Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1

L. D. Miller, Leen-Kiat Soh, Ashok K Samal, Gwen C Nugent, Kevin A Kupzyk, Leyla Masmaliyeva

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
Pages57-62
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2011
Event42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2011 - Dallas, TX, United States
Duration: Mar 9 2011Mar 12 2011

Publication series

NameSIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Conference

Conference42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2011
CountryUnited States
CityDallas, TX
Period3/9/113/12/11

Fingerprint

Students
learning
Feedback
student
Computer science
Education
computer science
lack
Problem-Based Learning
interaction
education
Group

Keywords

  • Active learning
  • Feedback
  • Learning objects
  • Motivation
  • Self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Miller, L. D., Soh, L-K., Samal, A. K., Nugent, G. C., Kupzyk, K. A., & Masmaliyeva, L. (2011). Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. In SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 57-62). (SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education). https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953183

Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. / Miller, L. D.; Soh, Leen-Kiat; Samal, Ashok K; Nugent, Gwen C; Kupzyk, Kevin A; Masmaliyeva, Leyla.

SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2011. p. 57-62 (SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Miller, LD, Soh, L-K, Samal, AK, Nugent, GC, Kupzyk, KA & Masmaliyeva, L 2011, Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. in SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 57-62, 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2011, Dallas, TX, United States, 3/9/11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953183
Miller LD, Soh L-K, Samal AK, Nugent GC, Kupzyk KA, Masmaliyeva L. Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. In SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2011. p. 57-62. (SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education). https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953183
Miller, L. D. ; Soh, Leen-Kiat ; Samal, Ashok K ; Nugent, Gwen C ; Kupzyk, Kevin A ; Masmaliyeva, Leyla. / Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2011. pp. 57-62 (SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education).
@inproceedings{f6f78b3a9f4240e3ac75c951f4ad7243,
title = "Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1",
abstract = "Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.",
keywords = "Active learning, Feedback, Learning objects, Motivation, Self-efficacy",
author = "Miller, {L. D.} and Leen-Kiat Soh and Samal, {Ashok K} and Nugent, {Gwen C} and Kupzyk, {Kevin A} and Leyla Masmaliyeva",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1145/1953163.1953183",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781450305006",
series = "SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education",
pages = "57--62",
booktitle = "SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1

AU - Miller, L. D.

AU - Soh, Leen-Kiat

AU - Samal, Ashok K

AU - Nugent, Gwen C

AU - Kupzyk, Kevin A

AU - Masmaliyeva, Leyla

PY - 2011/4/19

Y1 - 2011/4/19

N2 - Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.

AB - Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.

KW - Active learning

KW - Feedback

KW - Learning objects

KW - Motivation

KW - Self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954447455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954447455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1953163.1953183

DO - 10.1145/1953163.1953183

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79954447455

SN - 9781450305006

T3 - SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

SP - 57

EP - 62

BT - SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

ER -