Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals

Katherine J. Jones, Anne Skinner, Dawn Venema, John Crowe, Robin High, Victoria Kennel, Joseph Allen, Roni Reiter-Palmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the implementation and outcomes of evidence-based fall-risk-reduction processes when those processes are implemented using a multiteam system (MTS) structure. Data Sources/Study Setting: Fall-risk-reduction process and outcome measures from 16 small rural hospitals participating in a research demonstration and dissemination study from August 2012 to July 2014. Previously, these hospitals lacked a fall-event reporting system to drive improvement. Study Design: A one-group pretest-posttest embedded in a participatory research framework. We required hospitals to implement MTSs, which we supported by conducting education, developing an online toolkit, and establishing a fall-event reporting system. Data Collection: Hospitals used gap analyses to assess the presence of fall-risk-reduction processes at study beginning and their frequency and effectiveness at study end; they reported fall-event data throughout the study. Principal Findings: The extent to which hospitals implemented 21 processes to coordinate the fall-risk-reduction program and trained staff specifically about the program predicted unassisted and injurious fall rates during the end-of-study period (January 2014-July 2014). Bedside fall-risk-reduction processes were not significant predictors of these outcomes. Conclusions: Multiteam systems that effectively coordinate fall-risk-reduction processes may improve the capacity of hospitals to manage the complex patient, environmental, and system factors that result in falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)994-1006
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Rural Hospitals
Risk Reduction Behavior
Inpatients
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Information Storage and Retrieval
Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education

Keywords

  • falls
  • implementation evaluation
  • multiteam systems
  • patient safety
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals. / Jones, Katherine J.; Skinner, Anne; Venema, Dawn; Crowe, John; High, Robin; Kennel, Victoria; Allen, Joseph; Reiter-Palmon, Roni.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 54, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 994-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b512a13c68044f5bd23c1ef93d28823,
title = "Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the implementation and outcomes of evidence-based fall-risk-reduction processes when those processes are implemented using a multiteam system (MTS) structure. Data Sources/Study Setting: Fall-risk-reduction process and outcome measures from 16 small rural hospitals participating in a research demonstration and dissemination study from August 2012 to July 2014. Previously, these hospitals lacked a fall-event reporting system to drive improvement. Study Design: A one-group pretest-posttest embedded in a participatory research framework. We required hospitals to implement MTSs, which we supported by conducting education, developing an online toolkit, and establishing a fall-event reporting system. Data Collection: Hospitals used gap analyses to assess the presence of fall-risk-reduction processes at study beginning and their frequency and effectiveness at study end; they reported fall-event data throughout the study. Principal Findings: The extent to which hospitals implemented 21 processes to coordinate the fall-risk-reduction program and trained staff specifically about the program predicted unassisted and injurious fall rates during the end-of-study period (January 2014-July 2014). Bedside fall-risk-reduction processes were not significant predictors of these outcomes. Conclusions: Multiteam systems that effectively coordinate fall-risk-reduction processes may improve the capacity of hospitals to manage the complex patient, environmental, and system factors that result in falls.",
keywords = "falls, implementation evaluation, multiteam systems, patient safety, quality improvement",
author = "Jones, {Katherine J.} and Anne Skinner and Dawn Venema and John Crowe and Robin High and Victoria Kennel and Joseph Allen and Roni Reiter-Palmon",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.13186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "994--1006",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals

AU - Jones, Katherine J.

AU - Skinner, Anne

AU - Venema, Dawn

AU - Crowe, John

AU - High, Robin

AU - Kennel, Victoria

AU - Allen, Joseph

AU - Reiter-Palmon, Roni

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the implementation and outcomes of evidence-based fall-risk-reduction processes when those processes are implemented using a multiteam system (MTS) structure. Data Sources/Study Setting: Fall-risk-reduction process and outcome measures from 16 small rural hospitals participating in a research demonstration and dissemination study from August 2012 to July 2014. Previously, these hospitals lacked a fall-event reporting system to drive improvement. Study Design: A one-group pretest-posttest embedded in a participatory research framework. We required hospitals to implement MTSs, which we supported by conducting education, developing an online toolkit, and establishing a fall-event reporting system. Data Collection: Hospitals used gap analyses to assess the presence of fall-risk-reduction processes at study beginning and their frequency and effectiveness at study end; they reported fall-event data throughout the study. Principal Findings: The extent to which hospitals implemented 21 processes to coordinate the fall-risk-reduction program and trained staff specifically about the program predicted unassisted and injurious fall rates during the end-of-study period (January 2014-July 2014). Bedside fall-risk-reduction processes were not significant predictors of these outcomes. Conclusions: Multiteam systems that effectively coordinate fall-risk-reduction processes may improve the capacity of hospitals to manage the complex patient, environmental, and system factors that result in falls.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the implementation and outcomes of evidence-based fall-risk-reduction processes when those processes are implemented using a multiteam system (MTS) structure. Data Sources/Study Setting: Fall-risk-reduction process and outcome measures from 16 small rural hospitals participating in a research demonstration and dissemination study from August 2012 to July 2014. Previously, these hospitals lacked a fall-event reporting system to drive improvement. Study Design: A one-group pretest-posttest embedded in a participatory research framework. We required hospitals to implement MTSs, which we supported by conducting education, developing an online toolkit, and establishing a fall-event reporting system. Data Collection: Hospitals used gap analyses to assess the presence of fall-risk-reduction processes at study beginning and their frequency and effectiveness at study end; they reported fall-event data throughout the study. Principal Findings: The extent to which hospitals implemented 21 processes to coordinate the fall-risk-reduction program and trained staff specifically about the program predicted unassisted and injurious fall rates during the end-of-study period (January 2014-July 2014). Bedside fall-risk-reduction processes were not significant predictors of these outcomes. Conclusions: Multiteam systems that effectively coordinate fall-risk-reduction processes may improve the capacity of hospitals to manage the complex patient, environmental, and system factors that result in falls.

KW - falls

KW - implementation evaluation

KW - multiteam systems

KW - patient safety

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067677516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067677516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.13186

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.13186

M3 - Article

C2 - 31215029

AN - SCOPUS:85067677516

VL - 54

SP - 994

EP - 1006

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 5

ER -