing with two types of First Amendment cases—pornography and commercial speech. The different evaluative approaches that are warranted with each type of case are compared and contrasted. The different possible legal routes that program evaluation data may take to influence the outcome of constitutional law disputes determines the empirical type of approach to be utilized. Where pornography cases lend themselves more to social science data being used in trials, cases of commercial speech are more likely to use data at the appellate level. Social scientists interested in conducting legally relevant research should structure their research accordingly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-205
Number of pages9
JournalBehavioral sciences & the law
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

constitutional law
Program Evaluation
Jurisprudence
amendment
data analysis
Dissent and Disputes
evaluation
Erotica
pornography
Social Sciences
social scientist
Research
social science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Evaluation in constitutional law : An application to the first amendment. / Wiener, Richard L; Small, Mark.

In: Behavioral sciences & the law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.1994, p. 197-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{240f7b74a2884dab92b65960c5d58fc2,
title = "Evaluation in constitutional law: An application to the first amendment",
abstract = "This article argues that program evaluation data may be useful to the courts when they are deciding First Amendment constitutional law disputes. Specifically, we focus on how program evaluation data, quantitative and qualitative, may be dispositive in dealing with two types of First Amendment cases—pornography and commercial speech. The different evaluative approaches that are warranted with each type of case are compared and contrasted. The different possible legal routes that program evaluation data may take to influence the outcome of constitutional law disputes determines the empirical type of approach to be utilized. Where pornography cases lend themselves more to social science data being used in trials, cases of commercial speech are more likely to use data at the appellate level. Social scientists interested in conducting legally relevant research should structure their research accordingly.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L} and Mark Small",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.2370120208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "197--205",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation in constitutional law

T2 - An application to the first amendment

AU - Wiener, Richard L

AU - Small, Mark

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - This article argues that program evaluation data may be useful to the courts when they are deciding First Amendment constitutional law disputes. Specifically, we focus on how program evaluation data, quantitative and qualitative, may be dispositive in dealing with two types of First Amendment cases—pornography and commercial speech. The different evaluative approaches that are warranted with each type of case are compared and contrasted. The different possible legal routes that program evaluation data may take to influence the outcome of constitutional law disputes determines the empirical type of approach to be utilized. Where pornography cases lend themselves more to social science data being used in trials, cases of commercial speech are more likely to use data at the appellate level. Social scientists interested in conducting legally relevant research should structure their research accordingly.

AB - This article argues that program evaluation data may be useful to the courts when they are deciding First Amendment constitutional law disputes. Specifically, we focus on how program evaluation data, quantitative and qualitative, may be dispositive in dealing with two types of First Amendment cases—pornography and commercial speech. The different evaluative approaches that are warranted with each type of case are compared and contrasted. The different possible legal routes that program evaluation data may take to influence the outcome of constitutional law disputes determines the empirical type of approach to be utilized. Where pornography cases lend themselves more to social science data being used in trials, cases of commercial speech are more likely to use data at the appellate level. Social scientists interested in conducting legally relevant research should structure their research accordingly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028304401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028304401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2370120208

DO - 10.1002/bsl.2370120208

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 197

EP - 205

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 2

ER -